Loading…
A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes
Automated detection schemes are nowadays the standard approach for locating coronal holes in extreme-UV images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). However, factors such as the noisy nature of solar imagery, instrumental effects, and others make it challenging to identify coronal holes using t...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series 2024-03, Vol.271 (1), p.6 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9164e43386170236068f4c19bee143dfb6b41a7ada9d4c3cdfcea2be941aa39f3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 6 |
container_title | The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series |
container_volume | 271 |
creator | Reiss, Martin A. Muglach, Karin Mason, Emily Davies, Emma E. Chakraborty, Shibaji Delouille, Veronique Downs, Cooper Garton, Tadhg M. Grajeda, Jeremy A. Hamada, Amr Heinemann, Stephan G. Hofmeister, Stefan Illarionov, Egor Jarolim, Robert Krista, Larisza Lowder, Chris Verwichte, Erwin Arge, Charles N. Boucheron, Laura E. Foullon, Claire Kirk, Michael S. Kosovichev, Alexander Leisner, Andrew Möstl, Christian Turtle, James Veronig, Astrid |
description | Automated detection schemes are nowadays the standard approach for locating coronal holes in extreme-UV images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). However, factors such as the noisy nature of solar imagery, instrumental effects, and others make it challenging to identify coronal holes using these automated schemes. While discrepancies between detection schemes have been noted in the literature, a comprehensive assessment of these discrepancies is still lacking. The contribution of the Coronal Hole Boundary Working Team in the COSPAR ISWAT initiative to close this gap is threefold. First, we present the first community data set for comparing automated coronal hole detection schemes. This data set consists of 29 SDO images, all of which were selected by experienced observers to challenge automated schemes. Second, we use this community data set as input to 14 widely applied automated schemes to study coronal holes and collect their detection results. Third, we study three SDO images from the data set that exemplify the most important lessons learned from this effort. Our findings show that the choice of the automated detection scheme can have a significant effect on the physical properties of coronal holes, and we discuss the implications of these findings for open questions in solar and heliospheric physics. We envision that this community data set will serve the scientific community as a benchmark data set for future developments in the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3847/1538-4365/ad1408 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2cb55591754344b8b5e044737b4a0026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2cb55591754344b8b5e044737b4a0026</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2926187367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9164e43386170236068f4c19bee143dfb6b41a7ada9d4c3cdfcea2be941aa39f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwM0aCkVA7dux4rFqgFZUYCrN1cS4lVVMHxx3670kIggWmk56-e6f7CLlm9J5nQk1YyrNYcJlOoGCCZidk9INOyYhSqWJKhT4nF227pZSqlOsReZ5GM1fXh30VjtEcAkRrDFHpfI8b8NV-E00PwdUQsOiYd3vYRQu3w2iOAW2o3D5a23essb0kZyXsWrz6nmPy9vjwOlvEq5en5Wy6ii3XWYg1kwIF55lkiiZcUpmVwjKdIzLBizKXuWCgoABdCMttUVqEJEfdUeC65GOyHLyFg61pfFWDPxoHlfkCzm8M-FDZHZrE5mmaaqZSwYXIszxFKoTiKhdAaSI7183garz7OGAbzNYdfPdjaxKdSJYpLlWXokPKete2Hsufq4yavn7Td236rs1Qf7dyO6xUrvl1QrPtxIoZZqRpiv6Xuz9i_1o_AS_0kEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926187367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Reiss, Martin A. ; Muglach, Karin ; Mason, Emily ; Davies, Emma E. ; Chakraborty, Shibaji ; Delouille, Veronique ; Downs, Cooper ; Garton, Tadhg M. ; Grajeda, Jeremy A. ; Hamada, Amr ; Heinemann, Stephan G. ; Hofmeister, Stefan ; Illarionov, Egor ; Jarolim, Robert ; Krista, Larisza ; Lowder, Chris ; Verwichte, Erwin ; Arge, Charles N. ; Boucheron, Laura E. ; Foullon, Claire ; Kirk, Michael S. ; Kosovichev, Alexander ; Leisner, Andrew ; Möstl, Christian ; Turtle, James ; Veronig, Astrid</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Martin A. ; Muglach, Karin ; Mason, Emily ; Davies, Emma E. ; Chakraborty, Shibaji ; Delouille, Veronique ; Downs, Cooper ; Garton, Tadhg M. ; Grajeda, Jeremy A. ; Hamada, Amr ; Heinemann, Stephan G. ; Hofmeister, Stefan ; Illarionov, Egor ; Jarolim, Robert ; Krista, Larisza ; Lowder, Chris ; Verwichte, Erwin ; Arge, Charles N. ; Boucheron, Laura E. ; Foullon, Claire ; Kirk, Michael S. ; Kosovichev, Alexander ; Leisner, Andrew ; Möstl, Christian ; Turtle, James ; Veronig, Astrid</creatorcontrib><description>Automated detection schemes are nowadays the standard approach for locating coronal holes in extreme-UV images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). However, factors such as the noisy nature of solar imagery, instrumental effects, and others make it challenging to identify coronal holes using these automated schemes. While discrepancies between detection schemes have been noted in the literature, a comprehensive assessment of these discrepancies is still lacking. The contribution of the Coronal Hole Boundary Working Team in the COSPAR ISWAT initiative to close this gap is threefold. First, we present the first community data set for comparing automated coronal hole detection schemes. This data set consists of 29 SDO images, all of which were selected by experienced observers to challenge automated schemes. Second, we use this community data set as input to 14 widely applied automated schemes to study coronal holes and collect their detection results. Third, we study three SDO images from the data set that exemplify the most important lessons learned from this effort. Our findings show that the choice of the automated detection scheme can have a significant effect on the physical properties of coronal holes, and we discuss the implications of these findings for open questions in solar and heliospheric physics. We envision that this community data set will serve the scientific community as a benchmark data set for future developments in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0067-0049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad1408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Saskatoon: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Automation ; Coronal hole boundaries ; Coronal holes ; Datasets ; Physical properties ; Solar activity ; Solar corona ; Solar coronal holes ; Solar imagery ; Solar observatories ; Solar wind</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series, 2024-03, Vol.271 (1), p.6</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9164e43386170236068f4c19bee143dfb6b41a7ada9d4c3cdfcea2be941aa39f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4752-7534 ; 0000-0002-3031-2991 ; 0000-0001-7662-1960 ; 0000-0002-8767-7182 ; 0000-0002-2532-9684 ; 0000-0002-1723-1468 ; 0009-0008-3189-8200 ; 0000-0002-6362-5054 ; 0000-0001-9874-1429 ; 0000-0001-9992-8471 ; 0000-0002-9309-2981 ; 0000-0002-5547-9683 ; 0000-0003-2073-002X ; 0000-0001-9326-3448 ; 0000-0002-2655-2108 ; 0000-0001-6868-4152 ; 0000-0003-0735-7769 ; 0000-0003-1759-4354 ; 0000-0001-6792-0037 ; 0000-0002-8187-1566 ; 0000-0002-2858-9625 ; 0000-0003-0364-4883 ; 0000-0003-4627-8967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muglach, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Emma E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Shibaji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delouille, Veronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, Cooper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garton, Tadhg M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grajeda, Jeremy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinemann, Stephan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeister, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illarionov, Egor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarolim, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krista, Larisza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowder, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verwichte, Erwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arge, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucheron, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foullon, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosovichev, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leisner, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möstl, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turtle, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronig, Astrid</creatorcontrib><title>A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes</title><title>The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series</title><addtitle>APJS</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Suppl</addtitle><description>Automated detection schemes are nowadays the standard approach for locating coronal holes in extreme-UV images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). However, factors such as the noisy nature of solar imagery, instrumental effects, and others make it challenging to identify coronal holes using these automated schemes. While discrepancies between detection schemes have been noted in the literature, a comprehensive assessment of these discrepancies is still lacking. The contribution of the Coronal Hole Boundary Working Team in the COSPAR ISWAT initiative to close this gap is threefold. First, we present the first community data set for comparing automated coronal hole detection schemes. This data set consists of 29 SDO images, all of which were selected by experienced observers to challenge automated schemes. Second, we use this community data set as input to 14 widely applied automated schemes to study coronal holes and collect their detection results. Third, we study three SDO images from the data set that exemplify the most important lessons learned from this effort. Our findings show that the choice of the automated detection scheme can have a significant effect on the physical properties of coronal holes, and we discuss the implications of these findings for open questions in solar and heliospheric physics. We envision that this community data set will serve the scientific community as a benchmark data set for future developments in the field.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Coronal hole boundaries</subject><subject>Coronal holes</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Solar activity</subject><subject>Solar corona</subject><subject>Solar coronal holes</subject><subject>Solar imagery</subject><subject>Solar observatories</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><issn>0067-0049</issn><issn>1538-4365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwM0aCkVA7dux4rFqgFZUYCrN1cS4lVVMHxx3670kIggWmk56-e6f7CLlm9J5nQk1YyrNYcJlOoGCCZidk9INOyYhSqWJKhT4nF227pZSqlOsReZ5GM1fXh30VjtEcAkRrDFHpfI8b8NV-E00PwdUQsOiYd3vYRQu3w2iOAW2o3D5a23essb0kZyXsWrz6nmPy9vjwOlvEq5en5Wy6ii3XWYg1kwIF55lkiiZcUpmVwjKdIzLBizKXuWCgoABdCMttUVqEJEfdUeC65GOyHLyFg61pfFWDPxoHlfkCzm8M-FDZHZrE5mmaaqZSwYXIszxFKoTiKhdAaSI7183garz7OGAbzNYdfPdjaxKdSJYpLlWXokPKete2Hsufq4yavn7Td236rs1Qf7dyO6xUrvl1QrPtxIoZZqRpiv6Xuz9i_1o_AS_0kEM</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Reiss, Martin A.</creator><creator>Muglach, Karin</creator><creator>Mason, Emily</creator><creator>Davies, Emma E.</creator><creator>Chakraborty, Shibaji</creator><creator>Delouille, Veronique</creator><creator>Downs, Cooper</creator><creator>Garton, Tadhg M.</creator><creator>Grajeda, Jeremy A.</creator><creator>Hamada, Amr</creator><creator>Heinemann, Stephan G.</creator><creator>Hofmeister, Stefan</creator><creator>Illarionov, Egor</creator><creator>Jarolim, Robert</creator><creator>Krista, Larisza</creator><creator>Lowder, Chris</creator><creator>Verwichte, Erwin</creator><creator>Arge, Charles N.</creator><creator>Boucheron, Laura E.</creator><creator>Foullon, Claire</creator><creator>Kirk, Michael S.</creator><creator>Kosovichev, Alexander</creator><creator>Leisner, Andrew</creator><creator>Möstl, Christian</creator><creator>Turtle, James</creator><creator>Veronig, Astrid</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-7534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-2991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7662-1960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-7182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-9684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-1468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3189-8200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-5054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-1429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-8471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9309-2981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5547-9683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-002X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9326-3448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-4152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-7769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-4354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6792-0037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-1566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-9625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0364-4883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-8967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes</title><author>Reiss, Martin A. ; Muglach, Karin ; Mason, Emily ; Davies, Emma E. ; Chakraborty, Shibaji ; Delouille, Veronique ; Downs, Cooper ; Garton, Tadhg M. ; Grajeda, Jeremy A. ; Hamada, Amr ; Heinemann, Stephan G. ; Hofmeister, Stefan ; Illarionov, Egor ; Jarolim, Robert ; Krista, Larisza ; Lowder, Chris ; Verwichte, Erwin ; Arge, Charles N. ; Boucheron, Laura E. ; Foullon, Claire ; Kirk, Michael S. ; Kosovichev, Alexander ; Leisner, Andrew ; Möstl, Christian ; Turtle, James ; Veronig, Astrid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9164e43386170236068f4c19bee143dfb6b41a7ada9d4c3cdfcea2be941aa39f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Coronal hole boundaries</topic><topic>Coronal holes</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Solar activity</topic><topic>Solar corona</topic><topic>Solar coronal holes</topic><topic>Solar imagery</topic><topic>Solar observatories</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muglach, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Emma E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Shibaji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delouille, Veronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, Cooper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garton, Tadhg M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grajeda, Jeremy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinemann, Stephan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeister, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illarionov, Egor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarolim, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krista, Larisza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowder, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verwichte, Erwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arge, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucheron, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foullon, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosovichev, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leisner, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möstl, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turtle, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronig, Astrid</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiss, Martin A.</au><au>Muglach, Karin</au><au>Mason, Emily</au><au>Davies, Emma E.</au><au>Chakraborty, Shibaji</au><au>Delouille, Veronique</au><au>Downs, Cooper</au><au>Garton, Tadhg M.</au><au>Grajeda, Jeremy A.</au><au>Hamada, Amr</au><au>Heinemann, Stephan G.</au><au>Hofmeister, Stefan</au><au>Illarionov, Egor</au><au>Jarolim, Robert</au><au>Krista, Larisza</au><au>Lowder, Chris</au><au>Verwichte, Erwin</au><au>Arge, Charles N.</au><au>Boucheron, Laura E.</au><au>Foullon, Claire</au><au>Kirk, Michael S.</au><au>Kosovichev, Alexander</au><au>Leisner, Andrew</au><au>Möstl, Christian</au><au>Turtle, James</au><au>Veronig, Astrid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series</jtitle><stitle>APJS</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Suppl</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>271</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><pages>6-</pages><issn>0067-0049</issn><eissn>1538-4365</eissn><abstract>Automated detection schemes are nowadays the standard approach for locating coronal holes in extreme-UV images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). However, factors such as the noisy nature of solar imagery, instrumental effects, and others make it challenging to identify coronal holes using these automated schemes. While discrepancies between detection schemes have been noted in the literature, a comprehensive assessment of these discrepancies is still lacking. The contribution of the Coronal Hole Boundary Working Team in the COSPAR ISWAT initiative to close this gap is threefold. First, we present the first community data set for comparing automated coronal hole detection schemes. This data set consists of 29 SDO images, all of which were selected by experienced observers to challenge automated schemes. Second, we use this community data set as input to 14 widely applied automated schemes to study coronal holes and collect their detection results. Third, we study three SDO images from the data set that exemplify the most important lessons learned from this effort. Our findings show that the choice of the automated detection scheme can have a significant effect on the physical properties of coronal holes, and we discuss the implications of these findings for open questions in solar and heliospheric physics. We envision that this community data set will serve the scientific community as a benchmark data set for future developments in the field.</abstract><cop>Saskatoon</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/1538-4365/ad1408</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-7534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-2991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7662-1960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-7182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-9684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-1468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3189-8200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-5054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-1429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-8471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9309-2981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5547-9683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-002X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9326-3448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-4152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-7769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-4354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6792-0037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-1566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-9625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0364-4883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-8967</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0067-0049 |
ispartof | The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series, 2024-03, Vol.271 (1), p.6 |
issn | 0067-0049 1538-4365 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2cb55591754344b8b5e044737b4a0026 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Automation Coronal hole boundaries Coronal holes Datasets Physical properties Solar activity Solar corona Solar coronal holes Solar imagery Solar observatories Solar wind |
title | A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A40%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Community%20Data%20Set%20for%20Comparing%20Automated%20Coronal%20Hole%20Detection%20Schemes&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal.%20Supplement%20series&rft.au=Reiss,%20Martin%20A.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=271&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.pages=6-&rft.issn=0067-0049&rft.eissn=1538-4365&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/1538-4365/ad1408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2926187367%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9164e43386170236068f4c19bee143dfb6b41a7ada9d4c3cdfcea2be941aa39f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926187367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |