Loading…

Dynamic Changes in and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in China from 2001 to 2020

It remains unclear what changes have occurred in the distribution pattern of and trend in soil organic carbon (SOC) in China against the background of climate and land use change. Clarifying the dynamic changes in SOC and their driving factors in different regions of China is therefore crucial for a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land (Basel) 2024-11, Vol.13 (11), p.1764
Main Authors: Zou, Fuyan, Yan, Min, Zhang, Liankai, Yang, Jinjiang, Chen, Guiren, Shan, Keqiang, Zhang, Chen, Xu, Xiongwei, Wang, Zhenhui, Xu, Can
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3d9bf9059e9223fce1d163435fb0a00ef5a7a39f9a165640f41b85b2bc0e733e3
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1764
container_title Land (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Zou, Fuyan
Yan, Min
Zhang, Liankai
Yang, Jinjiang
Chen, Guiren
Shan, Keqiang
Zhang, Chen
Xu, Xiongwei
Wang, Zhenhui
Xu, Can
description It remains unclear what changes have occurred in the distribution pattern of and trend in soil organic carbon (SOC) in China against the background of climate and land use change. Clarifying the dynamic changes in SOC and their driving factors in different regions of China is therefore crucial for assessing the global carbon cycle. In this study, we collected and supplemented a large amount of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) data in China from 2001 to 2020 and extracted data on environmental covariates (ECs) for the corresponding years. A random forest model was used to estimate the SOCD at a depth of 0–20 cm and 0–100 cm in China for the years 2001, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, and we explored the trend of SOCD changes and their key driving factors. The results showed the following: (1) Compared with previous studies, the predictive ability of the 0–100 cm depth model was greatly improved; the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.61 and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) was =0.76. (2) From 2001 to 2020, China’s soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) were 38.11, 39.11, 39.88, 40.16, and 41.12 Pg C for the 0–20 cm depth and 110.49, 112.67, 112.80, 113.06, and 114.96 Pg C for the 0–100 cm depth, respectively. (3) The effects of temperature and precipitation on SOCD in China showed obvious regional variability, and land use changes had mainly positive effects on SOCD in all regions of China, which was related to the large-scale implementation of ecological protection and restoration and the policy of returning farmland to forests and grasslands in China. This study provides strong scientific support for addressing climate change and rationalizing the use of land resources.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/land13111764
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_284f34514f63471190a795a08b0dad48</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A818334493</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_284f34514f63471190a795a08b0dad48</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A818334493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3d9bf9059e9223fce1d163435fb0a00ef5a7a39f9a165640f41b85b2bc0e733e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1LBDEMhgdRUNSbP6Dg1dVk0s5Mj7J-guBBBW8lM9OOXXZb7YyC_96uK7LJISG8eRKSojhBOCfScLHk0CMhYl3JneKghJpmUqrX3a18vzgexwVk00iNVAfF69V34JXvxPyNw2BH4YPIIHGV_JcPg7jhboppFNGJp-iX4jENHNZyTm0Ma_X8zQcWLsWVKAFQTDHHEo6KPcfL0R7_xcPi5eb6eX43e3i8vZ9fPsy6UtM0o163ToPSVpcluc5ijxVJUq4FBrBOcc2knWasVCXBSWwb1ZZtB7YmsnRY3G-4feSFeU9-xenbRPbmtxDTYDhNvltaUzbSkVQoXZ5QI2rgWiuGpoWee9lk1umG9Z7ix6cdJ7OInynk9Q0hEdRSV5BV5xvVwBnqg4tT4i57b_MhY7DO5_plgw2RlJpyw9mmoUtxHJN1_2simPXvzPbv6AeRyodu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133074960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Changes in and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in China from 2001 to 2020</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><creator>Zou, Fuyan ; Yan, Min ; Zhang, Liankai ; Yang, Jinjiang ; Chen, Guiren ; Shan, Keqiang ; Zhang, Chen ; Xu, Xiongwei ; Wang, Zhenhui ; Xu, Can</creator><creatorcontrib>Zou, Fuyan ; Yan, Min ; Zhang, Liankai ; Yang, Jinjiang ; Chen, Guiren ; Shan, Keqiang ; Zhang, Chen ; Xu, Xiongwei ; Wang, Zhenhui ; Xu, Can</creatorcontrib><description>It remains unclear what changes have occurred in the distribution pattern of and trend in soil organic carbon (SOC) in China against the background of climate and land use change. Clarifying the dynamic changes in SOC and their driving factors in different regions of China is therefore crucial for assessing the global carbon cycle. In this study, we collected and supplemented a large amount of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) data in China from 2001 to 2020 and extracted data on environmental covariates (ECs) for the corresponding years. A random forest model was used to estimate the SOCD at a depth of 0–20 cm and 0–100 cm in China for the years 2001, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, and we explored the trend of SOCD changes and their key driving factors. The results showed the following: (1) Compared with previous studies, the predictive ability of the 0–100 cm depth model was greatly improved; the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.61 and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) was =0.76. (2) From 2001 to 2020, China’s soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) were 38.11, 39.11, 39.88, 40.16, and 41.12 Pg C for the 0–20 cm depth and 110.49, 112.67, 112.80, 113.06, and 114.96 Pg C for the 0–100 cm depth, respectively. (3) The effects of temperature and precipitation on SOCD in China showed obvious regional variability, and land use changes had mainly positive effects on SOCD in all regions of China, which was related to the large-scale implementation of ecological protection and restoration and the policy of returning farmland to forests and grasslands in China. This study provides strong scientific support for addressing climate change and rationalizing the use of land resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-445X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-445X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/land13111764</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Carbon content ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry) ; Carbon sequestration ; China ; Climate action ; Climate change ; Climatic changes ; Computer centers ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Datasets ; Ecological effects ; Forest management ; Geospatial data ; Global warming ; Grasslands ; Land resources ; Land use ; Organic carbon ; Organic soils ; Precipitation ; random forest ; Regions ; SOC ; Soil structure ; Soils ; Temperature effects ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Land (Basel), 2024-11, Vol.13 (11), p.1764</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3d9bf9059e9223fce1d163435fb0a00ef5a7a39f9a165640f41b85b2bc0e733e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2605-4774 ; 0000-0002-4168-6462 ; 0000-0003-4976-8881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3133074960/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3133074960?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zou, Fuyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liankai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Guiren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Keqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Can</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Changes in and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in China from 2001 to 2020</title><title>Land (Basel)</title><description>It remains unclear what changes have occurred in the distribution pattern of and trend in soil organic carbon (SOC) in China against the background of climate and land use change. Clarifying the dynamic changes in SOC and their driving factors in different regions of China is therefore crucial for assessing the global carbon cycle. In this study, we collected and supplemented a large amount of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) data in China from 2001 to 2020 and extracted data on environmental covariates (ECs) for the corresponding years. A random forest model was used to estimate the SOCD at a depth of 0–20 cm and 0–100 cm in China for the years 2001, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, and we explored the trend of SOCD changes and their key driving factors. The results showed the following: (1) Compared with previous studies, the predictive ability of the 0–100 cm depth model was greatly improved; the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.61 and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) was =0.76. (2) From 2001 to 2020, China’s soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) were 38.11, 39.11, 39.88, 40.16, and 41.12 Pg C for the 0–20 cm depth and 110.49, 112.67, 112.80, 113.06, and 114.96 Pg C for the 0–100 cm depth, respectively. (3) The effects of temperature and precipitation on SOCD in China showed obvious regional variability, and land use changes had mainly positive effects on SOCD in all regions of China, which was related to the large-scale implementation of ecological protection and restoration and the policy of returning farmland to forests and grasslands in China. This study provides strong scientific support for addressing climate change and rationalizing the use of land resources.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climate action</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Computer centers</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Land resources</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>random forest</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>SOC</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>2073-445X</issn><issn>2073-445X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1LBDEMhgdRUNSbP6Dg1dVk0s5Mj7J-guBBBW8lM9OOXXZb7YyC_96uK7LJISG8eRKSojhBOCfScLHk0CMhYl3JneKghJpmUqrX3a18vzgexwVk00iNVAfF69V34JXvxPyNw2BH4YPIIHGV_JcPg7jhboppFNGJp-iX4jENHNZyTm0Ma_X8zQcWLsWVKAFQTDHHEo6KPcfL0R7_xcPi5eb6eX43e3i8vZ9fPsy6UtM0o163ToPSVpcluc5ijxVJUq4FBrBOcc2knWasVCXBSWwb1ZZtB7YmsnRY3G-4feSFeU9-xenbRPbmtxDTYDhNvltaUzbSkVQoXZ5QI2rgWiuGpoWee9lk1umG9Z7ix6cdJ7OInynk9Q0hEdRSV5BV5xvVwBnqg4tT4i57b_MhY7DO5_plgw2RlJpyw9mmoUtxHJN1_2simPXvzPbv6AeRyodu</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Zou, Fuyan</creator><creator>Yan, Min</creator><creator>Zhang, Liankai</creator><creator>Yang, Jinjiang</creator><creator>Chen, Guiren</creator><creator>Shan, Keqiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Chen</creator><creator>Xu, Xiongwei</creator><creator>Wang, Zhenhui</creator><creator>Xu, Can</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-4774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-6462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-8881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Dynamic Changes in and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in China from 2001 to 2020</title><author>Zou, Fuyan ; Yan, Min ; Zhang, Liankai ; Yang, Jinjiang ; Chen, Guiren ; Shan, Keqiang ; Zhang, Chen ; Xu, Xiongwei ; Wang, Zhenhui ; Xu, Can</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3d9bf9059e9223fce1d163435fb0a00ef5a7a39f9a165640f41b85b2bc0e733e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climate action</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Computer centers</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Land resources</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>random forest</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>SOC</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zou, Fuyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liankai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Guiren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Keqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Can</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</collection><jtitle>Land (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zou, Fuyan</au><au>Yan, Min</au><au>Zhang, Liankai</au><au>Yang, Jinjiang</au><au>Chen, Guiren</au><au>Shan, Keqiang</au><au>Zhang, Chen</au><au>Xu, Xiongwei</au><au>Wang, Zhenhui</au><au>Xu, Can</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Changes in and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in China from 2001 to 2020</atitle><jtitle>Land (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1764</spage><pages>1764-</pages><issn>2073-445X</issn><eissn>2073-445X</eissn><abstract>It remains unclear what changes have occurred in the distribution pattern of and trend in soil organic carbon (SOC) in China against the background of climate and land use change. Clarifying the dynamic changes in SOC and their driving factors in different regions of China is therefore crucial for assessing the global carbon cycle. In this study, we collected and supplemented a large amount of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) data in China from 2001 to 2020 and extracted data on environmental covariates (ECs) for the corresponding years. A random forest model was used to estimate the SOCD at a depth of 0–20 cm and 0–100 cm in China for the years 2001, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, and we explored the trend of SOCD changes and their key driving factors. The results showed the following: (1) Compared with previous studies, the predictive ability of the 0–100 cm depth model was greatly improved; the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.61 and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) was =0.76. (2) From 2001 to 2020, China’s soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) were 38.11, 39.11, 39.88, 40.16, and 41.12 Pg C for the 0–20 cm depth and 110.49, 112.67, 112.80, 113.06, and 114.96 Pg C for the 0–100 cm depth, respectively. (3) The effects of temperature and precipitation on SOCD in China showed obvious regional variability, and land use changes had mainly positive effects on SOCD in all regions of China, which was related to the large-scale implementation of ecological protection and restoration and the policy of returning farmland to forests and grasslands in China. This study provides strong scientific support for addressing climate change and rationalizing the use of land resources.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/land13111764</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-4774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-6462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-8881</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-445X
ispartof Land (Basel), 2024-11, Vol.13 (11), p.1764
issn 2073-445X
2073-445X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_284f34514f63471190a795a08b0dad48
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access)
subjects Agricultural land
Carbon content
Carbon cycle
Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)
Carbon sequestration
China
Climate action
Climate change
Climatic changes
Computer centers
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Datasets
Ecological effects
Forest management
Geospatial data
Global warming
Grasslands
Land resources
Land use
Organic carbon
Organic soils
Precipitation
random forest
Regions
SOC
Soil structure
Soils
Temperature effects
Terrestrial ecosystems
Vegetation
title Dynamic Changes in and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in China from 2001 to 2020
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Changes%20in%20and%20Driving%20Factors%20of%20Soil%20Organic%20Carbon%20in%20China%20from%202001%20to%202020&rft.jtitle=Land%20(Basel)&rft.au=Zou,%20Fuyan&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1764&rft.pages=1764-&rft.issn=2073-445X&rft.eissn=2073-445X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/land13111764&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA818334493%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3d9bf9059e9223fce1d163435fb0a00ef5a7a39f9a165640f41b85b2bc0e733e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133074960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A818334493&rfr_iscdi=true