Loading…
A training programme facilitating guideline use of occupational health professionals: a feasibility study
To evaluate whether a training programme is a feasible approach to facilitate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) use of knowledge and skills provided by a guideline. Feasibility was evaluated by researching three aspects: 'acceptability', 'implementation' and 'li...
Saved in:
| Published in: | BMC medical education 2018-10, Vol.18 (1), p.226-226, Article 226 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363 |
| container_end_page | 226 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 226 |
| container_title | BMC medical education |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Vooijs, Marloes Bossen, Daniël Hoving, Jan L Wind, Haije Frings-Dresen, Monique H W |
| description | To evaluate whether a training programme is a feasible approach to facilitate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) use of knowledge and skills provided by a guideline.
Feasibility was evaluated by researching three aspects: 'acceptability', 'implementation' and 'limited efficacy'. Statements on acceptability and implementation were rated by OHPs on 10-point visual analogue scales after following the training programme (T2). Answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were explored through open-ended questions at T2, which were qualitatively analysed. Limited efficacy was evaluated by measuring the level of knowledge and skills at baseline (T0), after reading the guideline (T1) and directly after completing the training programme (T2). Increase in knowledge and skills was analysed using a non-paramatric Friedman test and post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank tests (two-tailed).
The 38 OHPs found the training programme acceptable, judging that it was relevant (M: 8, SD: 1), increased their capability (M: 7, SD: 1), adhered to their daily practice (M: 8, SD: 1) and enhanced their guidance and assessment of people with a chronic disease (M: 8, SD: 1). OHPs found that it was feasible to implement the programme on a larger scale (M: 7, SD: 1) but foresaw barriers such as 'time', 'money' and organizational constraints. The reported facilitators were primarily related to the added value of the knowledge and skills to the OHPs' guidance and assessment, and that the programme taught them to apply the evidence in practice. Regarding limited efficacy, a significant increase was seen in OHPs' knowledge and skills over time (X
(2) = 53.656, p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12909-018-1223-1 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_281474a5fea54c739ec6baa39b97b3e2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557653528</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_281474a5fea54c739ec6baa39b97b3e2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A557653528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIfsAP4IIiceGSYj9_xOGAtKooVKrEBc6W4zxnvUrixU6Q9t_jdEvpIuSDrXkzY3s0RfGGkitKlfyQKDSkqQhVFQVgFX1WnFNeQyUbIM-fnM-Ki5R2hNBaMfqyOGMElKiBnxd-U87R-MlPfbmPoY9mHLF0xvrBz2Ze4X7xHQ5-wnJJWAZXBmuXfZ6FyQzlFs0wb1etw5TusfSxNKVDk3y7uhzKNC_d4VXxwuUZvn7YL4sfN5-_X3-t7r59ub3e3FVWSDJXVDmOAqRg0ADUXNTYtASskxk1jHAGFmVHlAVuKJiWuRYsQ-SMtg2T7LK4Pfp2wez0PvrRxIMOxut7IMRemzh7O6AGlRPiRuS3Cm5r1qCVrTGsaZu6ZQjZ69PRa7-0I3YWpxzWcGJ6Opn8Vvfhl5ZUNoSQbPD-wSCGnwumWY8-WRwGM2FYkgZKpeIC-Ep99w91F5a4xplZAIoIRtRfVm_yB_zkQr7XrqZ6I0SdYxOwsq7-w8qrw9HbMKHzGT8R0KPAxpBSRPf4R0r02jV97JrOXdNr1zTNmrdPw3lU_CkX-w3ziM7i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2122805308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A training programme facilitating guideline use of occupational health professionals: a feasibility study</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Vooijs, Marloes ; Bossen, Daniël ; Hoving, Jan L ; Wind, Haije ; Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</creator><creatorcontrib>Vooijs, Marloes ; Bossen, Daniël ; Hoving, Jan L ; Wind, Haije ; Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate whether a training programme is a feasible approach to facilitate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) use of knowledge and skills provided by a guideline.
Feasibility was evaluated by researching three aspects: 'acceptability', 'implementation' and 'limited efficacy'. Statements on acceptability and implementation were rated by OHPs on 10-point visual analogue scales after following the training programme (T2). Answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were explored through open-ended questions at T2, which were qualitatively analysed. Limited efficacy was evaluated by measuring the level of knowledge and skills at baseline (T0), after reading the guideline (T1) and directly after completing the training programme (T2). Increase in knowledge and skills was analysed using a non-paramatric Friedman test and post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank tests (two-tailed).
The 38 OHPs found the training programme acceptable, judging that it was relevant (M: 8, SD: 1), increased their capability (M: 7, SD: 1), adhered to their daily practice (M: 8, SD: 1) and enhanced their guidance and assessment of people with a chronic disease (M: 8, SD: 1). OHPs found that it was feasible to implement the programme on a larger scale (M: 7, SD: 1) but foresaw barriers such as 'time', 'money' and organizational constraints. The reported facilitators were primarily related to the added value of the knowledge and skills to the OHPs' guidance and assessment, and that the programme taught them to apply the evidence in practice. Regarding limited efficacy, a significant increase was seen in OHPs' knowledge and skills over time (X
(2) = 53.656, p < 0.001), with the median score improving from 6.3 (T0), 8.3 (T1) and 12.3 (T2). Post-hoc tests indicated a significant improvement between T0 and T1 (p < 0.001) and between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001).
The training programme was found to be a feasible approach to facilitate OHPs' use of knowledge and skills provided by the guideline, from the perspective of OHPs generally (acceptability and implementation) and with respect to their increase in knowledge and skills in particular (limited efficacy).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1223-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30285724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Barriers ; Chronic illnesses ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Educational Methods ; Evidence ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Guidance ; Guideline adherence ; Guidelines ; Health Personnel ; Higher education ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Knowledge Level ; Male ; Medical Education ; Medical personnel ; Occupational health ; Occupational health physicians ; Occupational medicine ; Occupational Medicine - education ; Occupational Safety and Health ; Physicians ; Physicians, Primary Care - education ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Professionals ; Trainees ; Training ; Training programme</subject><ispartof>BMC medical education, 2018-10, Vol.18 (1), p.226-226, Article 226</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1563-5768</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169000/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2122805308?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,37012,37013,43733,43880,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vooijs, Marloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossen, Daniël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoving, Jan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wind, Haije</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</creatorcontrib><title>A training programme facilitating guideline use of occupational health professionals: a feasibility study</title><title>BMC medical education</title><addtitle>BMC Med Educ</addtitle><description>To evaluate whether a training programme is a feasible approach to facilitate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) use of knowledge and skills provided by a guideline.
Feasibility was evaluated by researching three aspects: 'acceptability', 'implementation' and 'limited efficacy'. Statements on acceptability and implementation were rated by OHPs on 10-point visual analogue scales after following the training programme (T2). Answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were explored through open-ended questions at T2, which were qualitatively analysed. Limited efficacy was evaluated by measuring the level of knowledge and skills at baseline (T0), after reading the guideline (T1) and directly after completing the training programme (T2). Increase in knowledge and skills was analysed using a non-paramatric Friedman test and post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank tests (two-tailed).
The 38 OHPs found the training programme acceptable, judging that it was relevant (M: 8, SD: 1), increased their capability (M: 7, SD: 1), adhered to their daily practice (M: 8, SD: 1) and enhanced their guidance and assessment of people with a chronic disease (M: 8, SD: 1). OHPs found that it was feasible to implement the programme on a larger scale (M: 7, SD: 1) but foresaw barriers such as 'time', 'money' and organizational constraints. The reported facilitators were primarily related to the added value of the knowledge and skills to the OHPs' guidance and assessment, and that the programme taught them to apply the evidence in practice. Regarding limited efficacy, a significant increase was seen in OHPs' knowledge and skills over time (X
(2) = 53.656, p < 0.001), with the median score improving from 6.3 (T0), 8.3 (T1) and 12.3 (T2). Post-hoc tests indicated a significant improvement between T0 and T1 (p < 0.001) and between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001).
The training programme was found to be a feasible approach to facilitate OHPs' use of knowledge and skills provided by the guideline, from the perspective of OHPs generally (acceptability and implementation) and with respect to their increase in knowledge and skills in particular (limited efficacy).</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Educational Methods</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Guideline adherence</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational health physicians</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine - education</subject><subject>Occupational Safety and Health</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians, Primary Care - education</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Training programme</subject><issn>1472-6920</issn><issn>1472-6920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIfsAP4IIiceGSYj9_xOGAtKooVKrEBc6W4zxnvUrixU6Q9t_jdEvpIuSDrXkzY3s0RfGGkitKlfyQKDSkqQhVFQVgFX1WnFNeQyUbIM-fnM-Ki5R2hNBaMfqyOGMElKiBnxd-U87R-MlPfbmPoY9mHLF0xvrBz2Ze4X7xHQ5-wnJJWAZXBmuXfZ6FyQzlFs0wb1etw5TusfSxNKVDk3y7uhzKNC_d4VXxwuUZvn7YL4sfN5-_X3-t7r59ub3e3FVWSDJXVDmOAqRg0ADUXNTYtASskxk1jHAGFmVHlAVuKJiWuRYsQ-SMtg2T7LK4Pfp2wez0PvrRxIMOxut7IMRemzh7O6AGlRPiRuS3Cm5r1qCVrTGsaZu6ZQjZ69PRa7-0I3YWpxzWcGJ6Opn8Vvfhl5ZUNoSQbPD-wSCGnwumWY8-WRwGM2FYkgZKpeIC-Ep99w91F5a4xplZAIoIRtRfVm_yB_zkQr7XrqZ6I0SdYxOwsq7-w8qrw9HbMKHzGT8R0KPAxpBSRPf4R0r02jV97JrOXdNr1zTNmrdPw3lU_CkX-w3ziM7i</recordid><startdate>20181003</startdate><enddate>20181003</enddate><creator>Vooijs, Marloes</creator><creator>Bossen, Daniël</creator><creator>Hoving, Jan L</creator><creator>Wind, Haije</creator><creator>Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-5768</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181003</creationdate><title>A training programme facilitating guideline use of occupational health professionals: a feasibility study</title><author>Vooijs, Marloes ; Bossen, Daniël ; Hoving, Jan L ; Wind, Haije ; Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Educational Methods</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Guideline adherence</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational health physicians</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine - education</topic><topic>Occupational Safety and Health</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians, Primary Care - education</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Training programme</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vooijs, Marloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossen, Daniël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoving, Jan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wind, Haije</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vooijs, Marloes</au><au>Bossen, Daniël</au><au>Hoving, Jan L</au><au>Wind, Haije</au><au>Frings-Dresen, Monique H W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A training programme facilitating guideline use of occupational health professionals: a feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical education</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Educ</addtitle><date>2018-10-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>226-226</pages><artnum>226</artnum><issn>1472-6920</issn><eissn>1472-6920</eissn><abstract>To evaluate whether a training programme is a feasible approach to facilitate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) use of knowledge and skills provided by a guideline.
Feasibility was evaluated by researching three aspects: 'acceptability', 'implementation' and 'limited efficacy'. Statements on acceptability and implementation were rated by OHPs on 10-point visual analogue scales after following the training programme (T2). Answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were explored through open-ended questions at T2, which were qualitatively analysed. Limited efficacy was evaluated by measuring the level of knowledge and skills at baseline (T0), after reading the guideline (T1) and directly after completing the training programme (T2). Increase in knowledge and skills was analysed using a non-paramatric Friedman test and post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank tests (two-tailed).
The 38 OHPs found the training programme acceptable, judging that it was relevant (M: 8, SD: 1), increased their capability (M: 7, SD: 1), adhered to their daily practice (M: 8, SD: 1) and enhanced their guidance and assessment of people with a chronic disease (M: 8, SD: 1). OHPs found that it was feasible to implement the programme on a larger scale (M: 7, SD: 1) but foresaw barriers such as 'time', 'money' and organizational constraints. The reported facilitators were primarily related to the added value of the knowledge and skills to the OHPs' guidance and assessment, and that the programme taught them to apply the evidence in practice. Regarding limited efficacy, a significant increase was seen in OHPs' knowledge and skills over time (X
(2) = 53.656, p < 0.001), with the median score improving from 6.3 (T0), 8.3 (T1) and 12.3 (T2). Post-hoc tests indicated a significant improvement between T0 and T1 (p < 0.001) and between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001).
The training programme was found to be a feasible approach to facilitate OHPs' use of knowledge and skills provided by the guideline, from the perspective of OHPs generally (acceptability and implementation) and with respect to their increase in knowledge and skills in particular (limited efficacy).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30285724</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12909-018-1223-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-5768</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1472-6920 |
| ispartof | BMC medical education, 2018-10, Vol.18 (1), p.226-226, Article 226 |
| issn | 1472-6920 1472-6920 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_281474a5fea54c739ec6baa39b97b3e2 |
| source | PubMed (Medline); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
| subjects | Analysis Attitude of Health Personnel Barriers Chronic illnesses Clinical Competence - standards Educational Methods Evidence Feasibility Studies Female Guidance Guideline adherence Guidelines Health Personnel Higher education Humans Knowledge Knowledge Level Male Medical Education Medical personnel Occupational health Occupational health physicians Occupational medicine Occupational Medicine - education Occupational Safety and Health Physicians Physicians, Primary Care - education Practice guidelines (Medicine) Professionals Trainees Training Training programme |
| title | A training programme facilitating guideline use of occupational health professionals: a feasibility study |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A16%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20training%20programme%20facilitating%20guideline%20use%20of%20occupational%20health%20professionals:%20a%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20education&rft.au=Vooijs,%20Marloes&rft.date=2018-10-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=226-226&rft.artnum=226&rft.issn=1472-6920&rft.eissn=1472-6920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12909-018-1223-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA557653528%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-18f4e5265329227457e9b02cf6e52a30432ce6d08c24a12ab3fb2c3ee431b9363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2122805308&rft_id=info:pmid/30285724&rft_galeid=A557653528&rfr_iscdi=true |