Loading…

A Comparative Analysis of the Temperature‐Mortality Risks Using Different Weather Datasets Across Heterogeneous Regions

New gridded climate datasets (GCDs) on spatially resolved modeled weather data have recently been released to explore the impacts of climate change. GCDs have been suggested as potential alternatives to weather station data in epidemiological assessments on health impacts of temperature and climate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geohealth 2021-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e2020GH000363-n/a
Main Authors: de Schrijver, Evan, Folly, Christophe L., Schneider, Rochelle, Royé, Dominic, Franco, Oscar H., Gasparrini, Antonio, Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2020GH000363
container_title Geohealth
container_volume 5
creator de Schrijver, Evan
Folly, Christophe L.
Schneider, Rochelle
Royé, Dominic
Franco, Oscar H.
Gasparrini, Antonio
Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.
description New gridded climate datasets (GCDs) on spatially resolved modeled weather data have recently been released to explore the impacts of climate change. GCDs have been suggested as potential alternatives to weather station data in epidemiological assessments on health impacts of temperature and climate change. These can be particularly useful for assessment in regions that have remained understudied due to limited or low quality weather station data. However to date, no study has critically evaluated the application of GCDs of variable spatial resolution in temperature‐mortality assessments across regions of different orography, climate, and size. Here we explored the performance of population‐weighted daily mean temperature data from the global ERA5 reanalysis dataset in the 10 regions in the United Kingdom and the 26 cantons in Switzerland, combined with two local high‐resolution GCDs (HadUK‐grid UKPOC‐9 and MeteoSwiss‐grid‐product, respectively) and compared these to weather station data and unweighted homologous series. We applied quasi‐Poisson time series regression with distributed lag nonlinear models to obtain the GCD‐ and region‐specific temperature‐mortality associations and calculated the corresponding cold‐ and heat‐related excess mortality. Although the five exposure datasets yielded different average area‐level temperature estimates, these deviations did not result in substantial variations in the temperature‐mortality association or impacts. Moreover, local population‐weighted GCDs showed better overall performance, suggesting that they could be excellent alternatives to help advance knowledge on climate change impacts in remote regions with large climate and population distribution variability, which has remained largely unexplored in present literature due to the lack of reliable exposure data. Plain Language Summary Thus far, most studies attempting to study the impact of heat and cold on health have used data from weather stations around cities as a proxy for the temperature exposure of a population. Recently, new spatially resolved weather datasets have been released, which provide continuous temperature measurements at local or global scale, and can be particularly useful for supplying data in regions with limited or low quality weather station data. In this study, we aimed to explore the performance of these newly developed exposure datasets compared to weather stations in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, two regions which are heteroge
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2020GH000363
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2b039419392b4807adcb74c87cd4326a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2b039419392b4807adcb74c87cd4326a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2622389274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstuEzEUhkcIRKvSHWtkiS0B3-biDVKUlqRSEVIVxNLy2MdTh8k42J6i2fEIPCNPUrcpVbrpykc-nz_9PjpF8ZbgjwRT8YliipcrjDGr2IvimPKazAjH7OVBfVScxrjJDKkbKurydXHEOG64aOhxMc3Rwm93KqjkbgDNB9VP0UXkLUrXgNaw3UHujQH-_fn71YekepcmdOXiz4i-Rzd06MxZCwGGhH6Ayo8COlNJRUgRzXXwMaIVJAi-gwH8GNEVdM4P8U3xyqo-wunDeVKsv5yvF6vZ5bflxWJ-OdMVYXxmDC-1LrVpqCVWGMZY02AsAOeqFrhty9YCtNYwXNJK5SzMlKzBdd1W1rKT4mKvNV5t5C64rQqT9MrJ-wsfOqlCcroHSVvMBCeCCdryLFBGtzXXTa0NZ1mdXZ_3rt3YbsHo_Oeg-ifSp53BXcvO38iGcNYIkQXvHwTB_xohJrnxY8gzj5JWlGaG1vxZqmQUl5wLmqkPe-p-xgHsYw6C5d1yyMPlyPi7w-yP8P9VyADeA79dD9OzMrlcUUo5uwW5VMQR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2532054492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Temperature‐Mortality Risks Using Different Weather Datasets Across Heterogeneous Regions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>de Schrijver, Evan ; Folly, Christophe L. ; Schneider, Rochelle ; Royé, Dominic ; Franco, Oscar H. ; Gasparrini, Antonio ; Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Schrijver, Evan ; Folly, Christophe L. ; Schneider, Rochelle ; Royé, Dominic ; Franco, Oscar H. ; Gasparrini, Antonio ; Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><description>New gridded climate datasets (GCDs) on spatially resolved modeled weather data have recently been released to explore the impacts of climate change. GCDs have been suggested as potential alternatives to weather station data in epidemiological assessments on health impacts of temperature and climate change. These can be particularly useful for assessment in regions that have remained understudied due to limited or low quality weather station data. However to date, no study has critically evaluated the application of GCDs of variable spatial resolution in temperature‐mortality assessments across regions of different orography, climate, and size. Here we explored the performance of population‐weighted daily mean temperature data from the global ERA5 reanalysis dataset in the 10 regions in the United Kingdom and the 26 cantons in Switzerland, combined with two local high‐resolution GCDs (HadUK‐grid UKPOC‐9 and MeteoSwiss‐grid‐product, respectively) and compared these to weather station data and unweighted homologous series. We applied quasi‐Poisson time series regression with distributed lag nonlinear models to obtain the GCD‐ and region‐specific temperature‐mortality associations and calculated the corresponding cold‐ and heat‐related excess mortality. Although the five exposure datasets yielded different average area‐level temperature estimates, these deviations did not result in substantial variations in the temperature‐mortality association or impacts. Moreover, local population‐weighted GCDs showed better overall performance, suggesting that they could be excellent alternatives to help advance knowledge on climate change impacts in remote regions with large climate and population distribution variability, which has remained largely unexplored in present literature due to the lack of reliable exposure data. Plain Language Summary Thus far, most studies attempting to study the impact of heat and cold on health have used data from weather stations around cities as a proxy for the temperature exposure of a population. Recently, new spatially resolved weather datasets have been released, which provide continuous temperature measurements at local or global scale, and can be particularly useful for supplying data in regions with limited or low quality weather station data. In this study, we aimed to explore the performance of these newly developed exposure datasets compared to weather stations in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, two regions which are heterogeneous in terms of topography and population distribution. We found that despite different temperature observations the datasets yield very similar results. In particular, high‐resolution population‐weighted temperature datasets showed better performance and thus it can be a good alternative to weather stations, especially in densely populated urban areas with large intracity temperature variability. Key Points New products on spatially resolved weather datasets have become available but little is known on their suitability in health studies Here, different exposure datasets yielded similar patterns in temperature‐mortality impacts across heterogeneous areas Globally available modeled weather data could help advance knowledge on health impacts in areas with limited weather station data</description><identifier>ISSN: 2471-1403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2471-1403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020GH000363</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34084982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Climate change ; cold ; Datasets ; Environmental impact ; Epidemiology ; Estimates ; Geography ; Geohealth ; Geospatial ; Gridded climate dataset ; Health Impact ; Health risks ; heat ; Industrialized nations ; Informatics ; Local population ; Mortality ; Mortality risk ; Natural Hazards ; Orography ; Population density ; Population distribution ; Public Health ; reanalysis ; spatiotemporal analysis ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Geohealth, 2021-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e2020GH000363-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4606-4929 ; 0000-0002-2271-3568 ; 0000-0001-6982-8867 ; 0000-0002-3162-9739 ; 0000-0002-5516-6396 ; 0000-0002-2679-0464 ; 0000-0002-2905-0154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2622389274/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2622389274?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,46027,46451,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Schrijver, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folly, Christophe L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royé, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Oscar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparrini, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Temperature‐Mortality Risks Using Different Weather Datasets Across Heterogeneous Regions</title><title>Geohealth</title><addtitle>Geohealth</addtitle><description>New gridded climate datasets (GCDs) on spatially resolved modeled weather data have recently been released to explore the impacts of climate change. GCDs have been suggested as potential alternatives to weather station data in epidemiological assessments on health impacts of temperature and climate change. These can be particularly useful for assessment in regions that have remained understudied due to limited or low quality weather station data. However to date, no study has critically evaluated the application of GCDs of variable spatial resolution in temperature‐mortality assessments across regions of different orography, climate, and size. Here we explored the performance of population‐weighted daily mean temperature data from the global ERA5 reanalysis dataset in the 10 regions in the United Kingdom and the 26 cantons in Switzerland, combined with two local high‐resolution GCDs (HadUK‐grid UKPOC‐9 and MeteoSwiss‐grid‐product, respectively) and compared these to weather station data and unweighted homologous series. We applied quasi‐Poisson time series regression with distributed lag nonlinear models to obtain the GCD‐ and region‐specific temperature‐mortality associations and calculated the corresponding cold‐ and heat‐related excess mortality. Although the five exposure datasets yielded different average area‐level temperature estimates, these deviations did not result in substantial variations in the temperature‐mortality association or impacts. Moreover, local population‐weighted GCDs showed better overall performance, suggesting that they could be excellent alternatives to help advance knowledge on climate change impacts in remote regions with large climate and population distribution variability, which has remained largely unexplored in present literature due to the lack of reliable exposure data. Plain Language Summary Thus far, most studies attempting to study the impact of heat and cold on health have used data from weather stations around cities as a proxy for the temperature exposure of a population. Recently, new spatially resolved weather datasets have been released, which provide continuous temperature measurements at local or global scale, and can be particularly useful for supplying data in regions with limited or low quality weather station data. In this study, we aimed to explore the performance of these newly developed exposure datasets compared to weather stations in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, two regions which are heterogeneous in terms of topography and population distribution. We found that despite different temperature observations the datasets yield very similar results. In particular, high‐resolution population‐weighted temperature datasets showed better performance and thus it can be a good alternative to weather stations, especially in densely populated urban areas with large intracity temperature variability. Key Points New products on spatially resolved weather datasets have become available but little is known on their suitability in health studies Here, different exposure datasets yielded similar patterns in temperature‐mortality impacts across heterogeneous areas Globally available modeled weather data could help advance knowledge on health impacts in areas with limited weather station data</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>cold</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geohealth</subject><subject>Geospatial</subject><subject>Gridded climate dataset</subject><subject>Health Impact</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality risk</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Orography</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population distribution</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>reanalysis</subject><subject>spatiotemporal analysis</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>2471-1403</issn><issn>2471-1403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstuEzEUhkcIRKvSHWtkiS0B3-biDVKUlqRSEVIVxNLy2MdTh8k42J6i2fEIPCNPUrcpVbrpykc-nz_9PjpF8ZbgjwRT8YliipcrjDGr2IvimPKazAjH7OVBfVScxrjJDKkbKurydXHEOG64aOhxMc3Rwm93KqjkbgDNB9VP0UXkLUrXgNaw3UHujQH-_fn71YekepcmdOXiz4i-Rzd06MxZCwGGhH6Ayo8COlNJRUgRzXXwMaIVJAi-gwH8GNEVdM4P8U3xyqo-wunDeVKsv5yvF6vZ5bflxWJ-OdMVYXxmDC-1LrVpqCVWGMZY02AsAOeqFrhty9YCtNYwXNJK5SzMlKzBdd1W1rKT4mKvNV5t5C64rQqT9MrJ-wsfOqlCcroHSVvMBCeCCdryLFBGtzXXTa0NZ1mdXZ_3rt3YbsHo_Oeg-ifSp53BXcvO38iGcNYIkQXvHwTB_xohJrnxY8gzj5JWlGaG1vxZqmQUl5wLmqkPe-p-xgHsYw6C5d1yyMPlyPi7w-yP8P9VyADeA79dD9OzMrlcUUo5uwW5VMQR</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>de Schrijver, Evan</creator><creator>Folly, Christophe L.</creator><creator>Schneider, Rochelle</creator><creator>Royé, Dominic</creator><creator>Franco, Oscar H.</creator><creator>Gasparrini, Antonio</creator><creator>Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-4929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-3568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-8867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-9739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-6396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-0464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-0154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of the Temperature‐Mortality Risks Using Different Weather Datasets Across Heterogeneous Regions</title><author>de Schrijver, Evan ; Folly, Christophe L. ; Schneider, Rochelle ; Royé, Dominic ; Franco, Oscar H. ; Gasparrini, Antonio ; Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>cold</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geohealth</topic><topic>Geospatial</topic><topic>Gridded climate dataset</topic><topic>Health Impact</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality risk</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Orography</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population distribution</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>reanalysis</topic><topic>spatiotemporal analysis</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Schrijver, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folly, Christophe L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Rochelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royé, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Oscar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparrini, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geohealth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Schrijver, Evan</au><au>Folly, Christophe L.</au><au>Schneider, Rochelle</au><au>Royé, Dominic</au><au>Franco, Oscar H.</au><au>Gasparrini, Antonio</au><au>Vicedo‐Cabrera, Ana M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of the Temperature‐Mortality Risks Using Different Weather Datasets Across Heterogeneous Regions</atitle><jtitle>Geohealth</jtitle><addtitle>Geohealth</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2020GH000363</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2020GH000363-n/a</pages><issn>2471-1403</issn><eissn>2471-1403</eissn><abstract>New gridded climate datasets (GCDs) on spatially resolved modeled weather data have recently been released to explore the impacts of climate change. GCDs have been suggested as potential alternatives to weather station data in epidemiological assessments on health impacts of temperature and climate change. These can be particularly useful for assessment in regions that have remained understudied due to limited or low quality weather station data. However to date, no study has critically evaluated the application of GCDs of variable spatial resolution in temperature‐mortality assessments across regions of different orography, climate, and size. Here we explored the performance of population‐weighted daily mean temperature data from the global ERA5 reanalysis dataset in the 10 regions in the United Kingdom and the 26 cantons in Switzerland, combined with two local high‐resolution GCDs (HadUK‐grid UKPOC‐9 and MeteoSwiss‐grid‐product, respectively) and compared these to weather station data and unweighted homologous series. We applied quasi‐Poisson time series regression with distributed lag nonlinear models to obtain the GCD‐ and region‐specific temperature‐mortality associations and calculated the corresponding cold‐ and heat‐related excess mortality. Although the five exposure datasets yielded different average area‐level temperature estimates, these deviations did not result in substantial variations in the temperature‐mortality association or impacts. Moreover, local population‐weighted GCDs showed better overall performance, suggesting that they could be excellent alternatives to help advance knowledge on climate change impacts in remote regions with large climate and population distribution variability, which has remained largely unexplored in present literature due to the lack of reliable exposure data. Plain Language Summary Thus far, most studies attempting to study the impact of heat and cold on health have used data from weather stations around cities as a proxy for the temperature exposure of a population. Recently, new spatially resolved weather datasets have been released, which provide continuous temperature measurements at local or global scale, and can be particularly useful for supplying data in regions with limited or low quality weather station data. In this study, we aimed to explore the performance of these newly developed exposure datasets compared to weather stations in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, two regions which are heterogeneous in terms of topography and population distribution. We found that despite different temperature observations the datasets yield very similar results. In particular, high‐resolution population‐weighted temperature datasets showed better performance and thus it can be a good alternative to weather stations, especially in densely populated urban areas with large intracity temperature variability. Key Points New products on spatially resolved weather datasets have become available but little is known on their suitability in health studies Here, different exposure datasets yielded similar patterns in temperature‐mortality impacts across heterogeneous areas Globally available modeled weather data could help advance knowledge on health impacts in areas with limited weather station data</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34084982</pmid><doi>10.1029/2020GH000363</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-4929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-3568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-8867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-9739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-6396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-0464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-0154</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2471-1403
ispartof Geohealth, 2021-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e2020GH000363-n/a
issn 2471-1403
2471-1403
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2b039419392b4807adcb74c87cd4326a
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Climate change
cold
Datasets
Environmental impact
Epidemiology
Estimates
Geography
Geohealth
Geospatial
Gridded climate dataset
Health Impact
Health risks
heat
Industrialized nations
Informatics
Local population
Mortality
Mortality risk
Natural Hazards
Orography
Population density
Population distribution
Public Health
reanalysis
spatiotemporal analysis
Temperature
title A Comparative Analysis of the Temperature‐Mortality Risks Using Different Weather Datasets Across Heterogeneous Regions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Temperature%E2%80%90Mortality%20Risks%20Using%20Different%20Weather%20Datasets%20Across%20Heterogeneous%20Regions&rft.jtitle=Geohealth&rft.au=de%20Schrijver,%20Evan&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2020GH000363&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2020GH000363-n/a&rft.issn=2471-1403&rft.eissn=2471-1403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020GH000363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2622389274%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6134-dd45cc5cd82f1f9d33388009e0333790bb5bfeebfd30526affe3d538077b6ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2532054492&rft_id=info:pmid/34084982&rfr_iscdi=true