Predicting and Testing Bioavailability of Magnesium Supplements

• Published in: Nutrients 2019-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1663
• Main Authors: Blancquaert, Laura, Vervaet, Chris, Derave, Wim
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorption; Adolescent; Adult; bioaccessibility; Bioavailability; Biological Availability; Biomedical materials; Cardiovascular disease; Citric acid; Dietary Supplements; Dosage Forms; Drug Liberation; Ecosystems; Female; Homeostasis; Humans; In vitro methods and tests; In vivo methods and tests; Ingestion; Intestine; Magnesium; Magnesium - blood; Magnesium - chemistry; Magnesium - pharmacokinetics; Magnesium - urine; Male; Migraine; Monitoring; Muscle pain; Musculoskeletal system; Nutrition; Physiology; Small intestine; supplements; Tablets; Young Adult
• ISSN: 2072-6643; 2072-6643
• DOI: 10.3390/nu11071663

Despite the presumption of the beneficial effects of magnesium supplementation, little is known about the pharmacokinetics of different magnesium formulations. We aimed to investigate the value of two in vitro approaches to predict bioavailability of magnesium and to validate this in subsequent in vivo testing. In vitro assessment of 15 commercially available magnesium formulations was performed by means of a Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME ) and by dissolution tests. Two magnesium formulations with contrasting bioavailability prediction from both in vitro tests (best vs. worst) were selected for in vivo testing in 30 subjects. In vivo bioavailability was compared following one acute ingestion by monitoring blood magnesium concentrations up to 6 h following intake. The in vitro tests showed a very wide variation in absorption and dissolution of the 15 magnesium products. In the in vivo testing, a significant different serum magnesium absorption profile was found up to 4 h following supplement ingestion for the two supplements with opposing in vitro test results. Moreover, maximal serum magnesium increase and total area under the curve were significantly different for both supplements (+6.2% vs. +4.6% and 6.87 vs. 0.31 mM.min, respectively). Collectively, poor bioaccessibility and bioavailability in the SHIME model clearly translated into poor dissolution and poor bioavailability in vivo. This provides a valid methodology for the prediction of in vivo bioavailability and effectiveness of micronutrients by specific in vitro approaches.