Loading…
A Comparative Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Beams
The flexural responses of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams and high-strength concrete (HSC) beams are compared in this study. A series of HSFRC and HSC beams were tested under pure flexural loading. The effects of the type of concrete, compressive strength of the concrete, and t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in materials science and engineering 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833 |
container_end_page | 13 |
container_issue | 2018 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Advances in materials science and engineering |
container_volume | 2018 |
creator | Yang, In-Hwan Kim, Kyoung-Chul Joh, Changbin |
description | The flexural responses of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams and high-strength concrete (HSC) beams are compared in this study. A series of HSFRC and HSC beams were tested under pure flexural loading. The effects of the type of concrete, compressive strength of the concrete, and tensile rebar ratio on the flexural behavior of the concrete beams were investigated. The flexural behavior of the HSFRC and HSC beams including the induced crack and failure patterns, load and deflection capacity, crack stiffness, ductility index, and flexural toughness was compared. The crack stiffness of the HSC and HSFRC beams increased with the rebar ratio. For the same rebar ratios, the crack stiffness of the HSFRC beams was much greater than that of the HSC beams. The ductility index of the HSC beams decreased sharply with an increase in the rebar ratio, but the ductility index of the HSFRC beams did not show a clear decrease with increasing rebar ratio. The flexural toughness of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams at higher rebar ratios of 1.47% and 1.97%, indicating that the energy absorption of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams. Test results also indicated that HSFRC developed better and more consistent ductility with higher rebar ratio. In addition, the tested bending strength and sectional analysis results were compared. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2018/7390798 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2b3ece3785c54dcb82640ef5b4869185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2b3ece3785c54dcb82640ef5b4869185</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2104965756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhofSQkKaW8_B0GM7jb_Hc0yWbBIIFJr2bPwh73jZHW893jT5Af3fcTphC71UFwnp4ZXE2zQfCP5CiBDnFBN13rEed7160xwTqbpWcU7fHmrGj5rTaVrjGqwXsufHze8LtEjbncmmxAdAV487yHELYzEbdF_2_gmlEZUB0HIDj_tcu5cwmIeYMkoB3cTV0N6XDOOqDGgZLeT2G8QxpOzAV-XRZSiAzOj_YQ-jSzDb6X3zLpjNBKev-aT5sbz6vrhp775e3y4u7lrHqSyt5x5Ix0FJrpQP1IEiNjAqjGWMEQm9UbaXWOAA1IBXVprAGVbMBWYVYyfN7azrk1nrXf3U5CedTNR_GimvtMklug1oahk4YJ0STnDvrKKSYwjCciV7okTV-jhr7XL6uYep6HXa57GerynBvJeiE7JSn2fK5TRNGcJhK8H6xTf94pt-9a3in2Z8iKM3v-L_6LOZhspAMH9pQolknD0D-lChpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104965756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Beams</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Yang, In-Hwan ; Kim, Kyoung-Chul ; Joh, Changbin</creator><contributor>Deng, Wen ; Wen Deng</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yang, In-Hwan ; Kim, Kyoung-Chul ; Joh, Changbin ; Deng, Wen ; Wen Deng</creatorcontrib><description>The flexural responses of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams and high-strength concrete (HSC) beams are compared in this study. A series of HSFRC and HSC beams were tested under pure flexural loading. The effects of the type of concrete, compressive strength of the concrete, and tensile rebar ratio on the flexural behavior of the concrete beams were investigated. The flexural behavior of the HSFRC and HSC beams including the induced crack and failure patterns, load and deflection capacity, crack stiffness, ductility index, and flexural toughness was compared. The crack stiffness of the HSC and HSFRC beams increased with the rebar ratio. For the same rebar ratios, the crack stiffness of the HSFRC beams was much greater than that of the HSC beams. The ductility index of the HSC beams decreased sharply with an increase in the rebar ratio, but the ductility index of the HSFRC beams did not show a clear decrease with increasing rebar ratio. The flexural toughness of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams at higher rebar ratios of 1.47% and 1.97%, indicating that the energy absorption of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams. Test results also indicated that HSFRC developed better and more consistent ductility with higher rebar ratio. In addition, the tested bending strength and sectional analysis results were compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8434</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2018/7390798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Bend strength ; Cement ; Compressive strength ; Ductility ; Ductility tests ; Energy absorption ; Fiber reinforced concretes ; Flexural strength ; Fracture toughness ; High strength concretes ; Rebar ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Repair & maintenance ; Stiffness ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Advances in materials science and engineering, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 In-Hwan Yang et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 In-Hwan Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1937-0610 ; 0000-0002-7658-8790</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2104965756/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2104965756?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Deng, Wen</contributor><contributor>Wen Deng</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yang, In-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyoung-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joh, Changbin</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Beams</title><title>Advances in materials science and engineering</title><description>The flexural responses of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams and high-strength concrete (HSC) beams are compared in this study. A series of HSFRC and HSC beams were tested under pure flexural loading. The effects of the type of concrete, compressive strength of the concrete, and tensile rebar ratio on the flexural behavior of the concrete beams were investigated. The flexural behavior of the HSFRC and HSC beams including the induced crack and failure patterns, load and deflection capacity, crack stiffness, ductility index, and flexural toughness was compared. The crack stiffness of the HSC and HSFRC beams increased with the rebar ratio. For the same rebar ratios, the crack stiffness of the HSFRC beams was much greater than that of the HSC beams. The ductility index of the HSC beams decreased sharply with an increase in the rebar ratio, but the ductility index of the HSFRC beams did not show a clear decrease with increasing rebar ratio. The flexural toughness of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams at higher rebar ratios of 1.47% and 1.97%, indicating that the energy absorption of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams. Test results also indicated that HSFRC developed better and more consistent ductility with higher rebar ratio. In addition, the tested bending strength and sectional analysis results were compared.</description><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Ductility tests</subject><subject>Energy absorption</subject><subject>Fiber reinforced concretes</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Fracture toughness</subject><subject>High strength concretes</subject><subject>Rebar</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Repair & maintenance</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1687-8434</issn><issn>1687-8442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhofSQkKaW8_B0GM7jb_Hc0yWbBIIFJr2bPwh73jZHW893jT5Af3fcTphC71UFwnp4ZXE2zQfCP5CiBDnFBN13rEed7160xwTqbpWcU7fHmrGj5rTaVrjGqwXsufHze8LtEjbncmmxAdAV487yHELYzEbdF_2_gmlEZUB0HIDj_tcu5cwmIeYMkoB3cTV0N6XDOOqDGgZLeT2G8QxpOzAV-XRZSiAzOj_YQ-jSzDb6X3zLpjNBKev-aT5sbz6vrhp775e3y4u7lrHqSyt5x5Ix0FJrpQP1IEiNjAqjGWMEQm9UbaXWOAA1IBXVprAGVbMBWYVYyfN7azrk1nrXf3U5CedTNR_GimvtMklug1oahk4YJ0STnDvrKKSYwjCciV7okTV-jhr7XL6uYep6HXa57GerynBvJeiE7JSn2fK5TRNGcJhK8H6xTf94pt-9a3in2Z8iKM3v-L_6LOZhspAMH9pQolknD0D-lChpQ</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Yang, In-Hwan</creator><creator>Kim, Kyoung-Chul</creator><creator>Joh, Changbin</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-0610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-8790</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>A Comparative Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Beams</title><author>Yang, In-Hwan ; Kim, Kyoung-Chul ; Joh, Changbin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Ductility tests</topic><topic>Energy absorption</topic><topic>Fiber reinforced concretes</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Fracture toughness</topic><topic>High strength concretes</topic><topic>Rebar</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Repair & maintenance</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, In-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyoung-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joh, Changbin</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Advances in materials science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, In-Hwan</au><au>Kim, Kyoung-Chul</au><au>Joh, Changbin</au><au>Deng, Wen</au><au>Wen Deng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Beams</atitle><jtitle>Advances in materials science and engineering</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2018</volume><issue>2018</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1687-8434</issn><eissn>1687-8442</eissn><abstract>The flexural responses of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams and high-strength concrete (HSC) beams are compared in this study. A series of HSFRC and HSC beams were tested under pure flexural loading. The effects of the type of concrete, compressive strength of the concrete, and tensile rebar ratio on the flexural behavior of the concrete beams were investigated. The flexural behavior of the HSFRC and HSC beams including the induced crack and failure patterns, load and deflection capacity, crack stiffness, ductility index, and flexural toughness was compared. The crack stiffness of the HSC and HSFRC beams increased with the rebar ratio. For the same rebar ratios, the crack stiffness of the HSFRC beams was much greater than that of the HSC beams. The ductility index of the HSC beams decreased sharply with an increase in the rebar ratio, but the ductility index of the HSFRC beams did not show a clear decrease with increasing rebar ratio. The flexural toughness of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams at higher rebar ratios of 1.47% and 1.97%, indicating that the energy absorption of the HSFRC beams was greater than that of the HSC beams. Test results also indicated that HSFRC developed better and more consistent ductility with higher rebar ratio. In addition, the tested bending strength and sectional analysis results were compared.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2018/7390798</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-0610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-8790</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1687-8434 |
ispartof | Advances in materials science and engineering, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-13 |
issn | 1687-8434 1687-8442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2b3ece3785c54dcb82640ef5b4869185 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access |
subjects | Bend strength Cement Compressive strength Ductility Ductility tests Energy absorption Fiber reinforced concretes Flexural strength Fracture toughness High strength concretes Rebar Reinforced concrete Reinforcing steels Repair & maintenance Stiffness Studies |
title | A Comparative Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Beams |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A30%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Experimental%20Study%20on%20the%20Flexural%20Behavior%20of%20High-Strength%20Fiber-Reinforced%20Concrete%20and%20High-Strength%20Concrete%20Beams&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20materials%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Yang,%20In-Hwan&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=2018&rft.issue=2018&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1687-8434&rft.eissn=1687-8442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2018/7390798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2104965756%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d4de174e86488df2ce81bf325ab33316e9a8b96050fe2aed8b6af43083cf3b833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104965756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |