Whole exome sequencing establishes diagnosis of Charcot–Marie–Tooth 4J, 1C, and X1 subtypes

• Published in: Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2020-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e1141-n/a
• Main Authors: Michaelidou, Kleita, Tsiverdis, Ioannis, Erimaki, Sophia, Papadimitriou, Dimitra, Amoiridis, Georgios, Papadimitriou, Alexandros, Mitsias, Panayiotis, Zaganas, Ioannis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Age; Aged; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Atrophy; Biopsy; Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease - classification; Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease - diagnosis; Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease - genetics; Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease; Connexins - genetics; Data analysis; Deoxyribonucleic acid; Diagnosis; Diagnostic systems; DNA; Dystonia; Electromyography; Exome Sequencing - methods; Extremities; Flavoproteins - genetics; Gait; Gap Junction beta-1 Protein; Gene deletion; Genes; Genetic analysis; Genetic Testing - methods; genetics; Genomes; Gjb1 gene; Humans; inherited polyneuropathy; Laboratories; LITAF protein; Male; Mutation, Missense; Nuclear Proteins - genetics; Original; Ostomy; Patients; Peripheral myelin protein 22; Phenotype; Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases - genetics; Polyneuropathy; Reproduction (copying); Transcription Factors - genetics; whole exome sequencing
• ISSN: 2324-9269; 2324-9269
• DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1141

Background Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) hereditary polyneuropathies pose a diagnostic challenge. Our aim here is to describe CMT patients diagnosed by whole exome sequencing (WES) following years of fruitless testing. Methods/Results Three patients with polyneuropathy suspected to be genetic in origin, but not harboring PMP22 gene deletion/duplication, were offered WES. The first patient, a 66‐year‐old man, had been suffering from progressive weakness and atrophies in the lower and upper extremities for 20 years. Due to ambiguous electrophysiological findings, immune therapies were administered to no avail. Twelve years after PMP22 deletion/duplication testing, WES revealed two pathogenic variants in the FIG4 gene (p.Ile41Thr and p.Phe598fs, respectively), as a cause of CMT 4J. The second patient, a 19‐year‐old man, had been suffering from hearing and gait impairment since at least his infancy, and recently presented with weakness and dystonia of the lower extremities. In this patient, WES identified the p.Leu122Val LITAF gene variant in heterozygous state, suggesting the diagnosis of CMT 1C, several years after initial genetic analyses. The third patient, a 44‐year‐old man, presented with progressive weakness and atrophies of the lower and upper extremities since the age of 17 years old. In this patient, WES identified the hemizygous p.Arg164Gln pathogenic variant in the GJB1 gene, establishing the diagnosis of CMT X1, 8 years after testing for PMP22 deletion/duplication. Conclusion Novel diagnostic techniques, such as WES, offer the possibility to decipher the cause of CMT subtypes, ending the diagnostic Odyssey of the patients and sparing them from unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments. Here we describe three cases of Charcot–Marie–Tooth hereditary polyneuropathy (subtypes 4J, 1C, and X1, respectively) that we have diagnosed using whole exome sequencing (WES) after several years of nondiagnostic genetic and nongenetic tests. These cases demonstrate the advantages of a simplified strategy in diagnosing hereditary peripheral neuropathies, namely proceeding directly from PMP22 deletion/duplication analysis to WES for the diagnostic evaluation of these patients.