Loading…

Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany

Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC geriatrics 2020-03, Vol.20 (1), p.116-116, Article 116
Main Authors: Straßner, Cornelia, Mahler, Cornelia, Strauß, Beate, Wehrmann, Ulrich, Krug, Katja, Szecsenyi, Joachim, Haefeli, Walter Emil, Seidling, Hanna Marita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363
container_end_page 116
container_issue 1
container_start_page 116
container_title BMC geriatrics
container_volume 20
creator Straßner, Cornelia
Mahler, Cornelia
Strauß, Beate
Wehrmann, Ulrich
Krug, Katja
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Haefeli, Walter Emil
Seidling, Hanna Marita
description Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens' medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for "General Overuse", "General Usefulness" and "General Harm". The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. No statistically significant change in citizens' medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens' general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12877-020-01513-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2cac5825f291478da11cc2a79d6896c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A627422601</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2cac5825f291478da11cc2a79d6896c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A627422601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFTEQhhdRbK3-AS8k4I03W_O1SfZGKaXWQkUQvQ45yeQ0h92kJrvF_ffN6altj0guEmbeeYaZvE3zluBjQpT4WAhVUraY4haTjrB2edYcEi5JSxlRz5-8D5pXpWwwJlJR8bI5YJRSxZU4bP58AxesmUKKaAVDAF-QiQ7NBVDyaHzMDqFMBbUoFDRdQQZkkE0xgt1mP6MfUOahCnxOY02twKcMbUW1xk-QUZlmt6AQ0Tnk0cTldfPCm6HAm_v7qPn15ezn6df28vv5xenJZWs7waa2dw6ok8oIxcArLmwHXDKspOu46hhnIDEQYk2vVgAWMFfYEG8IZZYzwY6aix3XJbPR1zmMJi86maDvAimvtclTsANoao3tFO087evmlDMVa6mRvROqr40r69OOdT2v6mYsxCmbYQ-6n4nhSq_TjZYEC4VxBXy4B-T0e4Yy6TEUC8NgIqS5aMpUR4Xs-bbX-3-kmzTnWFdVVT1huOspf1StTR0gRJ9qX7uF6hNBJadUYFJVx_9R1eNgDPUTwYca3yuguwKbUykZ_MOMBOut9_TOe7p6T995Ty-16N3T7TyU_DUbuwV7ptOS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391305924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content</source><creator>Straßner, Cornelia ; Mahler, Cornelia ; Strauß, Beate ; Wehrmann, Ulrich ; Krug, Katja ; Szecsenyi, Joachim ; Haefeli, Walter Emil ; Seidling, Hanna Marita</creator><creatorcontrib>Straßner, Cornelia ; Mahler, Cornelia ; Strauß, Beate ; Wehrmann, Ulrich ; Krug, Katja ; Szecsenyi, Joachim ; Haefeli, Walter Emil ; Seidling, Hanna Marita</creatorcontrib><description>Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens' medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for "General Overuse", "General Usefulness" and "General Harm". The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. No statistically significant change in citizens' medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens' general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01513-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32228486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analysis ; Behavior modification ; Behaviour change ; Campaign ; Drug administration ; Drug stores ; Drug therapy ; Drugs ; Geriatrics ; Germany ; Health care industry ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Medication beliefs ; Medication Errors ; Medication list ; Medication reconciliation ; Nonprescription Drugs ; Older people ; Over-the-counter drugs ; Patients ; Pharmacy ; Polypharmacy ; Prescription drugs ; Professional ethics ; Questionnaires ; Statistical analysis ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>BMC geriatrics, 2020-03, Vol.20 (1), p.116-116, Article 116</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106800/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2391305924?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Straßner, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahler, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauß, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehrmann, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krug, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szecsenyi, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haefeli, Walter Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidling, Hanna Marita</creatorcontrib><title>Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany</title><title>BMC geriatrics</title><addtitle>BMC Geriatr</addtitle><description>Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens' medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for "General Overuse", "General Usefulness" and "General Harm". The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. No statistically significant change in citizens' medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens' general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Behaviour change</subject><subject>Campaign</subject><subject>Drug administration</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medication beliefs</subject><subject>Medication Errors</subject><subject>Medication list</subject><subject>Medication reconciliation</subject><subject>Nonprescription Drugs</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Over-the-counter drugs</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1471-2318</issn><issn>1471-2318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFTEQhhdRbK3-AS8k4I03W_O1SfZGKaXWQkUQvQ45yeQ0h92kJrvF_ffN6altj0guEmbeeYaZvE3zluBjQpT4WAhVUraY4haTjrB2edYcEi5JSxlRz5-8D5pXpWwwJlJR8bI5YJRSxZU4bP58AxesmUKKaAVDAF-QiQ7NBVDyaHzMDqFMBbUoFDRdQQZkkE0xgt1mP6MfUOahCnxOY02twKcMbUW1xk-QUZlmt6AQ0Tnk0cTldfPCm6HAm_v7qPn15ezn6df28vv5xenJZWs7waa2dw6ok8oIxcArLmwHXDKspOu46hhnIDEQYk2vVgAWMFfYEG8IZZYzwY6aix3XJbPR1zmMJi86maDvAimvtclTsANoao3tFO087evmlDMVa6mRvROqr40r69OOdT2v6mYsxCmbYQ-6n4nhSq_TjZYEC4VxBXy4B-T0e4Yy6TEUC8NgIqS5aMpUR4Xs-bbX-3-kmzTnWFdVVT1huOspf1StTR0gRJ9qX7uF6hNBJadUYFJVx_9R1eNgDPUTwYca3yuguwKbUykZ_MOMBOut9_TOe7p6T995Ty-16N3T7TyU_DUbuwV7ptOS</recordid><startdate>20200330</startdate><enddate>20200330</enddate><creator>Straßner, Cornelia</creator><creator>Mahler, Cornelia</creator><creator>Strauß, Beate</creator><creator>Wehrmann, Ulrich</creator><creator>Krug, Katja</creator><creator>Szecsenyi, Joachim</creator><creator>Haefeli, Walter Emil</creator><creator>Seidling, Hanna Marita</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200330</creationdate><title>Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany</title><author>Straßner, Cornelia ; Mahler, Cornelia ; Strauß, Beate ; Wehrmann, Ulrich ; Krug, Katja ; Szecsenyi, Joachim ; Haefeli, Walter Emil ; Seidling, Hanna Marita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Behaviour change</topic><topic>Campaign</topic><topic>Drug administration</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medication beliefs</topic><topic>Medication Errors</topic><topic>Medication list</topic><topic>Medication reconciliation</topic><topic>Nonprescription Drugs</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Over-the-counter drugs</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Straßner, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahler, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauß, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehrmann, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krug, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szecsenyi, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haefeli, Walter Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidling, Hanna Marita</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ : directory of open access journals</collection><jtitle>BMC geriatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Straßner, Cornelia</au><au>Mahler, Cornelia</au><au>Strauß, Beate</au><au>Wehrmann, Ulrich</au><au>Krug, Katja</au><au>Szecsenyi, Joachim</au><au>Haefeli, Walter Emil</au><au>Seidling, Hanna Marita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany</atitle><jtitle>BMC geriatrics</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Geriatr</addtitle><date>2020-03-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>116-116</pages><artnum>116</artnum><issn>1471-2318</issn><eissn>1471-2318</eissn><abstract>Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens' medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for "General Overuse", "General Usefulness" and "General Harm". The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. No statistically significant change in citizens' medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens' general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32228486</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12877-020-01513-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2318
ispartof BMC geriatrics, 2020-03, Vol.20 (1), p.116-116, Article 116
issn 1471-2318
1471-2318
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2cac5825f291478da11cc2a79d6896c5
source PubMed Central; ProQuest Publicly Available Content
subjects Aged
Analysis
Behavior modification
Behaviour change
Campaign
Drug administration
Drug stores
Drug therapy
Drugs
Geriatrics
Germany
Health care industry
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Medication beliefs
Medication Errors
Medication list
Medication reconciliation
Nonprescription Drugs
Older people
Over-the-counter drugs
Patients
Pharmacy
Polypharmacy
Prescription drugs
Professional ethics
Questionnaires
Statistical analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-06T09%3A38%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medication%20beliefs%20and%20use%20of%20medication%20lists%20-%20is%20there%20a%20connection?%20Results%20from%20a%20before-and-after%20study%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=BMC%20geriatrics&rft.au=Stra%C3%9Fner,%20Cornelia&rft.date=2020-03-30&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=116-116&rft.artnum=116&rft.issn=1471-2318&rft.eissn=1471-2318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12877-020-01513-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA627422601%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9dde2d78a683ef846c5e473087d5485343e70e11ca98beece0480a1fa123c4363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391305924&rft_id=info:pmid/32228486&rft_galeid=A627422601&rfr_iscdi=true