Loading…

Controlled-release oxycodone and naloxone in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a placebo-controlled, randomized study

For Canadian regulatory purposes, an analgesic study was required to complement previously completed, pivotal studies on bowel effects and analgesia associated with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone⁄CR naloxone. To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone versus placebo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pain research & management 2013-03, Vol.18 (2), p.75-82
Main Authors: Cloutier, C, Taliano, John, O'Mahony, W, Csanadi, M, Cohen, G, Sutton, I, Sinclair, D, Awde, M, Henein, S, Robinson, L, Eisenhoffer, J, Piraino, P S, Harsanyi, Z, Michalko, K J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-11d8c5aa814e889a34526cc64fb05048abad0475d3a6fffe7c0b4f43f651d1703
cites
container_end_page 82
container_issue 2
container_start_page 75
container_title Pain research & management
container_volume 18
creator Cloutier, C
Taliano, John
O'Mahony, W
Csanadi, M
Cohen, G
Sutton, I
Sinclair, D
Awde, M
Henein, S
Robinson, L
Eisenhoffer, J
Piraino, P S
Harsanyi, Z
Michalko, K J
description For Canadian regulatory purposes, an analgesic study was required to complement previously completed, pivotal studies on bowel effects and analgesia associated with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone⁄CR naloxone. To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients requiring opioid therapy underwent a two- to seven-day opioid washout before being randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg⁄5 mg CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone or placebo every 12 h, titrated weekly according to efficacy and tolerability to 20 mg⁄10 mg, 30 mg⁄15 mg or 40 mg⁄20 mg every 12 h. After four weeks, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment for an additional four weeks. Acetaminophen⁄codeine (300 mg⁄30 mg every 4 h to 6 h as needed) was provided as rescue medication. Of the 83 randomized patients, 54 (65%) comprised the per-protocol population. According to per-protocol analysis, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone resulted in significantly lower mean (± SD)pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (48.6 ± 23.1 mm versus 55.9 ± 25.4 mm; P=0.0296) and five-point ordinal pain intensity scores (2.1 ± 0.8 versus 2.4 ± 0.9; P=0.0415) compared with placebo. After the double-blinded phase, patients and investigators both preferred CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone over placebo. These outcomes continued in the 79% of patients who chose to continue receiving CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone in a six-month, open-label evaluation. In patients complying with treatment as per protocol, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone was effective for the management of chronic low back pain of moderate or severe intensity.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2013/164609
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2cbdd8a354f6427bb8a9b6620f88f6e9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2cbdd8a354f6427bb8a9b6620f88f6e9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3005926331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-11d8c5aa814e889a34526cc64fb05048abad0475d3a6fffe7c0b4f43f651d1703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkktv1DAURiMEoqWwYo8ssUGCUL_jdIGERjwqVWIDa-vGj04Gxx7sBDrw5_EwZURZ-XV0dH3v1zRPCX5NiBDnFBN2TiSXuL_XnJKeqJYIyu7XPcWslZ0UJ82jUjYYc6Iwe9icUCYlpao_bX6tUpxzCsHZNrvgoDiUbnYm2RQdgmhRhJBu9ocxonnt0JwdzJOLM0oemXVOcTQopB9oAPMVbWGMFwjQNoBxQ2rNUf8K5apL0_jTWVTmxe4eNw88hOKe3K5nzZf37z6vPrZXnz5crt5etUZgPLeEWGUEgCLcKdUD44JKYyT3AxaYKxjAYt4Jy0B6711n8MA9Z14KYkmH2VlzefDaBBu9zeMEeacTjPrPRcrXGvI8muA0NYO1CpjgXnLaDYOCfqi9wl4pL11fXW8Oru0yTM6a2ocM4Y707ksc1_o6fdesq70Xsgpe3Apy-ra4MutpLMaFANGlpWjCBK5TJZRX9Pl_6CYtuc5jT3X1Z7QnrFIvD5TJqZTs_LEYgvU-IHofEH0ISKWf_Vv_kf2bCPYb0EK3Pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1371702913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controlled-release oxycodone and naloxone in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a placebo-controlled, randomized study</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cloutier, C ; Taliano, John ; O'Mahony, W ; Csanadi, M ; Cohen, G ; Sutton, I ; Sinclair, D ; Awde, M ; Henein, S ; Robinson, L ; Eisenhoffer, J ; Piraino, P S ; Harsanyi, Z ; Michalko, K J</creator><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, C ; Taliano, John ; O'Mahony, W ; Csanadi, M ; Cohen, G ; Sutton, I ; Sinclair, D ; Awde, M ; Henein, S ; Robinson, L ; Eisenhoffer, J ; Piraino, P S ; Harsanyi, Z ; Michalko, K J</creatorcontrib><description>For Canadian regulatory purposes, an analgesic study was required to complement previously completed, pivotal studies on bowel effects and analgesia associated with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone⁄CR naloxone. To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients requiring opioid therapy underwent a two- to seven-day opioid washout before being randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg⁄5 mg CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone or placebo every 12 h, titrated weekly according to efficacy and tolerability to 20 mg⁄10 mg, 30 mg⁄15 mg or 40 mg⁄20 mg every 12 h. After four weeks, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment for an additional four weeks. Acetaminophen⁄codeine (300 mg⁄30 mg every 4 h to 6 h as needed) was provided as rescue medication. Of the 83 randomized patients, 54 (65%) comprised the per-protocol population. According to per-protocol analysis, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone resulted in significantly lower mean (± SD)pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (48.6 ± 23.1 mm versus 55.9 ± 25.4 mm; P=0.0296) and five-point ordinal pain intensity scores (2.1 ± 0.8 versus 2.4 ± 0.9; P=0.0415) compared with placebo. After the double-blinded phase, patients and investigators both preferred CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone over placebo. These outcomes continued in the 79% of patients who chose to continue receiving CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone in a six-month, open-label evaluation. In patients complying with treatment as per protocol, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone was effective for the management of chronic low back pain of moderate or severe intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1203-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2013/164609</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23662289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Disability Evaluation ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Naloxone - therapeutic use ; Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Original ; Oxycodone - therapeutic use ; Pain Measurement ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Pain research &amp; management, 2013-03, Vol.18 (2), p.75-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright Pulsus Group Inc. Mar/Apr 2013</rights><rights>2013, Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-11d8c5aa814e889a34526cc64fb05048abad0475d3a6fffe7c0b4f43f651d1703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1371702913/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1371702913?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taliano, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Mahony, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csanadi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awde, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenhoffer, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piraino, P S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harsanyi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalko, K J</creatorcontrib><title>Controlled-release oxycodone and naloxone in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a placebo-controlled, randomized study</title><title>Pain research &amp; management</title><addtitle>Pain Res Manag</addtitle><description>For Canadian regulatory purposes, an analgesic study was required to complement previously completed, pivotal studies on bowel effects and analgesia associated with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone⁄CR naloxone. To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients requiring opioid therapy underwent a two- to seven-day opioid washout before being randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg⁄5 mg CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone or placebo every 12 h, titrated weekly according to efficacy and tolerability to 20 mg⁄10 mg, 30 mg⁄15 mg or 40 mg⁄20 mg every 12 h. After four weeks, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment for an additional four weeks. Acetaminophen⁄codeine (300 mg⁄30 mg every 4 h to 6 h as needed) was provided as rescue medication. Of the 83 randomized patients, 54 (65%) comprised the per-protocol population. According to per-protocol analysis, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone resulted in significantly lower mean (± SD)pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (48.6 ± 23.1 mm versus 55.9 ± 25.4 mm; P=0.0296) and five-point ordinal pain intensity scores (2.1 ± 0.8 versus 2.4 ± 0.9; P=0.0415) compared with placebo. After the double-blinded phase, patients and investigators both preferred CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone over placebo. These outcomes continued in the 79% of patients who chose to continue receiving CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone in a six-month, open-label evaluation. In patients complying with treatment as per protocol, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone was effective for the management of chronic low back pain of moderate or severe intensity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Naloxone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Oxycodone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1203-6765</issn><issn>1918-1523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkktv1DAURiMEoqWwYo8ssUGCUL_jdIGERjwqVWIDa-vGj04Gxx7sBDrw5_EwZURZ-XV0dH3v1zRPCX5NiBDnFBN2TiSXuL_XnJKeqJYIyu7XPcWslZ0UJ82jUjYYc6Iwe9icUCYlpao_bX6tUpxzCsHZNrvgoDiUbnYm2RQdgmhRhJBu9ocxonnt0JwdzJOLM0oemXVOcTQopB9oAPMVbWGMFwjQNoBxQ2rNUf8K5apL0_jTWVTmxe4eNw88hOKe3K5nzZf37z6vPrZXnz5crt5etUZgPLeEWGUEgCLcKdUD44JKYyT3AxaYKxjAYt4Jy0B6711n8MA9Z14KYkmH2VlzefDaBBu9zeMEeacTjPrPRcrXGvI8muA0NYO1CpjgXnLaDYOCfqi9wl4pL11fXW8Oru0yTM6a2ocM4Y707ksc1_o6fdesq70Xsgpe3Apy-ra4MutpLMaFANGlpWjCBK5TJZRX9Pl_6CYtuc5jT3X1Z7QnrFIvD5TJqZTs_LEYgvU-IHofEH0ISKWf_Vv_kf2bCPYb0EK3Pg</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Cloutier, C</creator><creator>Taliano, John</creator><creator>O'Mahony, W</creator><creator>Csanadi, M</creator><creator>Cohen, G</creator><creator>Sutton, I</creator><creator>Sinclair, D</creator><creator>Awde, M</creator><creator>Henein, S</creator><creator>Robinson, L</creator><creator>Eisenhoffer, J</creator><creator>Piraino, P S</creator><creator>Harsanyi, Z</creator><creator>Michalko, K J</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>Pulsus Group Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Controlled-release oxycodone and naloxone in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a placebo-controlled, randomized study</title><author>Cloutier, C ; Taliano, John ; O'Mahony, W ; Csanadi, M ; Cohen, G ; Sutton, I ; Sinclair, D ; Awde, M ; Henein, S ; Robinson, L ; Eisenhoffer, J ; Piraino, P S ; Harsanyi, Z ; Michalko, K J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-11d8c5aa814e889a34526cc64fb05048abad0475d3a6fffe7c0b4f43f651d1703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Naloxone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Oxycodone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cloutier, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taliano, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Mahony, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csanadi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awde, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenhoffer, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piraino, P S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harsanyi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalko, K J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Pain research &amp; management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cloutier, C</au><au>Taliano, John</au><au>O'Mahony, W</au><au>Csanadi, M</au><au>Cohen, G</au><au>Sutton, I</au><au>Sinclair, D</au><au>Awde, M</au><au>Henein, S</au><au>Robinson, L</au><au>Eisenhoffer, J</au><au>Piraino, P S</au><au>Harsanyi, Z</au><au>Michalko, K J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controlled-release oxycodone and naloxone in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a placebo-controlled, randomized study</atitle><jtitle>Pain research &amp; management</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Res Manag</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>75-82</pages><issn>1203-6765</issn><eissn>1918-1523</eissn><abstract>For Canadian regulatory purposes, an analgesic study was required to complement previously completed, pivotal studies on bowel effects and analgesia associated with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone⁄CR naloxone. To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients requiring opioid therapy underwent a two- to seven-day opioid washout before being randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg⁄5 mg CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone or placebo every 12 h, titrated weekly according to efficacy and tolerability to 20 mg⁄10 mg, 30 mg⁄15 mg or 40 mg⁄20 mg every 12 h. After four weeks, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment for an additional four weeks. Acetaminophen⁄codeine (300 mg⁄30 mg every 4 h to 6 h as needed) was provided as rescue medication. Of the 83 randomized patients, 54 (65%) comprised the per-protocol population. According to per-protocol analysis, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone resulted in significantly lower mean (± SD)pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (48.6 ± 23.1 mm versus 55.9 ± 25.4 mm; P=0.0296) and five-point ordinal pain intensity scores (2.1 ± 0.8 versus 2.4 ± 0.9; P=0.0415) compared with placebo. After the double-blinded phase, patients and investigators both preferred CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone over placebo. These outcomes continued in the 79% of patients who chose to continue receiving CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone in a six-month, open-label evaluation. In patients complying with treatment as per protocol, CR oxycodone⁄CR naloxone was effective for the management of chronic low back pain of moderate or severe intensity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>23662289</pmid><doi>10.1155/2013/164609</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1203-6765
ispartof Pain research & management, 2013-03, Vol.18 (2), p.75-82
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2cbdd8a354f6427bb8a9b6620f88f6e9
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); IngentaConnect Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Disability Evaluation
Double-Blind Method
Drug Delivery Systems
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain - drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Naloxone - therapeutic use
Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use
Original
Oxycodone - therapeutic use
Pain Measurement
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Controlled-release oxycodone and naloxone in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a placebo-controlled, randomized study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A25%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controlled-release%20oxycodone%20and%20naloxone%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain:%20a%20placebo-controlled,%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=Pain%20research%20&%20management&rft.au=Cloutier,%20C&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=75-82&rft.issn=1203-6765&rft.eissn=1918-1523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2013/164609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3005926331%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-11d8c5aa814e889a34526cc64fb05048abad0475d3a6fffe7c0b4f43f651d1703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1371702913&rft_id=info:pmid/23662289&rfr_iscdi=true