Loading…

The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study

Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian heart journal 2020-05, Vol.72 (3), p.184-188
Main Authors: Gokhroo, Rajendra K., Chandra, Kailash, Nandal, Rajesh, Bisht, Devendra S., Gupta, Sajal, Kishor, Kamal, Avinash, A., Pandey, Shashikant, Roy, Ramsagar, Phogat, Ashish, Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad, kaul, Anushri
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3
container_end_page 188
container_issue 3
container_start_page 184
container_title Indian heart journal
container_volume 72
creator Gokhroo, Rajendra K.
Chandra, Kailash
Nandal, Rajesh
Bisht, Devendra S.
Gupta, Sajal
Kishor, Kamal
Avinash, A.
Pandey, Shashikant
Roy, Ramsagar
Phogat, Ashish
Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad
kaul, Anushri
description Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access. To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy. 2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities. 2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure. The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ce688e24f694c5fbc19467c44331694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0019483220301164</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2ce688e24f694c5fbc19467c44331694</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S0019483220301164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1q3DAQhUVpabZpH6B3egFv9WfLbqEQQpsGAr1Jr4U8Gu3KONYi2Uv3mfKSlbMhkJvqRmh0viNmdAj5zNmWM958GbZhP2wFE2zL6i3j7A3ZCMFlJXUj35INY7yrVCvFBfmQ88CYqFXH3pMLKXTTMt5uyOP9HmmYwhzsSPHvAVPACZBGT4Xqago2Y15Pc9Et42QTtWnGdKI2U4feLuNMLQDmTH1MFGKKRXSiLtjdFPMcgNrJlScKdMRpDuV6pIcUAd2SirctPM1h2o1IAVfZV3o10djnAthnfZ4Xd_pI3nk7Zvz0vF-SPz9_3F__qu5-39xeX91VUHM9V1pL2bZSKSbR9Y4JcL6vJQgrQTPtWSsBBGcdNML2QoueQ-O5QtkJyXkvL8nt2ddFO5hDCg-lIRNtME-FmHamzCDAiEYANm2LQvmmU1D7HninGg1KSclLqXh9P3sdlv4B3dpgsuMr09c3U9ibXTwarXhZohjwswGkmHNC_8JyZtYUmMGUFJg1BYbVpqSgMN_ODJYpHQMmk-HpW11ICHNpI_yH_geIwLwh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Gokhroo, Rajendra K. ; Chandra, Kailash ; Nandal, Rajesh ; Bisht, Devendra S. ; Gupta, Sajal ; Kishor, Kamal ; Avinash, A. ; Pandey, Shashikant ; Roy, Ramsagar ; Phogat, Ashish ; Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad ; kaul, Anushri</creator><creatorcontrib>Gokhroo, Rajendra K. ; Chandra, Kailash ; Nandal, Rajesh ; Bisht, Devendra S. ; Gupta, Sajal ; Kishor, Kamal ; Avinash, A. ; Pandey, Shashikant ; Roy, Ramsagar ; Phogat, Ashish ; Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad ; kaul, Anushri</creatorcontrib><description>Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access. To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy. 2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities. 2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure. The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-4832</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-3763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32768018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Coronary procedure ; Original ; Ulnar artery access ; Upper limb access</subject><ispartof>Indian heart journal, 2020-05, Vol.72 (3), p.184-188</ispartof><rights>2020 Cardiological Society of India</rights><rights>2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020 Cardiological Society of India</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2426-8813</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411112/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220301164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Kailash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandal, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisht, Devendra S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sajal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishor, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avinash, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Shashikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ramsagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phogat, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kaul, Anushri</creatorcontrib><title>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</title><title>Indian heart journal</title><description>Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access. To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy. 2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities. 2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure. The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.</description><subject>Coronary procedure</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ulnar artery access</subject><subject>Upper limb access</subject><issn>0019-4832</issn><issn>2213-3763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt1q3DAQhUVpabZpH6B3egFv9WfLbqEQQpsGAr1Jr4U8Gu3KONYi2Uv3mfKSlbMhkJvqRmh0viNmdAj5zNmWM958GbZhP2wFE2zL6i3j7A3ZCMFlJXUj35INY7yrVCvFBfmQ88CYqFXH3pMLKXTTMt5uyOP9HmmYwhzsSPHvAVPACZBGT4Xqago2Y15Pc9Et42QTtWnGdKI2U4feLuNMLQDmTH1MFGKKRXSiLtjdFPMcgNrJlScKdMRpDuV6pIcUAd2SirctPM1h2o1IAVfZV3o10djnAthnfZ4Xd_pI3nk7Zvz0vF-SPz9_3F__qu5-39xeX91VUHM9V1pL2bZSKSbR9Y4JcL6vJQgrQTPtWSsBBGcdNML2QoueQ-O5QtkJyXkvL8nt2ddFO5hDCg-lIRNtME-FmHamzCDAiEYANm2LQvmmU1D7HninGg1KSclLqXh9P3sdlv4B3dpgsuMr09c3U9ibXTwarXhZohjwswGkmHNC_8JyZtYUmMGUFJg1BYbVpqSgMN_ODJYpHQMmk-HpW11ICHNpI_yH_geIwLwh</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</creator><creator>Chandra, Kailash</creator><creator>Nandal, Rajesh</creator><creator>Bisht, Devendra S.</creator><creator>Gupta, Sajal</creator><creator>Kishor, Kamal</creator><creator>Avinash, A.</creator><creator>Pandey, Shashikant</creator><creator>Roy, Ramsagar</creator><creator>Phogat, Ashish</creator><creator>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</creator><creator>kaul, Anushri</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-8813</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</title><author>Gokhroo, Rajendra K. ; Chandra, Kailash ; Nandal, Rajesh ; Bisht, Devendra S. ; Gupta, Sajal ; Kishor, Kamal ; Avinash, A. ; Pandey, Shashikant ; Roy, Ramsagar ; Phogat, Ashish ; Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad ; kaul, Anushri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Coronary procedure</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ulnar artery access</topic><topic>Upper limb access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Kailash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandal, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisht, Devendra S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sajal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishor, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avinash, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Shashikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ramsagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phogat, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kaul, Anushri</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</au><au>Chandra, Kailash</au><au>Nandal, Rajesh</au><au>Bisht, Devendra S.</au><au>Gupta, Sajal</au><au>Kishor, Kamal</au><au>Avinash, A.</au><au>Pandey, Shashikant</au><au>Roy, Ramsagar</au><au>Phogat, Ashish</au><au>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</au><au>kaul, Anushri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</atitle><jtitle>Indian heart journal</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>184-188</pages><issn>0019-4832</issn><eissn>2213-3763</eissn><abstract>Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access. To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy. 2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities. 2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure. The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32768018</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-8813</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-4832
ispartof Indian heart journal, 2020-05, Vol.72 (3), p.184-188
issn 0019-4832
2213-3763
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ce688e24f694c5fbc19467c44331694
source Open Access: PubMed Central; ScienceDirect®
subjects Coronary procedure
Original
Ulnar artery access
Upper limb access
title The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20initial%20experience%20of%202495%20cases%20of%20the%20ulnar%20artery%20as%20default%20access%20for%20coronary%20diagnostic%20and%20interventional%20procedures%20at%20a%20single%20center:%20An%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Indian%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Gokhroo,%20Rajendra%20K.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=184-188&rft.issn=0019-4832&rft.eissn=2213-3763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES0019483220301164%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32768018&rfr_iscdi=true