Loading…
The Association Between Self-Managed versus Clinician-Managed Abortion and Self-Reported Abortion Complications: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in India
To examine the association between self-managed abortion and the self-reported experience of abortion complications in India, a country with a high incidence of self-managed abortion. The study used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression analysis of data from the National Family Health...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of women's health 2023-01, Vol.15, p.1467-1473 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-54e34faf73af6cfbdf9c5aa5950f9648e17897e0c18ca5d5500116c6eb0a30743 |
container_end_page | 1473 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1467 |
container_title | International journal of women's health |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Goemans, Sophie Singh, Abhishek Yadav, Ajit Kumar McDougal, Lotus Raj, Anita Averbach, Sarah H |
description | To examine the association between self-managed abortion and the self-reported experience of abortion complications in India, a country with a high incidence of self-managed abortion.
The study used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression analysis of data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) of 2015-2016 to compare the odds of self-reported complications experienced during abortion between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions in India.
On average, self-managed abortions occurred earlier in gestation than clinician-managed abortions, 7.8 weeks and 11.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.001). Self-managed abortion was associated with fewer self-reported abortion-related complications than clinician-managed abortions when adjusted for covariates not including gestational age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.97). However, once adjusted for gestational age, there was no longer a clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in the odds of self-reported complications between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81, 1.18).
These findings suggest that people in India are using safe methods to self-manage abortions and support the hypothesis that self-managed abortion can improve access to abortion and reproductive choice without increasing risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2147/IJWH.S414599 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2f47dbfcbe6a44aea2ecf0ad00ea4e63</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A769581177</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2f47dbfcbe6a44aea2ecf0ad00ea4e63</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A769581177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-54e34faf73af6cfbdf9c5aa5950f9648e17897e0c18ca5d5500116c6eb0a30743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklFv0zAUhSMEYtPYG88oEhLigRS7seOEFxSiwYqGkOgQj9aNc916cu0Sp0P7H_vBOG2pWolYiqNzv3sU-9wkeUnJZEqZeD_7-ut6MmeU8ap6kpxTKqqMMkqfHn2fJZch3JH45HnUyufJWS5ExWnFzpPH2yWmdQheGRiMd-knHP4gunSOVmffwMECu_Qe-7AJaWONMxF0h0Ld-n7bBq7btfzAdZSOS41fra1RW_vwIa3TpvchZHNUowI2rePrIZiQGpfOXGfgRfJMgw14ud8vkp-fr26b6-zm-5dZU99kipNiyDjDnGnQIgddKN12ulIcgFec6KpgJVJRVgKJoqUC3nFOCKWFKrAlkBPB8otktvPtPNzJdW9W0D9ID0ZuBd8vJMQzKItyqpnoWq1aLIAxQJii0gQ6QhAYFnn0-rjzWm_aFXYK3dCDPTE9rTizlAt_LynhMT0yOrzdO_T-9wbDIFcmKLQWHPpNkNNS5FNOY-4Rfb1DFxD_zTjto6UacVmLouJlDF9EavIfKq4OV0Z5h9pE_aThzVHDEsEOy-DtZpvcKfhuB6oxyh714ZyUyHEw5TiYcj-YEX91fDcH-N8Y5n8BhX_fVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2873251214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Association Between Self-Managed versus Clinician-Managed Abortion and Self-Reported Abortion Complications: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in India</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goemans, Sophie ; Singh, Abhishek ; Yadav, Ajit Kumar ; McDougal, Lotus ; Raj, Anita ; Averbach, Sarah H</creator><creatorcontrib>Goemans, Sophie ; Singh, Abhishek ; Yadav, Ajit Kumar ; McDougal, Lotus ; Raj, Anita ; Averbach, Sarah H</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the association between self-managed abortion and the self-reported experience of abortion complications in India, a country with a high incidence of self-managed abortion.
The study used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression analysis of data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) of 2015-2016 to compare the odds of self-reported complications experienced during abortion between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions in India.
On average, self-managed abortions occurred earlier in gestation than clinician-managed abortions, 7.8 weeks and 11.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.001). Self-managed abortion was associated with fewer self-reported abortion-related complications than clinician-managed abortions when adjusted for covariates not including gestational age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.97). However, once adjusted for gestational age, there was no longer a clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in the odds of self-reported complications between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81, 1.18).
These findings suggest that people in India are using safe methods to self-manage abortions and support the hypothesis that self-managed abortion can improve access to abortion and reproductive choice without increasing risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1179-1411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S414599</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37795194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Analysis ; medication abortion ; mifepristone ; misoprostol ; Original Research ; Pregnancy ; reproductive autonomy ; reproductive choice ; self-use</subject><ispartof>International journal of women's health, 2023-01, Vol.15, p.1467-1473</ispartof><rights>2023 Goemans et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2023 Goemans et al. 2023 Goemans et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-54e34faf73af6cfbdf9c5aa5950f9648e17897e0c18ca5d5500116c6eb0a30743</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6263-4410 ; 0000-0002-3002-0489</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545903/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545903/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,36994,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goemans, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Ajit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougal, Lotus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Averbach, Sarah H</creatorcontrib><title>The Association Between Self-Managed versus Clinician-Managed Abortion and Self-Reported Abortion Complications: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in India</title><title>International journal of women's health</title><addtitle>Int J Womens Health</addtitle><description>To examine the association between self-managed abortion and the self-reported experience of abortion complications in India, a country with a high incidence of self-managed abortion.
The study used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression analysis of data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) of 2015-2016 to compare the odds of self-reported complications experienced during abortion between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions in India.
On average, self-managed abortions occurred earlier in gestation than clinician-managed abortions, 7.8 weeks and 11.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.001). Self-managed abortion was associated with fewer self-reported abortion-related complications than clinician-managed abortions when adjusted for covariates not including gestational age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.97). However, once adjusted for gestational age, there was no longer a clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in the odds of self-reported complications between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81, 1.18).
These findings suggest that people in India are using safe methods to self-manage abortions and support the hypothesis that self-managed abortion can improve access to abortion and reproductive choice without increasing risk.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>medication abortion</subject><subject>mifepristone</subject><subject>misoprostol</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>reproductive autonomy</subject><subject>reproductive choice</subject><subject>self-use</subject><issn>1179-1411</issn><issn>1179-1411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptklFv0zAUhSMEYtPYG88oEhLigRS7seOEFxSiwYqGkOgQj9aNc916cu0Sp0P7H_vBOG2pWolYiqNzv3sU-9wkeUnJZEqZeD_7-ut6MmeU8ap6kpxTKqqMMkqfHn2fJZch3JH45HnUyufJWS5ExWnFzpPH2yWmdQheGRiMd-knHP4gunSOVmffwMECu_Qe-7AJaWONMxF0h0Ld-n7bBq7btfzAdZSOS41fra1RW_vwIa3TpvchZHNUowI2rePrIZiQGpfOXGfgRfJMgw14ud8vkp-fr26b6-zm-5dZU99kipNiyDjDnGnQIgddKN12ulIcgFec6KpgJVJRVgKJoqUC3nFOCKWFKrAlkBPB8otktvPtPNzJdW9W0D9ID0ZuBd8vJMQzKItyqpnoWq1aLIAxQJii0gQ6QhAYFnn0-rjzWm_aFXYK3dCDPTE9rTizlAt_LynhMT0yOrzdO_T-9wbDIFcmKLQWHPpNkNNS5FNOY-4Rfb1DFxD_zTjto6UacVmLouJlDF9EavIfKq4OV0Z5h9pE_aThzVHDEsEOy-DtZpvcKfhuB6oxyh714ZyUyHEw5TiYcj-YEX91fDcH-N8Y5n8BhX_fVw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Goemans, Sophie</creator><creator>Singh, Abhishek</creator><creator>Yadav, Ajit Kumar</creator><creator>McDougal, Lotus</creator><creator>Raj, Anita</creator><creator>Averbach, Sarah H</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Dove</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-4410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-0489</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>The Association Between Self-Managed versus Clinician-Managed Abortion and Self-Reported Abortion Complications: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in India</title><author>Goemans, Sophie ; Singh, Abhishek ; Yadav, Ajit Kumar ; McDougal, Lotus ; Raj, Anita ; Averbach, Sarah H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-54e34faf73af6cfbdf9c5aa5950f9648e17897e0c18ca5d5500116c6eb0a30743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>medication abortion</topic><topic>mifepristone</topic><topic>misoprostol</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>reproductive autonomy</topic><topic>reproductive choice</topic><topic>self-use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goemans, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Ajit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougal, Lotus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Averbach, Sarah H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goemans, Sophie</au><au>Singh, Abhishek</au><au>Yadav, Ajit Kumar</au><au>McDougal, Lotus</au><au>Raj, Anita</au><au>Averbach, Sarah H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Association Between Self-Managed versus Clinician-Managed Abortion and Self-Reported Abortion Complications: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in India</atitle><jtitle>International journal of women's health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Womens Health</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><spage>1467</spage><epage>1473</epage><pages>1467-1473</pages><issn>1179-1411</issn><eissn>1179-1411</eissn><abstract>To examine the association between self-managed abortion and the self-reported experience of abortion complications in India, a country with a high incidence of self-managed abortion.
The study used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression analysis of data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) of 2015-2016 to compare the odds of self-reported complications experienced during abortion between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions in India.
On average, self-managed abortions occurred earlier in gestation than clinician-managed abortions, 7.8 weeks and 11.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.001). Self-managed abortion was associated with fewer self-reported abortion-related complications than clinician-managed abortions when adjusted for covariates not including gestational age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.97). However, once adjusted for gestational age, there was no longer a clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in the odds of self-reported complications between self-managed and clinician-managed abortions (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81, 1.18).
These findings suggest that people in India are using safe methods to self-manage abortions and support the hypothesis that self-managed abortion can improve access to abortion and reproductive choice without increasing risk.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>37795194</pmid><doi>10.2147/IJWH.S414599</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-4410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-0489</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1179-1411 |
ispartof | International journal of women's health, 2023-01, Vol.15, p.1467-1473 |
issn | 1179-1411 1179-1411 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2f47dbfcbe6a44aea2ecf0ad00ea4e63 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abortion Analysis medication abortion mifepristone misoprostol Original Research Pregnancy reproductive autonomy reproductive choice self-use |
title | The Association Between Self-Managed versus Clinician-Managed Abortion and Self-Reported Abortion Complications: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Association%20Between%20Self-Managed%20versus%20Clinician-Managed%20Abortion%20and%20Self-Reported%20Abortion%20Complications:%20A%20Cross-Sectional%20Analysis%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20women's%20health&rft.au=Goemans,%20Sophie&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.spage=1467&rft.epage=1473&rft.pages=1467-1473&rft.issn=1179-1411&rft.eissn=1179-1411&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/IJWH.S414599&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA769581177%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-54e34faf73af6cfbdf9c5aa5950f9648e17897e0c18ca5d5500116c6eb0a30743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2873251214&rft_id=info:pmid/37795194&rft_galeid=A769581177&rfr_iscdi=true |