Loading…
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer
Measuring the outcomes of palliative care plays an important role to improve the quality, efficiency, and availability of these services in patients with cancer. Using valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tools has a considerable role to measure these outcomes. This study aimed to assess the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2022-04, Vol.13, p.858684-858684 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273 |
container_end_page | 858684 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 858684 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Sirati Nir, Masoud Rassouli, Maryam Ebadi, Abbas Moosavi, Soolmaz Pakseresht, Maryam Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh Souri, Hossein Nasiri, Morteza Karami, Maryam Fereidouni, Armin Barasteh, Salman |
description | Measuring the outcomes of palliative care plays an important role to improve the quality, efficiency, and availability of these services in patients with cancer. Using valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tools has a considerable role to measure these outcomes. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the translated version of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS).
This methodological study was conducted in two outpatient clinics related to Shohada Tajrish and Baqiyatallah hospitals in Tehran in 2019-2020. The translation was done using the Forward-Backward approach after gaining permission from the developer. Face validity was tested with 10 patients with cancer through cognitive interviewing, as well as content validity with four experts. Construct validity was performed by (
= 203) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation (
= 150). To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, interpretability and ceiling and floor effects were assessed.
A total of 353 patients with cancer under palliative care were included in the study. Then, three psychological (30%), physical (12.25%), and social factors (12.08%) with a cumulative variance of 54.34% were extracted in exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model has a good fit of information. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for scale was 0.719. Furthermore, the ICC was 0.812. The scale was interpretable, and ceiling and floor effects were 0%.
Persian version of the POS was evaluated as a valid and reliable tool. Therefore, it can be used by the clinician to monitor the consequences of palliative care in Iranian cancer patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858684 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ce0cd495aaf48979b9c54dd82fc1a62</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2ce0cd495aaf48979b9c54dd82fc1a62</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2668219847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaUKaH9BL0TE97EZf1selEJa0DQTWkH4cxViWdxW81layA_vvK2eTkMxlhtE7j2Z4EfpMyZJzbS67fT5slowwttSVllq8Q6dUSrGgROn3r-oTdJ7zPSkhCCOEfUQnvJKESVOdolzng9vGnR9TcLhOce_TGHzGscPj1uPapxxgwH_mHIe5XUPfBxjDg8crSB6vp9EVAL5z0Ht8Ua_vvuIw4Kt26sciLrRhzPhvGLdFPzifPqEPHfTZnz_lM_T7-_Wv1c_F7frHzerqduE4JWKhuWSd4EoyKhvdUGNUp6RUpqq49G3jwEjhuFAAVSWh6JQSDAxhHfGUKX6Gbo7cNsK93aewg3SwEYJ9bMS0sVCOdb23zHniWmEqgE5oo0xjXCXaVrPOUZCssL4dWfup2fnWlZsS9G-gb1-GsLWb-GANZYyIGXDxBEjx3-TzaHchO9_3MPg4Zcuk1IwaLea96VHqUsw5-e7lG0rs7L199N7O3tuj92Xmy-v9Xiaeneb_ATpkqvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2668219847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Sirati Nir, Masoud ; Rassouli, Maryam ; Ebadi, Abbas ; Moosavi, Soolmaz ; Pakseresht, Maryam ; Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh ; Souri, Hossein ; Nasiri, Morteza ; Karami, Maryam ; Fereidouni, Armin ; Barasteh, Salman</creator><creatorcontrib>Sirati Nir, Masoud ; Rassouli, Maryam ; Ebadi, Abbas ; Moosavi, Soolmaz ; Pakseresht, Maryam ; Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh ; Souri, Hossein ; Nasiri, Morteza ; Karami, Maryam ; Fereidouni, Armin ; Barasteh, Salman</creatorcontrib><description>Measuring the outcomes of palliative care plays an important role to improve the quality, efficiency, and availability of these services in patients with cancer. Using valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tools has a considerable role to measure these outcomes. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the translated version of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS).
This methodological study was conducted in two outpatient clinics related to Shohada Tajrish and Baqiyatallah hospitals in Tehran in 2019-2020. The translation was done using the Forward-Backward approach after gaining permission from the developer. Face validity was tested with 10 patients with cancer through cognitive interviewing, as well as content validity with four experts. Construct validity was performed by (
= 203) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation (
= 150). To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, interpretability and ceiling and floor effects were assessed.
A total of 353 patients with cancer under palliative care were included in the study. Then, three psychological (30%), physical (12.25%), and social factors (12.08%) with a cumulative variance of 54.34% were extracted in exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model has a good fit of information. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for scale was 0.719. Furthermore, the ICC was 0.812. The scale was interpretable, and ceiling and floor effects were 0%.
Persian version of the POS was evaluated as a valid and reliable tool. Therefore, it can be used by the clinician to monitor the consequences of palliative care in Iranian cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858684</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35602695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>measurement ; palliative care ; Psychology ; psychometrics ; reliability ; scale ; validity</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2022-04, Vol.13, p.858684-858684</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Sirati Nir, Rassouli, Ebadi, Moosavi, Pakseresht, Hasan Shiri, Souri, Nasiri, Karami, Fereidouni and Barasteh.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Sirati Nir, Rassouli, Ebadi, Moosavi, Pakseresht, Hasan Shiri, Souri, Nasiri, Karami, Fereidouni and Barasteh. 2022 Sirati Nir, Rassouli, Ebadi, Moosavi, Pakseresht, Hasan Shiri, Souri, Nasiri, Karami, Fereidouni and Barasteh</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122042/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122042/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sirati Nir, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassouli, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosavi, Soolmaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakseresht, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souri, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiri, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karami, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fereidouni, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barasteh, Salman</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Measuring the outcomes of palliative care plays an important role to improve the quality, efficiency, and availability of these services in patients with cancer. Using valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tools has a considerable role to measure these outcomes. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the translated version of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS).
This methodological study was conducted in two outpatient clinics related to Shohada Tajrish and Baqiyatallah hospitals in Tehran in 2019-2020. The translation was done using the Forward-Backward approach after gaining permission from the developer. Face validity was tested with 10 patients with cancer through cognitive interviewing, as well as content validity with four experts. Construct validity was performed by (
= 203) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation (
= 150). To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, interpretability and ceiling and floor effects were assessed.
A total of 353 patients with cancer under palliative care were included in the study. Then, three psychological (30%), physical (12.25%), and social factors (12.08%) with a cumulative variance of 54.34% were extracted in exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model has a good fit of information. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for scale was 0.719. Furthermore, the ICC was 0.812. The scale was interpretable, and ceiling and floor effects were 0%.
Persian version of the POS was evaluated as a valid and reliable tool. Therefore, it can be used by the clinician to monitor the consequences of palliative care in Iranian cancer patients.</description><subject>measurement</subject><subject>palliative care</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>scale</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaUKaH9BL0TE97EZf1selEJa0DQTWkH4cxViWdxW81layA_vvK2eTkMxlhtE7j2Z4EfpMyZJzbS67fT5slowwttSVllq8Q6dUSrGgROn3r-oTdJ7zPSkhCCOEfUQnvJKESVOdolzng9vGnR9TcLhOce_TGHzGscPj1uPapxxgwH_mHIe5XUPfBxjDg8crSB6vp9EVAL5z0Ht8Ua_vvuIw4Kt26sciLrRhzPhvGLdFPzifPqEPHfTZnz_lM_T7-_Wv1c_F7frHzerqduE4JWKhuWSd4EoyKhvdUGNUp6RUpqq49G3jwEjhuFAAVSWh6JQSDAxhHfGUKX6Gbo7cNsK93aewg3SwEYJ9bMS0sVCOdb23zHniWmEqgE5oo0xjXCXaVrPOUZCssL4dWfup2fnWlZsS9G-gb1-GsLWb-GANZYyIGXDxBEjx3-TzaHchO9_3MPg4Zcuk1IwaLea96VHqUsw5-e7lG0rs7L199N7O3tuj92Xmy-v9Xiaeneb_ATpkqvI</recordid><startdate>20220428</startdate><enddate>20220428</enddate><creator>Sirati Nir, Masoud</creator><creator>Rassouli, Maryam</creator><creator>Ebadi, Abbas</creator><creator>Moosavi, Soolmaz</creator><creator>Pakseresht, Maryam</creator><creator>Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Souri, Hossein</creator><creator>Nasiri, Morteza</creator><creator>Karami, Maryam</creator><creator>Fereidouni, Armin</creator><creator>Barasteh, Salman</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220428</creationdate><title>Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer</title><author>Sirati Nir, Masoud ; Rassouli, Maryam ; Ebadi, Abbas ; Moosavi, Soolmaz ; Pakseresht, Maryam ; Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh ; Souri, Hossein ; Nasiri, Morteza ; Karami, Maryam ; Fereidouni, Armin ; Barasteh, Salman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>measurement</topic><topic>palliative care</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>scale</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sirati Nir, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassouli, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosavi, Soolmaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakseresht, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souri, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiri, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karami, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fereidouni, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barasteh, Salman</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sirati Nir, Masoud</au><au>Rassouli, Maryam</au><au>Ebadi, Abbas</au><au>Moosavi, Soolmaz</au><au>Pakseresht, Maryam</au><au>Hasan Shiri, Fatemeh</au><au>Souri, Hossein</au><au>Nasiri, Morteza</au><au>Karami, Maryam</au><au>Fereidouni, Armin</au><au>Barasteh, Salman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-04-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>858684</spage><epage>858684</epage><pages>858684-858684</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Measuring the outcomes of palliative care plays an important role to improve the quality, efficiency, and availability of these services in patients with cancer. Using valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tools has a considerable role to measure these outcomes. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the translated version of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS).
This methodological study was conducted in two outpatient clinics related to Shohada Tajrish and Baqiyatallah hospitals in Tehran in 2019-2020. The translation was done using the Forward-Backward approach after gaining permission from the developer. Face validity was tested with 10 patients with cancer through cognitive interviewing, as well as content validity with four experts. Construct validity was performed by (
= 203) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation (
= 150). To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, interpretability and ceiling and floor effects were assessed.
A total of 353 patients with cancer under palliative care were included in the study. Then, three psychological (30%), physical (12.25%), and social factors (12.08%) with a cumulative variance of 54.34% were extracted in exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model has a good fit of information. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for scale was 0.719. Furthermore, the ICC was 0.812. The scale was interpretable, and ceiling and floor effects were 0%.
Persian version of the POS was evaluated as a valid and reliable tool. Therefore, it can be used by the clinician to monitor the consequences of palliative care in Iranian cancer patients.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>35602695</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858684</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2022-04, Vol.13, p.858684-858684 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ce0cd495aaf48979b9c54dd82fc1a62 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | measurement palliative care Psychology psychometrics reliability scale validity |
title | Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A32%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Properties%20of%20the%20Persian%20Version%20of%20Palliative%20Care%20Outcome%20Scale%20(POS)%20in%20Adult%20Patients%20With%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Sirati%20Nir,%20Masoud&rft.date=2022-04-28&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=858684&rft.epage=858684&rft.pages=858684-858684&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2668219847%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-8362f4376216b8b1997f766795536edbca964c347aa556a7627742a902f0e1273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2668219847&rft_id=info:pmid/35602695&rfr_iscdi=true |