Comparison of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy as different systemic treatment modes for metastatic luminal HER2-negative breast cancer patients —A retrospective study

• Published in: Frontiers in oncology 2022-07, Vol.12, p.873570-873570
• Main Authors: Liu, Qiuyue, Qiu, Juan, Lu, Qianrun, Ma, Yujin, Fang, Shu, Bu, Bing, Song, Lihua
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: chemotherapy; endocrine therapy; metastatic breast cancer; Oncology; prognosis; systemic treatment modes
• ISSN: 2234-943X; 2234-943X
• DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873570

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for first-line, maintenance, and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+HER-2-MBC) and the relationship between different treatment options and survival. Patients and methodsThe patients included in this study were all diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) at Shandong Cancer Hospital from January 2013 to June 2017. Of the 951 patients with MBC, 307 patients with HR+HER-2-MBC were included in the analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the various treatment modes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. Because of the imbalance in data, we used the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) algorithm to oversample the data to increase the balanced amount of data. ResultsThis retrospective study included 307 patients with HR+HER-2-MBC; 246 patients (80.13%) and 61 patients (19.87%) were treated with first-line chemotherapy and first-line endocrine therapy, respectively. First-line endocrine therapy was better than first-line chemotherapy in terms of PFS and OS. After adjusting for known prognostic factors, patients receiving first-line chemotherapy had poorer PFS and OS outcomes than patients receiving first-line endocrine therapy. In terms of maintenance treatment, the endocrine therapy-endocrine therapy maintenance mode achieved the best prognosis, followed by the chemotherapy-endocrine therapy maintenance mode and chemotherapy-chemotherapy maintenance mode, and the no-maintenance mode has resulted in the worst prognosis. In terms of first-line/second-line treatment, the endocrine therapy/endocrine therapy mode achieved the best prognosis, while the chemotherapy/chemotherapy mode resulted in the worst prognosis. The chemotherapy/endocrine therapy mode achieved a better prognosis than the endocrine therapy/chemotherapy mode. There were no significant differences in the KI-67 index (