Loading…

How Does the Productivity and Economic Growth Performance of China and India Compare in the Post-Reform Era, 1981-2011?

Applying an aggregate production possibility frontier (APPF) framework for growth accounting a la Jorgenson et al. to economy-wide Chinese and Indian industry productivity accounts, constructed in the spirit of the KLEMS principle, we estimate and compare growth and productivity performance in China...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International productivity monitor 2017-09 (33), p.91-113
Main Authors: Wu, Harry X, Krishna, K.L, Das, Deb Kusum, Das, Pilu Chandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Applying an aggregate production possibility frontier (APPF) framework for growth accounting a la Jorgenson et al. to economy-wide Chinese and Indian industry productivity accounts, constructed in the spirit of the KLEMS principle, we estimate and compare growth and productivity performance in China and India over their post-reform period from 1981 to 2011. We show that during this period China grew over 50 per cent-faster than India in value added (9.4 versus 6.1 per cent per annum) but about 25 per cent-slower than India in TFP (0.83 versus 1.13 per cent per annum). The two economies also experienced very different growth and productivity performances over sub-periods distinguished by special policy regimes and governing systems. While both countries appeared to enjoy their best performances in the 2002-2007 period following China's WTO entry, China faltered much more in terms of total factor productivity growth in the wake of the global financial crisis.
ISSN:1492-9759
1492-9767