Marriage as Institution

• Published in: Religions (Basel, Switzerland ) Switzerland ), 2024-06, Vol.15 (6), p.675
• Main Author: Danani, Carla
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Consciousness; function; Habitus; institution; Institutions; Marriage; Narcissism; Philosophy; relationship; Rites of passage; ritual; Rituals; Violence; wedding
• ISSN: 2077-1444
• DOI: 10.3390/rel15060675

The text develops philosophical considerations on the “institutional” dimension of marriage. First of all, the meaning of “institution” is problematized, as it is so much disputed and controversially interpreted today. On the one hand, in fact, it is circumscribed to denote a repressive reality—restraining, delaying, even disciplining—considered necessary and rescuing by some scholars, yet harmful and dangerous by others. On the other hand, accentuating its verbal form, “institution” is also understood in terms of movement, as the novelty that results from the act of instituting, as a discontinuity that opens a field of possibilities. Paul Ricœur considers institutions as part of the ethical tripod, i.e., of the ways through which human beings can flourish. In the context of these divergent understandings, this paper secondly considers the possibility to speak of marriage as an institution and to take marriage rituals as an example both of rite of passage and aggregation rituals. Bourdieu says that the separation achieved in rituals has a “consecrating” effect. Third, the paper questions whether functional and symbolic changes in marriage and marriage rituals can affect their institutional status and problematize their consequences.