"It means so much for me to have a choice": a qualitative study providing first-person perspectives on medication-free treatment in mental health care

• Published in: BMC psychiatry 2020-08, Vol.20 (1), p.399-399, Article 399
• Main Authors: Oedegaard, Christine H, Davidson, Larry, Stige, Brynjulf, Veseth, Marius, Blindheim, Anne, Garvik, Linda, Sørensen, Jan-Magne, Søraa, Øystein, Engebretsen, Ingunn Marie Stadskleiv
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antipsychotic agents; Antipsychotics; Choice learning; Collaboration; Communication; Decision making; Evidence-based medicine; Health aspects; Health care; Health care policy; Humans; Interpersonal relations; Interviews; Lived experience; Medical care quality; Medication; Mental disorders; Mental Health; Mental health care; Mental Health Services; Motivation; Music therapy; Norway; Patients; Psychiatry; Psychosis; Psychotic Disorders - drug therapy; Psychotropic drugs; Qualitative Research; Quality of care; Recovery; Recovery (Medical); Supervisors
• ISSN: 1471-244X; 1471-244X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02770-2

In 2016, the Western Norway Regional Health Authority started to integrate more evidence-based psychosocial interventions into the existing mental health care, emphasizing the right for persons with psychosis to choose medication-free treatment. This change emerged from the debate on the effectiveness and adverse effects of the use of antipsychotic medication. Aspects beyond symptom reduction, such as interpersonal relationships, increased understanding of one's own pattern of suffering, hope and motivation, are all considered important for the personal recovery process. This study explores whether these aspects were present in users' descriptions of their recovery processes within the medication-free treatment programme in Bergen, Western Norway. We interviewed ten patients diagnosed with psychosis who were eligible for medication-free services about their treatment experiences. Data were analysed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network approach. The findings show a global theme relating to personal recovery processes facilitated by the provision of more psychosocial treatment options, with three organizing subthemes: interpersonal relationships between patients and therapists, the patient's understanding of personal patterns of suffering, and personal motivation for self-agency in the recovery process. Participants described an improved relationship with therapists compared to previous experiences. Integrating more evidence-based psychosocial interventions into existing mental health services facilitated learning experiences regarding the choice of treatment, particularly the discontinuation of medication, and appeared to support participants' increased self-agency and motivation in their personal recovery processes. Health care in Norway is perhaps one step closer to optimizing care for people with psychosis, allowing for more patient choice and improving the dialogue and hence the interpersonal relationship between the patient and the therapist. Personal patterns of suffering can be explored within a system aiming to support and have a higher level of acceptance for the discontinuation of medication. Such a system requires personal agency in the treatment regimen, with more focus on personal coping strategies and more personal responsibility for the recovery process.