Loading…

Depth perception between dots and the background face reduces trypophobic discomfort

Studies have shown that viewing a cluster of dots evokes feelings of discomfort in viewers and that the discomfort becomes especially strong when the dots are placed on background images of human skin. This phenomenon has been explained by the physical properties and spatial and semantic relationshi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Psychology 2022-12, Vol.10 (1), p.291-291, Article 291
Main Authors: Song, Nanxin, Koyama, Shinichi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113
container_end_page 291
container_issue 1
container_start_page 291
container_title BMC Psychology
container_volume 10
creator Song, Nanxin
Koyama, Shinichi
description Studies have shown that viewing a cluster of dots evokes feelings of discomfort in viewers and that the discomfort becomes especially strong when the dots are placed on background images of human skin. This phenomenon has been explained by the physical properties and spatial and semantic relationships between the dots and the background. However, it was not known whether the perceived, as well as the physical, spatial relationships contributes to the generation of discomfort. We evoked illusory depth perception between black dots and the background face by drawing shadow-like gray dots around the black dots, while keeping the same black dots at the same positions, and examined whether illusory depth perception could increase or decrease discomfort. In each trial, participants viewed one of the following types of facial images: (a) face-only (face without dots), (b) a cluster of black dots on the face, (c) a cluster of gray dots on the face, and (d) a cluster of black dots and shadow-like gray dots on the face. After seeing each picture, they evaluated how much discomfort they felt from viewing the picture using a Likert scale and reported whether they perceived depth between the dots and the face. Participants felt discomfort toward all three types of faces with dots, that is, faces with black dots, gray dots, and both. However, interestingly, participants felt less discomfort when both black and gray dots were presented on the face than when only black dots were presented. The participants perceived depth between the black dots and the face in 85% of the trials with black dots and shadow-like gray dots, and there was a significant correlation between discomfort and frequency of depth perception. However, in the trials with black dots only and gray dots only, they perceived depth in only 18% and 27% of the trials, respectively, and the correlations between the frequencies of depth perception and discomfort were not significant. Our results suggest that the perceived spatial relationship, such as attached vs. separate, as well as the physical spatial relationship, contribute to the generation of discomfort.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40359-022-01006-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2a2bbc683f7e42c38f7d61078661a3ce</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A729169376</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2a2bbc683f7e42c38f7d61078661a3ce</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A729169376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1TAQhiMEotWhL8ACRUJCsEjxJbHjDVJVbkeqVAkKW8uxJ5dDEqe2A_TtcXpKOUEskBce29_8tmf-JHmK0SnGJXvtc0QLkSFCMoQRYhl6kBwTVKCMk5I-PIiPkhPvdwghjCmigjxOjijLeU44Pk6u3sIU2nQCp2PQ2TGtIPwAGFNjg0_VaNLQQlop_a1xdo7LWmlIHZhZg0-Du5ns1Nqq06npvLZDbV14kjyqVe_h5G7eJF_ev7s6_5hdXH7Ynp9dZJojErJCF6QWHGOWk7ysSyVKZkohKOQGEUA850IzZRBwreKLjaAmL6pS65hSxd9sku1e11i1k5PrBuVupFWdvN2wrpHKhU73IIkiVaVZSWsOOdG0rLlhGPGSMayohqj1Zq81zdUARsMYnOpXouuTsWtlY79LwQkXVESBl3cCzl7P4IMcYkGg79UIdvaS8IISgUjs2yZ5_he6s7MbY6kWqmBIFIT8oRoVP9CNtY336kVUnnEiMBOUs0id_oOKw8DQaTtC3cX9VcKrVUJkAvwMjZq9l9vPn_6fvfy6Zl8csC2oPrTe9vNiKr8GyR7UznrvoL4vMkZy8bbce1tGb8tbb8ulZM8O23Of8tvJ9Bc39e_-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755609522</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Depth perception between dots and the background face reduces trypophobic discomfort</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Song, Nanxin ; Koyama, Shinichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Nanxin ; Koyama, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><description>Studies have shown that viewing a cluster of dots evokes feelings of discomfort in viewers and that the discomfort becomes especially strong when the dots are placed on background images of human skin. This phenomenon has been explained by the physical properties and spatial and semantic relationships between the dots and the background. However, it was not known whether the perceived, as well as the physical, spatial relationships contributes to the generation of discomfort. We evoked illusory depth perception between black dots and the background face by drawing shadow-like gray dots around the black dots, while keeping the same black dots at the same positions, and examined whether illusory depth perception could increase or decrease discomfort. In each trial, participants viewed one of the following types of facial images: (a) face-only (face without dots), (b) a cluster of black dots on the face, (c) a cluster of gray dots on the face, and (d) a cluster of black dots and shadow-like gray dots on the face. After seeing each picture, they evaluated how much discomfort they felt from viewing the picture using a Likert scale and reported whether they perceived depth between the dots and the face. Participants felt discomfort toward all three types of faces with dots, that is, faces with black dots, gray dots, and both. However, interestingly, participants felt less discomfort when both black and gray dots were presented on the face than when only black dots were presented. The participants perceived depth between the black dots and the face in 85% of the trials with black dots and shadow-like gray dots, and there was a significant correlation between discomfort and frequency of depth perception. However, in the trials with black dots only and gray dots only, they perceived depth in only 18% and 27% of the trials, respectively, and the correlations between the frequencies of depth perception and discomfort were not significant. Our results suggest that the perceived spatial relationship, such as attached vs. separate, as well as the physical spatial relationship, contribute to the generation of discomfort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-7283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-7283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-01006-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36474271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Dot pattern ; Experiments ; Perception of shadow and depth ; Portable computers ; Trypophobia ; Variance analysis ; Visual discomfort ; Visual system ; White people</subject><ispartof>BMC Psychology, 2022-12, Vol.10 (1), p.291-291, Article 291</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727939/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2755609522?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Nanxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><title>Depth perception between dots and the background face reduces trypophobic discomfort</title><title>BMC Psychology</title><addtitle>BMC Psychol</addtitle><description>Studies have shown that viewing a cluster of dots evokes feelings of discomfort in viewers and that the discomfort becomes especially strong when the dots are placed on background images of human skin. This phenomenon has been explained by the physical properties and spatial and semantic relationships between the dots and the background. However, it was not known whether the perceived, as well as the physical, spatial relationships contributes to the generation of discomfort. We evoked illusory depth perception between black dots and the background face by drawing shadow-like gray dots around the black dots, while keeping the same black dots at the same positions, and examined whether illusory depth perception could increase or decrease discomfort. In each trial, participants viewed one of the following types of facial images: (a) face-only (face without dots), (b) a cluster of black dots on the face, (c) a cluster of gray dots on the face, and (d) a cluster of black dots and shadow-like gray dots on the face. After seeing each picture, they evaluated how much discomfort they felt from viewing the picture using a Likert scale and reported whether they perceived depth between the dots and the face. Participants felt discomfort toward all three types of faces with dots, that is, faces with black dots, gray dots, and both. However, interestingly, participants felt less discomfort when both black and gray dots were presented on the face than when only black dots were presented. The participants perceived depth between the black dots and the face in 85% of the trials with black dots and shadow-like gray dots, and there was a significant correlation between discomfort and frequency of depth perception. However, in the trials with black dots only and gray dots only, they perceived depth in only 18% and 27% of the trials, respectively, and the correlations between the frequencies of depth perception and discomfort were not significant. Our results suggest that the perceived spatial relationship, such as attached vs. separate, as well as the physical spatial relationship, contribute to the generation of discomfort.</description><subject>Dot pattern</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Perception of shadow and depth</subject><subject>Portable computers</subject><subject>Trypophobia</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Visual discomfort</subject><subject>Visual system</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>2050-7283</issn><issn>2050-7283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1TAQhiMEotWhL8ACRUJCsEjxJbHjDVJVbkeqVAkKW8uxJ5dDEqe2A_TtcXpKOUEskBce29_8tmf-JHmK0SnGJXvtc0QLkSFCMoQRYhl6kBwTVKCMk5I-PIiPkhPvdwghjCmigjxOjijLeU44Pk6u3sIU2nQCp2PQ2TGtIPwAGFNjg0_VaNLQQlop_a1xdo7LWmlIHZhZg0-Du5ns1Nqq06npvLZDbV14kjyqVe_h5G7eJF_ev7s6_5hdXH7Ynp9dZJojErJCF6QWHGOWk7ysSyVKZkohKOQGEUA850IzZRBwreKLjaAmL6pS65hSxd9sku1e11i1k5PrBuVupFWdvN2wrpHKhU73IIkiVaVZSWsOOdG0rLlhGPGSMayohqj1Zq81zdUARsMYnOpXouuTsWtlY79LwQkXVESBl3cCzl7P4IMcYkGg79UIdvaS8IISgUjs2yZ5_he6s7MbY6kWqmBIFIT8oRoVP9CNtY336kVUnnEiMBOUs0id_oOKw8DQaTtC3cX9VcKrVUJkAvwMjZq9l9vPn_6fvfy6Zl8csC2oPrTe9vNiKr8GyR7UznrvoL4vMkZy8bbce1tGb8tbb8ulZM8O23Of8tvJ9Bc39e_-</recordid><startdate>20221206</startdate><enddate>20221206</enddate><creator>Song, Nanxin</creator><creator>Koyama, Shinichi</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221206</creationdate><title>Depth perception between dots and the background face reduces trypophobic discomfort</title><author>Song, Nanxin ; Koyama, Shinichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dot pattern</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Perception of shadow and depth</topic><topic>Portable computers</topic><topic>Trypophobia</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Visual discomfort</topic><topic>Visual system</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Nanxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC Psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Nanxin</au><au>Koyama, Shinichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Depth perception between dots and the background face reduces trypophobic discomfort</atitle><jtitle>BMC Psychology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-12-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>291-291</pages><artnum>291</artnum><issn>2050-7283</issn><eissn>2050-7283</eissn><abstract>Studies have shown that viewing a cluster of dots evokes feelings of discomfort in viewers and that the discomfort becomes especially strong when the dots are placed on background images of human skin. This phenomenon has been explained by the physical properties and spatial and semantic relationships between the dots and the background. However, it was not known whether the perceived, as well as the physical, spatial relationships contributes to the generation of discomfort. We evoked illusory depth perception between black dots and the background face by drawing shadow-like gray dots around the black dots, while keeping the same black dots at the same positions, and examined whether illusory depth perception could increase or decrease discomfort. In each trial, participants viewed one of the following types of facial images: (a) face-only (face without dots), (b) a cluster of black dots on the face, (c) a cluster of gray dots on the face, and (d) a cluster of black dots and shadow-like gray dots on the face. After seeing each picture, they evaluated how much discomfort they felt from viewing the picture using a Likert scale and reported whether they perceived depth between the dots and the face. Participants felt discomfort toward all three types of faces with dots, that is, faces with black dots, gray dots, and both. However, interestingly, participants felt less discomfort when both black and gray dots were presented on the face than when only black dots were presented. The participants perceived depth between the black dots and the face in 85% of the trials with black dots and shadow-like gray dots, and there was a significant correlation between discomfort and frequency of depth perception. However, in the trials with black dots only and gray dots only, they perceived depth in only 18% and 27% of the trials, respectively, and the correlations between the frequencies of depth perception and discomfort were not significant. Our results suggest that the perceived spatial relationship, such as attached vs. separate, as well as the physical spatial relationship, contribute to the generation of discomfort.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>36474271</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40359-022-01006-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-7283
ispartof BMC Psychology, 2022-12, Vol.10 (1), p.291-291, Article 291
issn 2050-7283
2050-7283
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2a2bbc683f7e42c38f7d61078661a3ce
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (PMC)
subjects Dot pattern
Experiments
Perception of shadow and depth
Portable computers
Trypophobia
Variance analysis
Visual discomfort
Visual system
White people
title Depth perception between dots and the background face reduces trypophobic discomfort
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A35%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Depth%20perception%20between%20dots%20and%20the%20background%20face%20reduces%20trypophobic%20discomfort&rft.jtitle=BMC%20Psychology&rft.au=Song,%20Nanxin&rft.date=2022-12-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=291-291&rft.artnum=291&rft.issn=2050-7283&rft.eissn=2050-7283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40359-022-01006-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA729169376%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c702t-5c52f971164248f8a986d8993e4d02e07479c6ad0e7ca647d93d45b8cc116b113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755609522&rft_id=info:pmid/36474271&rft_galeid=A729169376&rfr_iscdi=true