Loading…
Estimation of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure for Hypertension Identification from Photoplethysmography Signals
Continuous monitoring plays a crucial role in diagnosing hypertension, characterized by the increase in Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP). The gold-standard method for obtaining ABP involves the uncomfortable and invasive technique of cannulation. Conversely, ABP can be acquired non-invasively by using...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2024-03, Vol.14 (6), p.2470 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Continuous monitoring plays a crucial role in diagnosing hypertension, characterized by the increase in Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP). The gold-standard method for obtaining ABP involves the uncomfortable and invasive technique of cannulation. Conversely, ABP can be acquired non-invasively by using Photoplethysmography (PPG). This non-invasive approach offers the advantage of continuous BP monitoring outside a hospital setting and can be implemented in cost-effective wearable devices. PPG and ABP signals differ in scale values, which creates a non-linear relationship, opening avenues for the utilization of algorithms capable of detecting non-linear associations. In this study, we introduce Neural Model of Blood Pressure (NeuBP), which estimates systolic and diastolic values from PPG signals. The problem is treated as a binary classification task, distinguishing between Normotensive and Hypertensive categories. Furthermore, our research investigates NeuBP’s performance in classifying different BP categories, including Normotensive, Prehypertensive, Grade 1 Hypertensive, and Grade 2 Hypertensive cases. We evaluate our proposed method by using data from the publicly available MIMIC-III database. The experimental results demonstrate that NeuBP achieves results comparable to more complex models with fewer parameters. The mean absolute errors for systolic and diastolic values are 5.02 mmHg and 3.11 mmHg, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
DOI: | 10.3390/app14062470 |