Loading…
The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study
Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossov...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian heart journal 2020-05, Vol.72 (3), p.184-188 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3 |
container_end_page | 188 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 184 |
container_title | Indian heart journal |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Gokhroo, Rajendra K. Chandra, Kailash Nandal, Rajesh Bisht, Devendra S. Gupta, Sajal Kishor, Kamal Avinash, A. Pandey, Shashikant Roy, Ramsagar Phogat, Ashish Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad kaul, Anushri |
description | Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access.
To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy.
2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities.
2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure.
The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ce688e24f694c5fbc19467c44331694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0019483220301164</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2ce688e24f694c5fbc19467c44331694</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S0019483220301164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1q3DAQhUVpabZpH6B3egFv9WfLbqEQQpsGAr1Jr4U8Gu3KONYi2Uv3mfKSlbMhkJvqRmh0viNmdAj5zNmWM958GbZhP2wFE2zL6i3j7A3ZCMFlJXUj35INY7yrVCvFBfmQ88CYqFXH3pMLKXTTMt5uyOP9HmmYwhzsSPHvAVPACZBGT4Xqago2Y15Pc9Et42QTtWnGdKI2U4feLuNMLQDmTH1MFGKKRXSiLtjdFPMcgNrJlScKdMRpDuV6pIcUAd2SirctPM1h2o1IAVfZV3o10djnAthnfZ4Xd_pI3nk7Zvz0vF-SPz9_3F__qu5-39xeX91VUHM9V1pL2bZSKSbR9Y4JcL6vJQgrQTPtWSsBBGcdNML2QoueQ-O5QtkJyXkvL8nt2ddFO5hDCg-lIRNtME-FmHamzCDAiEYANm2LQvmmU1D7HninGg1KSclLqXh9P3sdlv4B3dpgsuMr09c3U9ibXTwarXhZohjwswGkmHNC_8JyZtYUmMGUFJg1BYbVpqSgMN_ODJYpHQMmk-HpW11ICHNpI_yH_geIwLwh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Gokhroo, Rajendra K. ; Chandra, Kailash ; Nandal, Rajesh ; Bisht, Devendra S. ; Gupta, Sajal ; Kishor, Kamal ; Avinash, A. ; Pandey, Shashikant ; Roy, Ramsagar ; Phogat, Ashish ; Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad ; kaul, Anushri</creator><creatorcontrib>Gokhroo, Rajendra K. ; Chandra, Kailash ; Nandal, Rajesh ; Bisht, Devendra S. ; Gupta, Sajal ; Kishor, Kamal ; Avinash, A. ; Pandey, Shashikant ; Roy, Ramsagar ; Phogat, Ashish ; Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad ; kaul, Anushri</creatorcontrib><description>Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access.
To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy.
2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities.
2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure.
The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-4832</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-3763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32768018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Coronary procedure ; Original ; Ulnar artery access ; Upper limb access</subject><ispartof>Indian heart journal, 2020-05, Vol.72 (3), p.184-188</ispartof><rights>2020 Cardiological Society of India</rights><rights>2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020 Cardiological Society of India</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2426-8813</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411112/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483220301164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Kailash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandal, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisht, Devendra S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sajal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishor, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avinash, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Shashikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ramsagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phogat, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kaul, Anushri</creatorcontrib><title>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</title><title>Indian heart journal</title><description>Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access.
To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy.
2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities.
2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure.
The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.</description><subject>Coronary procedure</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ulnar artery access</subject><subject>Upper limb access</subject><issn>0019-4832</issn><issn>2213-3763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt1q3DAQhUVpabZpH6B3egFv9WfLbqEQQpsGAr1Jr4U8Gu3KONYi2Uv3mfKSlbMhkJvqRmh0viNmdAj5zNmWM958GbZhP2wFE2zL6i3j7A3ZCMFlJXUj35INY7yrVCvFBfmQ88CYqFXH3pMLKXTTMt5uyOP9HmmYwhzsSPHvAVPACZBGT4Xqago2Y15Pc9Et42QTtWnGdKI2U4feLuNMLQDmTH1MFGKKRXSiLtjdFPMcgNrJlScKdMRpDuV6pIcUAd2SirctPM1h2o1IAVfZV3o10djnAthnfZ4Xd_pI3nk7Zvz0vF-SPz9_3F__qu5-39xeX91VUHM9V1pL2bZSKSbR9Y4JcL6vJQgrQTPtWSsBBGcdNML2QoueQ-O5QtkJyXkvL8nt2ddFO5hDCg-lIRNtME-FmHamzCDAiEYANm2LQvmmU1D7HninGg1KSclLqXh9P3sdlv4B3dpgsuMr09c3U9ibXTwarXhZohjwswGkmHNC_8JyZtYUmMGUFJg1BYbVpqSgMN_ODJYpHQMmk-HpW11ICHNpI_yH_geIwLwh</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</creator><creator>Chandra, Kailash</creator><creator>Nandal, Rajesh</creator><creator>Bisht, Devendra S.</creator><creator>Gupta, Sajal</creator><creator>Kishor, Kamal</creator><creator>Avinash, A.</creator><creator>Pandey, Shashikant</creator><creator>Roy, Ramsagar</creator><creator>Phogat, Ashish</creator><creator>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</creator><creator>kaul, Anushri</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-8813</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</title><author>Gokhroo, Rajendra K. ; Chandra, Kailash ; Nandal, Rajesh ; Bisht, Devendra S. ; Gupta, Sajal ; Kishor, Kamal ; Avinash, A. ; Pandey, Shashikant ; Roy, Ramsagar ; Phogat, Ashish ; Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad ; kaul, Anushri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Coronary procedure</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ulnar artery access</topic><topic>Upper limb access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Kailash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandal, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisht, Devendra S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sajal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishor, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avinash, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Shashikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ramsagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phogat, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kaul, Anushri</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gokhroo, Rajendra K.</au><au>Chandra, Kailash</au><au>Nandal, Rajesh</au><au>Bisht, Devendra S.</au><au>Gupta, Sajal</au><au>Kishor, Kamal</au><au>Avinash, A.</au><au>Pandey, Shashikant</au><au>Roy, Ramsagar</au><au>Phogat, Ashish</au><au>Tasleem, Tarik Mohammad</au><au>kaul, Anushri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study</atitle><jtitle>Indian heart journal</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>184-188</pages><issn>0019-4832</issn><eissn>2213-3763</eissn><abstract>Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access.
To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy.
2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities.
2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure.
The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32768018</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-8813</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-4832 |
ispartof | Indian heart journal, 2020-05, Vol.72 (3), p.184-188 |
issn | 0019-4832 2213-3763 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ce688e24f694c5fbc19467c44331694 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; ScienceDirect® |
subjects | Coronary procedure Original Ulnar artery access Upper limb access |
title | The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20initial%20experience%20of%202495%20cases%20of%20the%20ulnar%20artery%20as%20default%20access%20for%20coronary%20diagnostic%20and%20interventional%20procedures%20at%20a%20single%20center:%20An%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Indian%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Gokhroo,%20Rajendra%20K.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=184-188&rft.issn=0019-4832&rft.eissn=2213-3763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.010&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES0019483220301164%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-77338834403edbd02cdfb53c2a3c707f083cc2109c62ab272b1c6f14e392311b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32768018&rfr_iscdi=true |