Why patients fail to achieve a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after total shoulder arthroplasty?

• Published in: JSES international 2022-01, Vol.6 (1), p.49-55
• Main Authors: Cole, Elliott W., Moulton, Samuel G., Werner, Brian C., Denard, Patrick J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; ASES; PASS; Patient Acceptable Symptom State; SANE; Shoulder; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; Total shoulder arthroplasty; TSA
• ISSN: 2666-6383; 2666-6383
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.017

The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) measurements between patients achieving and failing to achieve a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to determine which PRO questions and ROM measurements were the primary drivers of poor outcomes. A retrospective review of a multicenter database identified 301 patients who had undergone primary TSA between 2015 and 2018 with ROM and PRO data recorded preoperatively and at a minimum of two years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the difference in active ROM between patients achieving and failing to achieve the PASS threshold for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. The secondary outcome was the difference in self-reported pain levels between those achieving and failing to achieve a PASS. Based on the ASES PASS threshold, 87% (261/301) of patients achieved a PASS after TSA, whereas 13% did not. Based on the SANE PASS threshold, 69% (208/301) of patients achieved a PASS after TSA, whereas 31% did not. Patients who failed to achieve a PASS after TSA were younger and had lower short form-12 mental health scores than those who did. There was a significant difference in pain between those who achieved and failed to achieve a PASS after TSA (ASES PASS current shoulder pain 16.5% vs. 95%, P