Loading…
The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits
This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of soci...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social inclusion 2021-01, Vol.9 (2), p.262-274 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273 |
container_end_page | 274 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 262 |
container_title | Social inclusion |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Kurowska, Anna |
description | This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17645/si.v9i2.3846 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ba2c16fe5844e04a9430bb7fd5a712f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2ba2c16fe5844e04a9430bb7fd5a712f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2540517297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtLAzEQh4MoWGqP3hc8b81zN8GTFh-Fgh56D7PZiaasm5psi_rX24eIpxlmhu83fIRcMjpldSXVdQ7TrQl8KrSsTsiIMy1Krqk4_defk0nOK0opE1UlVDUiN8s3LGaxH_Bz2EAXvrEt5r3rNjlssceci-iLF0jYD9AVC4QtFne7hQ9DviBnHrqMk986JsuH--XsqVw8P85nt4vSiZoOpaLKe-md8UxI57UDqVvDBINWomJGcwQPumll45paCk0b4zVXRoGSvBZjMj9i2wgru07hHdKXjRDsYRDTq4U0BNeh5Q1wxyqPSkuJVIKRgjZN7VsFNeN-x7o6stYpfmwwD3YVN6nffW-5klSxmpt9Ynm8cinmnND_pTJqD7ZtDnZv2-5tix8WjnIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540517297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kurowska, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2183-2803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2183-2803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i2.3846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lisbon: Cogitatio Press</publisher><subject>Access ; access to leave ; Benefits ; Employment ; Employment status ; Entitlement ; Family leave ; inclusive policy ; Operational definitions ; parental benefits ; Parents & parenting ; Regulation ; Rules ; Social groups ; social indicators ; social rights ; socio‐economic context</subject><ispartof>Social inclusion, 2021-01, Vol.9 (2), p.262-274</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3578-4517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2540517297?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21394,21395,25753,27344,27866,27924,27925,33223,33611,33774,34530,37012,43733,44115,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</title><title>Social inclusion</title><description>This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>access to leave</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment status</subject><subject>Entitlement</subject><subject>Family leave</subject><subject>inclusive policy</subject><subject>Operational definitions</subject><subject>parental benefits</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Social groups</subject><subject>social indicators</subject><subject>social rights</subject><subject>socio‐economic context</subject><issn>2183-2803</issn><issn>2183-2803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtLAzEQh4MoWGqP3hc8b81zN8GTFh-Fgh56D7PZiaasm5psi_rX24eIpxlmhu83fIRcMjpldSXVdQ7TrQl8KrSsTsiIMy1Krqk4_defk0nOK0opE1UlVDUiN8s3LGaxH_Bz2EAXvrEt5r3rNjlssceci-iLF0jYD9AVC4QtFne7hQ9DviBnHrqMk986JsuH--XsqVw8P85nt4vSiZoOpaLKe-md8UxI57UDqVvDBINWomJGcwQPumll45paCk0b4zVXRoGSvBZjMj9i2wgru07hHdKXjRDsYRDTq4U0BNeh5Q1wxyqPSkuJVIKRgjZN7VsFNeN-x7o6stYpfmwwD3YVN6nffW-5klSxmpt9Ynm8cinmnND_pTJqD7ZtDnZv2-5tix8WjnIg</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Kurowska, Anna</creator><general>Cogitatio Press</general><general>Cogitatio</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-4517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</title><author>Kurowska, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>access to leave</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment status</topic><topic>Entitlement</topic><topic>Family leave</topic><topic>inclusive policy</topic><topic>Operational definitions</topic><topic>parental benefits</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Social groups</topic><topic>social indicators</topic><topic>social rights</topic><topic>socio‐economic context</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Social inclusion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurowska, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits</atitle><jtitle>Social inclusion</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>262-274</pages><issn>2183-2803</issn><eissn>2183-2803</eissn><abstract>This article builds on a recent operationalization of inclusiveness of parental leave benefits proposed by Ivana Dobrotić and Sonja Blum and complements it by developing indicators of contextualized inclusiveness. This contextualized approach sets the formal entitlement and eligibility rules of social rights to parental leave benefits in the relevant socio‐economic context of the country to which these rules apply. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which parts of the country’s population are actually excluded or are at risk of being excluded from access to parental leave at a given moment in time. This is strongly shaped by, among other factors, the structure of the population according to employment status, job tenure or type of contract. An important characteristic of the methodological approach adopted in this article is that the proposed contextualized indicators are based on easily and publicly available and internationally comparable data. This makes the approach easily applicable by wide audiences, academic and practice‐oriented ones alike. The proposed indicators are then applied to sixteen European countries and show a much more diversified and nuanced landscape of contextualized inclusiveness of parental leave entitlements in Europe than the comparison of formal inclusiveness done by Dobrotić and Blum suggested. This study also shows that higher formal inclusiveness of employment‐based parental leave benefits was more common in countries with higher shares of those social groups that, in case of less inclusive regulations, would not have access to parental benefits.</abstract><cop>Lisbon</cop><pub>Cogitatio Press</pub><doi>10.17645/si.v9i2.3846</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-4517</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2183-2803 |
ispartof | Social inclusion, 2021-01, Vol.9 (2), p.262-274 |
issn | 2183-2803 2183-2803 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ba2c16fe5844e04a9430bb7fd5a712f |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Access access to leave Benefits Employment Employment status Entitlement Family leave inclusive policy Operational definitions parental benefits Parents & parenting Regulation Rules Social groups social indicators social rights socio‐economic context |
title | The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A29%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Contextualized%20Inclusiveness%20of%20Parental%20Leave%20Benefits&rft.jtitle=Social%20inclusion&rft.au=Kurowska,%20Anna&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=262-274&rft.issn=2183-2803&rft.eissn=2183-2803&rft_id=info:doi/10.17645/si.v9i2.3846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2540517297%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-505ff4fc9f134cf8ca48d9131ad4e51982eafa8bd4bcb74380b9f82595a54273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540517297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |