Loading…
New Robotic Platforms for Gynecology. Are We Achieving One of the Golden Goals?
Objective: To summarize the scientific published literature on new robotic platforms with potential use in gynecology and review their evolution from inception until the present day. The goal was to describe the current characteristics and possible prospects of these platforms. Mechanism: A non-syst...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2022-11, Vol.49 (11), p.246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-49144049eef9a674ff551fe74df245f7ffa58ea3e364ae874ab9ffb5c27633853 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Farinha, Rui Sarchi, Luca Paciotti, Marco Bravi, Carlo Andrea Mottaran, Angelo Piro, Adele Nocera, Luigi Calcagnile, Tommaso Assumma, Simone Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara Yadav, Siddhart Terzoni, Stefano Puliatti, Stefano Koukourikis, Periklis Groote, Ruben De Faustino, Fátima Naeyer, Geert De Gaia, Giorgia Rocco, Bernardo Mottrie, Alexandre |
description | Objective: To summarize the scientific published literature on new robotic platforms with potential use in gynecology and review their evolution from inception until the present day. The goal was to describe the current characteristics and possible prospects of these platforms. Mechanism: A non-systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify scientific literature on new robotic platforms and review their evolution from inception until January 2022. Only English-language publications were included in this analysis. The following keywords were used: “new robotic platforms”, “robot”, “Revo-I”, “Versius®”, “Senhance®”, “Single-Site”, “Single-Port”, “Multi-Port”, “EDGE SP1000”, “Flex®”, and “Hominis®”. Abstract reviews were conducted to determine the relevance of the review aims. Full-text analysis of all relevant English-language original articles was subsequently performed by one author (R.F.) and summarized after discussion with an independent third party (L.S., M.P.). No formal quality assessment of the included studies was conducted. Findings in brief: The Da Vinci robotic system is the leading platform in the robotic surgery market. Other new platforms have published peer-reviewed articles in the field of gynecology. Senhance® and Da Vinci SP® have the most substantial proof of their capacity to perform multi-incision and single-incision robotic surgery, respectively. Hominis® has the potential to play a major role in ultra-minimally invasive and scarless approaches. Conclusions: The significant advantages of Intuitive’s robots justify their worldwide dissemination. However, their drawbacks have motivated other companies to develop innovative solutions. Our research shows that the majority of these new platforms are still at the beginning of their technical and scientific validation but seem very promising. |
doi_str_mv | 10.31083/j.ceog4911246 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_28ee274b27b74669913f488db31e7e87</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_28ee274b27b74669913f488db31e7e87</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_28ee274b27b74669913f488db31e7e87</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-49144049eef9a674ff551fe74df245f7ffa58ea3e364ae874ab9ffb5c27633853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFa3rucPJM7Hy0xmJaVoLRQrorgcJsmbNCHNyCQo_feGVsTNPXAXh_cuIbecpZKzXN61aYmhBsO5AHVGZkIzkzBm4JzMmDQsUUrJS3I1DC1jAFrxGdk-4zd9DUUYm5K-dG70Ie4HOiVdHXosQxfqQ0oXEekH0kW5a_Cr6Wu67ZEGT8cd0lXoKuwnuG64vyYXfiLe_HJO3h8f3pZPyWa7Wi8Xm6SUjI3JdCQAA4PojVMavM8y7lFD5QVkXnvvshydRKnAYa7BFcb7IiuFVlLmmZyT9clbBdfaz9jsXTzY4Bp7LEKsrYvTTx1akSMKDYXQhQaljOHSQ55XheSoJ_fkSk-uMoZhiOj_fJzZ47S2tf-mlT8OkWuh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Robotic Platforms for Gynecology. Are We Achieving One of the Golden Goals?</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Farinha, Rui ; Sarchi, Luca ; Paciotti, Marco ; Bravi, Carlo Andrea ; Mottaran, Angelo ; Piro, Adele ; Nocera, Luigi ; Calcagnile, Tommaso ; Assumma, Simone ; Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara ; Yadav, Siddhart ; Terzoni, Stefano ; Puliatti, Stefano ; Koukourikis, Periklis ; Groote, Ruben De ; Faustino, Fátima ; Naeyer, Geert De ; Gaia, Giorgia ; Rocco, Bernardo ; Mottrie, Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Farinha, Rui ; Sarchi, Luca ; Paciotti, Marco ; Bravi, Carlo Andrea ; Mottaran, Angelo ; Piro, Adele ; Nocera, Luigi ; Calcagnile, Tommaso ; Assumma, Simone ; Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara ; Yadav, Siddhart ; Terzoni, Stefano ; Puliatti, Stefano ; Koukourikis, Periklis ; Groote, Ruben De ; Faustino, Fátima ; Naeyer, Geert De ; Gaia, Giorgia ; Rocco, Bernardo ; Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To summarize the scientific published literature on new robotic platforms with potential use in gynecology and review their evolution from inception until the present day. The goal was to describe the current characteristics and possible prospects of these platforms. Mechanism: A non-systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify scientific literature on new robotic platforms and review their evolution from inception until January 2022. Only English-language publications were included in this analysis. The following keywords were used: “new robotic platforms”, “robot”, “Revo-I”, “Versius®”, “Senhance®”, “Single-Site”, “Single-Port”, “Multi-Port”, “EDGE SP1000”, “Flex®”, and “Hominis®”. Abstract reviews were conducted to determine the relevance of the review aims. Full-text analysis of all relevant English-language original articles was subsequently performed by one author (R.F.) and summarized after discussion with an independent third party (L.S., M.P.). No formal quality assessment of the included studies was conducted. Findings in brief: The Da Vinci robotic system is the leading platform in the robotic surgery market. Other new platforms have published peer-reviewed articles in the field of gynecology. Senhance® and Da Vinci SP® have the most substantial proof of their capacity to perform multi-incision and single-incision robotic surgery, respectively. Hominis® has the potential to play a major role in ultra-minimally invasive and scarless approaches. Conclusions: The significant advantages of Intuitive’s robots justify their worldwide dissemination. However, their drawbacks have motivated other companies to develop innovative solutions. Our research shows that the majority of these new platforms are still at the beginning of their technical and scientific validation but seem very promising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0390-6663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2709-0094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4911246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IMR Press</publisher><subject>edge sp1000 ; flex ; hominis ; multi-port ; revo-i ; robotic surgery ; senhance ; single-port ; single-site ; versius</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology, 2022-11, Vol.49 (11), p.246</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-49144049eef9a674ff551fe74df245f7ffa58ea3e364ae874ab9ffb5c27633853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farinha, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarchi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paciotti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravi, Carlo Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottaran, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piro, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nocera, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calcagnile, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assumma, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Siddhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terzoni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puliatti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koukourikis, Periklis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groote, Ruben De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faustino, Fátima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naeyer, Geert De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaia, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocco, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>New Robotic Platforms for Gynecology. Are We Achieving One of the Golden Goals?</title><title>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology</title><description>Objective: To summarize the scientific published literature on new robotic platforms with potential use in gynecology and review their evolution from inception until the present day. The goal was to describe the current characteristics and possible prospects of these platforms. Mechanism: A non-systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify scientific literature on new robotic platforms and review their evolution from inception until January 2022. Only English-language publications were included in this analysis. The following keywords were used: “new robotic platforms”, “robot”, “Revo-I”, “Versius®”, “Senhance®”, “Single-Site”, “Single-Port”, “Multi-Port”, “EDGE SP1000”, “Flex®”, and “Hominis®”. Abstract reviews were conducted to determine the relevance of the review aims. Full-text analysis of all relevant English-language original articles was subsequently performed by one author (R.F.) and summarized after discussion with an independent third party (L.S., M.P.). No formal quality assessment of the included studies was conducted. Findings in brief: The Da Vinci robotic system is the leading platform in the robotic surgery market. Other new platforms have published peer-reviewed articles in the field of gynecology. Senhance® and Da Vinci SP® have the most substantial proof of their capacity to perform multi-incision and single-incision robotic surgery, respectively. Hominis® has the potential to play a major role in ultra-minimally invasive and scarless approaches. Conclusions: The significant advantages of Intuitive’s robots justify their worldwide dissemination. However, their drawbacks have motivated other companies to develop innovative solutions. Our research shows that the majority of these new platforms are still at the beginning of their technical and scientific validation but seem very promising.</description><subject>edge sp1000</subject><subject>flex</subject><subject>hominis</subject><subject>multi-port</subject><subject>revo-i</subject><subject>robotic surgery</subject><subject>senhance</subject><subject>single-port</subject><subject>single-site</subject><subject>versius</subject><issn>0390-6663</issn><issn>2709-0094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFa3rucPJM7Hy0xmJaVoLRQrorgcJsmbNCHNyCQo_feGVsTNPXAXh_cuIbecpZKzXN61aYmhBsO5AHVGZkIzkzBm4JzMmDQsUUrJS3I1DC1jAFrxGdk-4zd9DUUYm5K-dG70Ie4HOiVdHXosQxfqQ0oXEekH0kW5a_Cr6Wu67ZEGT8cd0lXoKuwnuG64vyYXfiLe_HJO3h8f3pZPyWa7Wi8Xm6SUjI3JdCQAA4PojVMavM8y7lFD5QVkXnvvshydRKnAYa7BFcb7IiuFVlLmmZyT9clbBdfaz9jsXTzY4Bp7LEKsrYvTTx1akSMKDYXQhQaljOHSQ55XheSoJ_fkSk-uMoZhiOj_fJzZ47S2tf-mlT8OkWuh</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Farinha, Rui</creator><creator>Sarchi, Luca</creator><creator>Paciotti, Marco</creator><creator>Bravi, Carlo Andrea</creator><creator>Mottaran, Angelo</creator><creator>Piro, Adele</creator><creator>Nocera, Luigi</creator><creator>Calcagnile, Tommaso</creator><creator>Assumma, Simone</creator><creator>Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara</creator><creator>Yadav, Siddhart</creator><creator>Terzoni, Stefano</creator><creator>Puliatti, Stefano</creator><creator>Koukourikis, Periklis</creator><creator>Groote, Ruben De</creator><creator>Faustino, Fátima</creator><creator>Naeyer, Geert De</creator><creator>Gaia, Giorgia</creator><creator>Rocco, Bernardo</creator><creator>Mottrie, Alexandre</creator><general>IMR Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>New Robotic Platforms for Gynecology. Are We Achieving One of the Golden Goals?</title><author>Farinha, Rui ; Sarchi, Luca ; Paciotti, Marco ; Bravi, Carlo Andrea ; Mottaran, Angelo ; Piro, Adele ; Nocera, Luigi ; Calcagnile, Tommaso ; Assumma, Simone ; Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara ; Yadav, Siddhart ; Terzoni, Stefano ; Puliatti, Stefano ; Koukourikis, Periklis ; Groote, Ruben De ; Faustino, Fátima ; Naeyer, Geert De ; Gaia, Giorgia ; Rocco, Bernardo ; Mottrie, Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-49144049eef9a674ff551fe74df245f7ffa58ea3e364ae874ab9ffb5c27633853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>edge sp1000</topic><topic>flex</topic><topic>hominis</topic><topic>multi-port</topic><topic>revo-i</topic><topic>robotic surgery</topic><topic>senhance</topic><topic>single-port</topic><topic>single-site</topic><topic>versius</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farinha, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarchi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paciotti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravi, Carlo Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottaran, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piro, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nocera, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calcagnile, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assumma, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Siddhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terzoni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puliatti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koukourikis, Periklis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groote, Ruben De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faustino, Fátima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naeyer, Geert De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaia, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocco, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farinha, Rui</au><au>Sarchi, Luca</au><au>Paciotti, Marco</au><au>Bravi, Carlo Andrea</au><au>Mottaran, Angelo</au><au>Piro, Adele</au><au>Nocera, Luigi</au><au>Calcagnile, Tommaso</au><au>Assumma, Simone</au><au>Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara</au><au>Yadav, Siddhart</au><au>Terzoni, Stefano</au><au>Puliatti, Stefano</au><au>Koukourikis, Periklis</au><au>Groote, Ruben De</au><au>Faustino, Fátima</au><au>Naeyer, Geert De</au><au>Gaia, Giorgia</au><au>Rocco, Bernardo</au><au>Mottrie, Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Robotic Platforms for Gynecology. Are We Achieving One of the Golden Goals?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>246</spage><pages>246-</pages><issn>0390-6663</issn><eissn>2709-0094</eissn><abstract>Objective: To summarize the scientific published literature on new robotic platforms with potential use in gynecology and review their evolution from inception until the present day. The goal was to describe the current characteristics and possible prospects of these platforms. Mechanism: A non-systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify scientific literature on new robotic platforms and review their evolution from inception until January 2022. Only English-language publications were included in this analysis. The following keywords were used: “new robotic platforms”, “robot”, “Revo-I”, “Versius®”, “Senhance®”, “Single-Site”, “Single-Port”, “Multi-Port”, “EDGE SP1000”, “Flex®”, and “Hominis®”. Abstract reviews were conducted to determine the relevance of the review aims. Full-text analysis of all relevant English-language original articles was subsequently performed by one author (R.F.) and summarized after discussion with an independent third party (L.S., M.P.). No formal quality assessment of the included studies was conducted. Findings in brief: The Da Vinci robotic system is the leading platform in the robotic surgery market. Other new platforms have published peer-reviewed articles in the field of gynecology. Senhance® and Da Vinci SP® have the most substantial proof of their capacity to perform multi-incision and single-incision robotic surgery, respectively. Hominis® has the potential to play a major role in ultra-minimally invasive and scarless approaches. Conclusions: The significant advantages of Intuitive’s robots justify their worldwide dissemination. However, their drawbacks have motivated other companies to develop innovative solutions. Our research shows that the majority of these new platforms are still at the beginning of their technical and scientific validation but seem very promising.</abstract><pub>IMR Press</pub><doi>10.31083/j.ceog4911246</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0390-6663 |
ispartof | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology, 2022-11, Vol.49 (11), p.246 |
issn | 0390-6663 2709-0094 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_28ee274b27b74669913f488db31e7e87 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | edge sp1000 flex hominis multi-port revo-i robotic surgery senhance single-port single-site versius |
title | New Robotic Platforms for Gynecology. Are We Achieving One of the Golden Goals? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A05%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Robotic%20Platforms%20for%20Gynecology.%20Are%20We%20Achieving%20One%20of%20the%20Golden%20Goals?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Farinha,%20Rui&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=246&rft.pages=246-&rft.issn=0390-6663&rft.eissn=2709-0094&rft_id=info:doi/10.31083/j.ceog4911246&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_28ee274b27b74669913f488db31e7e87%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-49144049eef9a674ff551fe74df245f7ffa58ea3e364ae874ab9ffb5c27633853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |