Loading…
Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence
The use of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has become the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to administer fluids, medications and parenteral nutrition. However, it is well known that UVCs can lead to some serious complications, both mechanical and infective, including CLA...
Saved in:
Published in: | Life (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.13 (1), p.123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Life (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Corso, Lucia Buttera, Martina Candia, Francesco Sforza, Francesca Rossi, Katia Lugli, Licia Miselli, Francesca Bedetti, Luca Baraldi, Cecilia Lucaccioni, Laura Iughetti, Lorenzo Berardi, Alberto |
description | The use of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has become the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to administer fluids, medications and parenteral nutrition. However, it is well known that UVCs can lead to some serious complications, both mechanical and infective, including CLABSI (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections). Most authors recommend removing UVC within a maximum of 14 days from its placement. However, the last Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (INS) guidelines recommends limiting the UVC dwell time to 7 to 10 days, to reduce risks of infectious and thrombotic complications. These guidelines also suggest as an infection prevention strategy to remove UVC after 4 days, followed by the insertion of a PICC if a central line is still needed. Nevertheless, the maximum UVC dwell time to reduce the risk of CLABSI is still controversial, as well as the time of its replacement with a PICC. In this study we reviewed a total of 177 articles, found by using the PubMed database with the following search strings: "UVC AND neonates", "(neonate* OR newborn*) AND (UVC OR central catheter*) AND (infection*)". We also analyze the INS guidelines to provide the reader an updated overview on this topic. The purpose of this review is to give updated information on CVCs infectious risks by examining the literature in this field. These data could help clinicians in deciding the best time to remove or to replace the UVC with a PICC, to reduce CLABSIs risk. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the risk of CLABSI seems to be minimized when UVC is removed/replaced within 7 days from insertion and this indication is emerging from more recent and larger studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/life13010123 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2e8c402d2af1403e98e736bfad058a23</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A750340194</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2e8c402d2af1403e98e736bfad058a23</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A750340194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklFv0zAQxyMEYtPYG8_IEi8g0eHYSZzwgFSVAZGmIY2NV8uxz51LYhfbaeEb8LFx6BgtwpZs6_y7_-n-uix7muMzShv8ujcacopznBP6IDsmmJWznJHm4d77KDsNYYXTqsq8qovH2RGtKlZhRo6zn63VIKNxY0BXJnxNJ_QigkLRoZuhM72RokdfwE7EQsRbiODRuy30Pbo2AyBhFWrjlLfuhYQBbETGokvYds7b8AbN0aXwXkSzgQRtDGyR02gxej-h5xujwEp4kj3Sog9wenefZDfvz68XH2cXnz60i_nFTJasiTNRNkyTTmGGpapprqoGK8kKJSgtdFd0tKxFyYBhTUtZF3VXdoArXDUKNNENPcnana5yYsXX3gzC_-BOGP474PySCx-N7IETqGWBiSJC5wWm0NTAaNVpoXAqQmjServTWo_dAEqmfrzoD0QPf6y55Uu34U1dUVyyJPDiTsC7byOEyAcTZLJWWEh-c8KqmhBa4wl9_g-6cqO3yaqJYoSWlNK_1FKkBozVLtWVkyifsxLTAudNkaiz_1BpKxiMdBa0SfGDhJcHCYmJ8D0uxRgCbz9fHbKvdqz0LgQP-t6PHPNpaPn-0Cb82b6H9_CfEaW_AFP55fI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767235333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Corso, Lucia ; Buttera, Martina ; Candia, Francesco ; Sforza, Francesca ; Rossi, Katia ; Lugli, Licia ; Miselli, Francesca ; Bedetti, Luca ; Baraldi, Cecilia ; Lucaccioni, Laura ; Iughetti, Lorenzo ; Berardi, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Corso, Lucia ; Buttera, Martina ; Candia, Francesco ; Sforza, Francesca ; Rossi, Katia ; Lugli, Licia ; Miselli, Francesca ; Bedetti, Luca ; Baraldi, Cecilia ; Lucaccioni, Laura ; Iughetti, Lorenzo ; Berardi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>The use of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has become the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to administer fluids, medications and parenteral nutrition. However, it is well known that UVCs can lead to some serious complications, both mechanical and infective, including CLABSI (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections). Most authors recommend removing UVC within a maximum of 14 days from its placement. However, the last Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (INS) guidelines recommends limiting the UVC dwell time to 7 to 10 days, to reduce risks of infectious and thrombotic complications. These guidelines also suggest as an infection prevention strategy to remove UVC after 4 days, followed by the insertion of a PICC if a central line is still needed. Nevertheless, the maximum UVC dwell time to reduce the risk of CLABSI is still controversial, as well as the time of its replacement with a PICC. In this study we reviewed a total of 177 articles, found by using the PubMed database with the following search strings: "UVC AND neonates", "(neonate* OR newborn*) AND (UVC OR central catheter*) AND (infection*)". We also analyze the INS guidelines to provide the reader an updated overview on this topic. The purpose of this review is to give updated information on CVCs infectious risks by examining the literature in this field. These data could help clinicians in deciding the best time to remove or to replace the UVC with a PICC, to reduce CLABSIs risk. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the risk of CLABSI seems to be minimized when UVC is removed/replaced within 7 days from insertion and this indication is emerging from more recent and larger studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-1729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-1729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/life13010123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36676072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Birth weight ; Care and treatment ; Catheters ; CLABSI ; Complications and side effects ; Dwell time ; Gestational age ; Guidelines ; Infants (Newborn) ; Infection ; Insertion ; Intensive care ; Medical instruments ; Neonatal intensive care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Nosocomial infections ; Nutrition ; Parenteral nutrition ; Pediatric research ; Review ; Risk ; Risk factors ; Sepsis ; Thrombosis ; Umbilical cord ; Umbilical venous catheter ; UVC ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.13 (1), p.123</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3534-7499 ; 0000-0003-4960-2443 ; 0000-0003-0370-7872 ; 0000-0003-2102-2674 ; 0000-0001-5991-8949</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767235333/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767235333?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36676072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corso, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttera, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sforza, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugli, Licia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miselli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedetti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucaccioni, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iughetti, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berardi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence</title><title>Life (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Life (Basel)</addtitle><description>The use of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has become the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to administer fluids, medications and parenteral nutrition. However, it is well known that UVCs can lead to some serious complications, both mechanical and infective, including CLABSI (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections). Most authors recommend removing UVC within a maximum of 14 days from its placement. However, the last Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (INS) guidelines recommends limiting the UVC dwell time to 7 to 10 days, to reduce risks of infectious and thrombotic complications. These guidelines also suggest as an infection prevention strategy to remove UVC after 4 days, followed by the insertion of a PICC if a central line is still needed. Nevertheless, the maximum UVC dwell time to reduce the risk of CLABSI is still controversial, as well as the time of its replacement with a PICC. In this study we reviewed a total of 177 articles, found by using the PubMed database with the following search strings: "UVC AND neonates", "(neonate* OR newborn*) AND (UVC OR central catheter*) AND (infection*)". We also analyze the INS guidelines to provide the reader an updated overview on this topic. The purpose of this review is to give updated information on CVCs infectious risks by examining the literature in this field. These data could help clinicians in deciding the best time to remove or to replace the UVC with a PICC, to reduce CLABSIs risk. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the risk of CLABSI seems to be minimized when UVC is removed/replaced within 7 days from insertion and this indication is emerging from more recent and larger studies.</description><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>CLABSI</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Dwell time</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Insertion</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Neonatal intensive care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Parenteral nutrition</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Umbilical cord</subject><subject>Umbilical venous catheter</subject><subject>UVC</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>2075-1729</issn><issn>2075-1729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptklFv0zAQxyMEYtPYG8_IEi8g0eHYSZzwgFSVAZGmIY2NV8uxz51LYhfbaeEb8LFx6BgtwpZs6_y7_-n-uix7muMzShv8ujcacopznBP6IDsmmJWznJHm4d77KDsNYYXTqsq8qovH2RGtKlZhRo6zn63VIKNxY0BXJnxNJ_QigkLRoZuhM72RokdfwE7EQsRbiODRuy30Pbo2AyBhFWrjlLfuhYQBbETGokvYds7b8AbN0aXwXkSzgQRtDGyR02gxej-h5xujwEp4kj3Sog9wenefZDfvz68XH2cXnz60i_nFTJasiTNRNkyTTmGGpapprqoGK8kKJSgtdFd0tKxFyYBhTUtZF3VXdoArXDUKNNENPcnana5yYsXX3gzC_-BOGP474PySCx-N7IETqGWBiSJC5wWm0NTAaNVpoXAqQmjServTWo_dAEqmfrzoD0QPf6y55Uu34U1dUVyyJPDiTsC7byOEyAcTZLJWWEh-c8KqmhBa4wl9_g-6cqO3yaqJYoSWlNK_1FKkBozVLtWVkyifsxLTAudNkaiz_1BpKxiMdBa0SfGDhJcHCYmJ8D0uxRgCbz9fHbKvdqz0LgQP-t6PHPNpaPn-0Cb82b6H9_CfEaW_AFP55fI</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Corso, Lucia</creator><creator>Buttera, Martina</creator><creator>Candia, Francesco</creator><creator>Sforza, Francesca</creator><creator>Rossi, Katia</creator><creator>Lugli, Licia</creator><creator>Miselli, Francesca</creator><creator>Bedetti, Luca</creator><creator>Baraldi, Cecilia</creator><creator>Lucaccioni, Laura</creator><creator>Iughetti, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Berardi, Alberto</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-7499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-2443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-7872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-2674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5991-8949</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence</title><author>Corso, Lucia ; Buttera, Martina ; Candia, Francesco ; Sforza, Francesca ; Rossi, Katia ; Lugli, Licia ; Miselli, Francesca ; Bedetti, Luca ; Baraldi, Cecilia ; Lucaccioni, Laura ; Iughetti, Lorenzo ; Berardi, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>CLABSI</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Dwell time</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Insertion</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Neonatal intensive care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Parenteral nutrition</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Umbilical cord</topic><topic>Umbilical venous catheter</topic><topic>UVC</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corso, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttera, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sforza, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugli, Licia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miselli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedetti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucaccioni, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iughetti, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berardi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Science</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJÂ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Life (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corso, Lucia</au><au>Buttera, Martina</au><au>Candia, Francesco</au><au>Sforza, Francesca</au><au>Rossi, Katia</au><au>Lugli, Licia</au><au>Miselli, Francesca</au><au>Bedetti, Luca</au><au>Baraldi, Cecilia</au><au>Lucaccioni, Laura</au><au>Iughetti, Lorenzo</au><au>Berardi, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Life (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Life (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><pages>123-</pages><issn>2075-1729</issn><eissn>2075-1729</eissn><abstract>The use of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has become the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to administer fluids, medications and parenteral nutrition. However, it is well known that UVCs can lead to some serious complications, both mechanical and infective, including CLABSI (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections). Most authors recommend removing UVC within a maximum of 14 days from its placement. However, the last Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (INS) guidelines recommends limiting the UVC dwell time to 7 to 10 days, to reduce risks of infectious and thrombotic complications. These guidelines also suggest as an infection prevention strategy to remove UVC after 4 days, followed by the insertion of a PICC if a central line is still needed. Nevertheless, the maximum UVC dwell time to reduce the risk of CLABSI is still controversial, as well as the time of its replacement with a PICC. In this study we reviewed a total of 177 articles, found by using the PubMed database with the following search strings: "UVC AND neonates", "(neonate* OR newborn*) AND (UVC OR central catheter*) AND (infection*)". We also analyze the INS guidelines to provide the reader an updated overview on this topic. The purpose of this review is to give updated information on CVCs infectious risks by examining the literature in this field. These data could help clinicians in deciding the best time to remove or to replace the UVC with a PICC, to reduce CLABSIs risk. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the risk of CLABSI seems to be minimized when UVC is removed/replaced within 7 days from insertion and this indication is emerging from more recent and larger studies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36676072</pmid><doi>10.3390/life13010123</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-7499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-2443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-7872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-2674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5991-8949</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-1729 |
ispartof | Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.13 (1), p.123 |
issn | 2075-1729 2075-1729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2e8c402d2af1403e98e736bfad058a23 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Birth weight Care and treatment Catheters CLABSI Complications and side effects Dwell time Gestational age Guidelines Infants (Newborn) Infection Insertion Intensive care Medical instruments Neonatal intensive care Neonates Newborn babies Nosocomial infections Nutrition Parenteral nutrition Pediatric research Review Risk Risk factors Sepsis Thrombosis Umbilical cord Umbilical venous catheter UVC Veins & arteries |
title | Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A21%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infectious%20Risks%20Related%20to%20Umbilical%20Venous%20Catheter%20Dwell%20Time%20and%20Its%20Replacement%20in%20Newborns:%20A%20Narrative%20Review%20of%20Current%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Life%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Corso,%20Lucia&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.pages=123-&rft.issn=2075-1729&rft.eissn=2075-1729&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/life13010123&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA750340194%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-a597f2bd070cd831d690dc74da334fb4b358a57e70f35c848b5be06069def2f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767235333&rft_id=info:pmid/36676072&rft_galeid=A750340194&rfr_iscdi=true |