Adjusted planning based on the joint line convergence angle improves correction accuracy in the standing position after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2024-09, Vol.19 (1), p.598-9, Article 598
• Main Authors: Kumagai, Ken, Yamada, Shunsuke, Nejima, Shuntaro, Choe, Hyonmin, Ike, Hiroyuki, Kobayashi, Naomi, Inaba, Yutaka
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Correction accuracy; Female; Humans; Joint line convergence angle; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Osteotomy; Osteotomy - methods; Preoperative planning; Retrospective Studies; Standing Position; Tibia - diagnostic imaging; Tibia - surgery
• ISSN: 1749-799X; 1749-799X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05096-x

Postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) is known to be a factor affecting correction error in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The purpose of this study was to assess whether preoperative planning that considers change of the JLCA can achieve accurate correction in the standing position after OWHTO. OWHTO was performed for 109 knees with osteoarthritis of the knee. The amount of angular correction was planned aiming to achieve mechanical valgus of 5° in 55 knees (conventional planning), and it was adjusted in 54 knees (adjusted planning) according to the preoperative JLCA as follows: not changed with JLCA ≤ 3°; decreased 1° with JLCA 4-6°; decreased 2° with JLCA 7-8°; and decreased 3° with JLCA ≥ 9°. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, JLCA, and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing long-leg radiographs. Correction error ≤ 2º was defined as the acceptable range, and correction error > 2º was defined as an outlier. The conventional planning group had a significantly greater postoperative HKA angle than the adjusted planning group (6.1º and 4.9º, respectively). The mean JLCA decreased from 4.8º to 2.6º in the conventional planning group and from 4.6º to 2.7º in the adjusted planning group. The conventional planning group had significantly greater postoperative MPTA than the adjusted planning group (96.2º and 94.7º, respectively). The rate of outliers with correction error > 2º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (9%) than in the conventional planning group (24%). The rate of the MPTA > 95º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (30%) than in the conventional planning group (69%). This study demonstrated that preoperative planning with adjustment of the correction angle according to the preoperative JLCA improved correction accuracy in the standing position after OWHTO.