Loading…

The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits

This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of soci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social inclusion 2021-01, Vol.9 (2), p.262-274
Main Author: Kurowska, Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273
container_end_page 274
container_issue 2
container_start_page 262
container_title Social inclusion
container_volume 9
creator Kurowska, Anna
description This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.17645/si.v9i2.3846
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ba2c16fe5844e04a9430bb7fd5a712f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2ba2c16fe5844e04a9430bb7fd5a712f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2540517297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtLAzEQh4MoWGqP3hc8b81zN8GTFh-Fgh56D7PZiaasm5psi_rX24eIpxlmhu83fIRcMjpldSXVdQ7TrQl8KrSsTsiIMy1Krqk4_defk0nOK0opE1UlVDUiN8s3LGaxH_Bz2EAXvrEt5r3rNjlssceci-iLF0jYD9AVC4QtFne7hQ9DviBnHrqMk986JsuH--XsqVw8P85nt4vSiZoOpaLKe-md8UxI57UDqVvDBINWomJGcwQPumll45paCk0b4zVXRoGSvBZjMj9i2wgru07hHdKXjRDsYRDTq4U0BNeh5Q1wxyqPSkuJVIKRgjZN7VsFNeN-x7o6stYpfmwwD3YVN6nffW-5klSxmpt9Ynm8cinmnND_pTJqD7ZtDnZv2-5tix8WjnIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540517297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kurowska, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2183-2803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2183-2803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i2.3846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lisbon: Cogitatio Press</publisher><subject>Access ; access to leave ; Benefits ; Employment ; Employment status ; Entitlement ; Family leave ; inclusive policy ; Operational definitions ; parental benefits ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Regulation ; Rules ; Social groups ; social indicators ; social rights ; socio‐economic context</subject><ispartof>Social inclusion, 2021-01, Vol.9 (2), p.262-274</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3578-4517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2540517297?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21394,21395,25753,27344,27866,27924,27925,33223,33611,33774,34530,37012,43733,44115,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</title><title>Social inclusion</title><description>This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>access to leave</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment status</subject><subject>Entitlement</subject><subject>Family leave</subject><subject>inclusive policy</subject><subject>Operational definitions</subject><subject>parental benefits</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Social groups</subject><subject>social indicators</subject><subject>social rights</subject><subject>socio‐economic context</subject><issn>2183-2803</issn><issn>2183-2803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtLAzEQh4MoWGqP3hc8b81zN8GTFh-Fgh56D7PZiaasm5psi_rX24eIpxlmhu83fIRcMjpldSXVdQ7TrQl8KrSsTsiIMy1Krqk4_defk0nOK0opE1UlVDUiN8s3LGaxH_Bz2EAXvrEt5r3rNjlssceci-iLF0jYD9AVC4QtFne7hQ9DviBnHrqMk986JsuH--XsqVw8P85nt4vSiZoOpaLKe-md8UxI57UDqVvDBINWomJGcwQPumll45paCk0b4zVXRoGSvBZjMj9i2wgru07hHdKXjRDsYRDTq4U0BNeh5Q1wxyqPSkuJVIKRgjZN7VsFNeN-x7o6stYpfmwwD3YVN6nffW-5klSxmpt9Ynm8cinmnND_pTJqD7ZtDnZv2-5tix8WjnIg</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Kurowska, Anna</creator><general>Cogitatio Press</general><general>Cogitatio</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-4517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</title><author>Kurowska, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>access to leave</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment status</topic><topic>Entitlement</topic><topic>Family leave</topic><topic>inclusive policy</topic><topic>Operational definitions</topic><topic>parental benefits</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Social groups</topic><topic>social indicators</topic><topic>social rights</topic><topic>socio‐economic context</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Social inclusion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurowska, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</atitle><jtitle>Social inclusion</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>262-274</pages><issn>2183-2803</issn><eissn>2183-2803</eissn><abstract>This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.</abstract><cop>Lisbon</cop><pub>Cogitatio Press</pub><doi>10.17645/si.v9i2.3846</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-4517</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2183-2803
ispartof Social inclusion, 2021-01, Vol.9 (2), p.262-274
issn 2183-2803
2183-2803
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ba2c16fe5844e04a9430bb7fd5a712f
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access
access to leave
Benefits
Employment
Employment status
Entitlement
Family leave
inclusive policy
Operational definitions
parental benefits
Parents & parenting
Regulation
Rules
Social groups
social indicators
social rights
socio‐economic context
title The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A29%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Contextualized%20Inclusiveness%20of%20Parental%20Leave%20Benefits&rft.jtitle=Social%20inclusion&rft.au=Kurowska,%20Anna&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=262-274&rft.issn=2183-2803&rft.eissn=2183-2803&rft_id=info:doi/10.17645/si.v9i2.3846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2540517297%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540517297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true