General Practices' Experiences With Patients' Web-Based Access to Medical Records: Survey Study

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research 2023-04, Vol.25 (1), p.e41832-e41832
• Main Authors: Keuper, Jelle, Batenburg, Ronald, van Tuyl, Lilian, Verheij, Robert
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access; Clinical decision making; Computerized medical records; Electronic Health Records; Empowerment; Family physicians; General Practice; Group decision making; Health care; Humans; Internet; Medical personnel; Medical records; Netherlands; Original Paper; Patient safety; Patient satisfaction; Personal health; Polls & surveys; Privacy; Professional ethics; Professionals; Questionnaires; Support services; Surveys and Questionnaires; Web portals; Workloads
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/41832

Patients' web-based access to their medical records is expected to promote their role and responsibility in managing their own health and treatments and supporting shared decision-making. As of July 2020, general practices in the Netherlands are legally obliged to provide their patients access to their electronic medical records. Web-based access provision is facilitated and stimulated through a national support program named OPEN. We aimed to investigate general practice staff experiences with providing web-based access; investigate its impact on patient consultations, administrative actions, and patient inquiries; and investigate how it affects routine general practice workflow processes. In October 2021, a total of 3813 general practices in the Netherlands were invited to complete a web-based survey that included questions regarding their experiences with the provision of web-based access to medical records and how it affects routine general practice workflow. Responses of general practices that started providing web-based access before 2020, in 2020, or in 2021 were analyzed to identify trends. Of 3813 invited general practices, 523 (13.72%) completed the survey. Approximately all responding general practices (487/523, 93.1%) indicated that they provide web-based access. Experiences with patients' web-based access were diverse, with 36.9% (178/482) primarily positive, 8.1% (39/482) primarily negative, 42.3% (204/482) neutral, and 12.7% (61/482) could not (yet) indicate how they experienced web-based access. Of the total, two-thirds (311/473, 65.8%) reported an increase in e-consultations and a similar percentage (302/474, 63.7%) indicated an increase in administrative actions associated with web-based access provision. A small proportion of the practices (≤10%) experienced a decrease in patient contacts. Earlier adoption of web-based access was associated with a more positive attitude toward web-based access and more positive experienced effects related to patient contacts and general practice workflow. The surveyed general practices mainly experienced providing web-based access as either neutral or mostly positive, despite an increased number of patient contacts and administrative burden that were associated with its adoption. Periodic monitoring of experiences is needed to understand the temporal or structural nature of both the intended and unintended effects of patients' web-based access to medical records for general practices and their staff.