Loading…

Limiting External Absorptivity of UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Sensors Increases Water Temperature Measurement Accuracy

Thermal mapping of surface waters and the land surface via UAVs offers exciting opportunities in many scientific disciplines; however, unresolved issues persist related to accuracy and drift of uncooled microbolometric thermal infrared (TIR) sensors. Curiously, most commercially available UAV-based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.14 (24), p.6356
Main Authors: O’Sullivan, Antóin M., Kurylyk, Barret L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page 6356
container_title Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 14
creator O’Sullivan, Antóin M.
Kurylyk, Barret L.
description Thermal mapping of surface waters and the land surface via UAVs offers exciting opportunities in many scientific disciplines; however, unresolved issues persist related to accuracy and drift of uncooled microbolometric thermal infrared (TIR) sensors. Curiously, most commercially available UAV-based TIR sensors are black, which will theoretically facilitate heating of the uncooled TIR sensor via absorbed solar radiation. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that modifying the surface absorptivity of uncooled TIR sensors can reduce thermal drift by limiting absorptance and associated microbolometer heating. We used two identical uncooled TIR sensors (DJI Zenmuse XT2) but retrofitted one with polished aluminum foil to alter the surface absorptivity and compared the temperature measurements from each sensor to the accurate measurements from instream temperature loggers. In addition, because TIR sensors are passive and measure longwave infrared radiation emitted from the environment, we tested the hypotheses that overcast conditions would reduce solar irradiance, and therefore induce thermal drift, and that increases in air temperature would induce thermal drift. The former is in contrast with the conceptual model of others who have proposed that flying in overcast conditions would increase sensor accuracy. We found the foil-shielded sensor yielded temperatures that were on average 2.2 °C more accurate than those of the matte black sensor (p < 0.0001). Further, we found positive correlations between light intensity (a proxy for incoming irradiance) and increased sensor accuracy for both sensors. Interestingly, light intensity explained 73% of the accuracy variability for the black sensor, but only 40% of the variability in accuracy deviations for the foil-shielded sensor. Unsurprisingly, an increase in air temperature led to a decrease in accuracy for both sensors, where air temperature explained 14% of the variability in accuracy for the black sensor and 31% of the accuracy variability for the foil-shielded sensor. We propose that the discrepancy between the amount of variability explained by light intensity and air temperature is due to changes in the heat energy budget arising from changes in the surface absorptivity. Additionally, we suggest fine-scale changes in river-bed reflectance led to errors in UAV thermal measurements. We conclude with a suite of guidelines for increasing the accuracy of uncooled UAV-based thermal mapping.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/rs14246356
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2fddcf3d8dcb4cc3915d5a67b2d12932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2fddcf3d8dcb4cc3915d5a67b2d12932</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2756780040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1vEzEQXaEiUZVe-AWWuFXa4q_17h7TqoVIQRxI4Gh5x-OyUXadjh1ELvx2XFIV5vJGb968J81U1TvBr5Xq-QdKQkttVGNeVeeSt7LWspdn__VvqsuUtryUUqLn-rz6vRqnMY_zA7v7lZFmt2OLIUXa5_HnmI8sBrZZfKtvXELPNjPEuCvN-gfSVKTLOZCjQnzFuSylQgBh0Sb23RU7tsZpj-TygZB9LoOCE86ZLQAO5OD4tnod3C7h5TNeVJv7u_Xtp3r15ePydrGqQRmRa9OZBlolvTcYemMkd4PqhdAK9CC4b7AzoQEDGoWQum9b1asGQivQ8K4L6qJannx9dFu7p3FydLTRjfYvEenBOsoj7NDK4D0E5TsPgwYoMY1vnGkH6YXslSxe709ee4qPB0zZbuPh6XLJyrYxbce55kV1dVIBxZQIw0uq4PbpXfbfu9QfhS2IDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756780040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limiting External Absorptivity of UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Sensors Increases Water Temperature Measurement Accuracy</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>O’Sullivan, Antóin M. ; Kurylyk, Barret L.</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Antóin M. ; Kurylyk, Barret L.</creatorcontrib><description>Thermal mapping of surface waters and the land surface via UAVs offers exciting opportunities in many scientific disciplines; however, unresolved issues persist related to accuracy and drift of uncooled microbolometric thermal infrared (TIR) sensors. Curiously, most commercially available UAV-based TIR sensors are black, which will theoretically facilitate heating of the uncooled TIR sensor via absorbed solar radiation. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that modifying the surface absorptivity of uncooled TIR sensors can reduce thermal drift by limiting absorptance and associated microbolometer heating. We used two identical uncooled TIR sensors (DJI Zenmuse XT2) but retrofitted one with polished aluminum foil to alter the surface absorptivity and compared the temperature measurements from each sensor to the accurate measurements from instream temperature loggers. In addition, because TIR sensors are passive and measure longwave infrared radiation emitted from the environment, we tested the hypotheses that overcast conditions would reduce solar irradiance, and therefore induce thermal drift, and that increases in air temperature would induce thermal drift. The former is in contrast with the conceptual model of others who have proposed that flying in overcast conditions would increase sensor accuracy. We found the foil-shielded sensor yielded temperatures that were on average 2.2 °C more accurate than those of the matte black sensor (p &lt; 0.0001). Further, we found positive correlations between light intensity (a proxy for incoming irradiance) and increased sensor accuracy for both sensors. Interestingly, light intensity explained 73% of the accuracy variability for the black sensor, but only 40% of the variability in accuracy deviations for the foil-shielded sensor. Unsurprisingly, an increase in air temperature led to a decrease in accuracy for both sensors, where air temperature explained 14% of the variability in accuracy for the black sensor and 31% of the accuracy variability for the foil-shielded sensor. We propose that the discrepancy between the amount of variability explained by light intensity and air temperature is due to changes in the heat energy budget arising from changes in the surface absorptivity. Additionally, we suggest fine-scale changes in river-bed reflectance led to errors in UAV thermal measurements. We conclude with a suite of guidelines for increasing the accuracy of uncooled UAV-based thermal mapping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs14246356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Absorptance ; Absorptivity ; Accuracy ; Air temperature ; Aluminum ; Constraining ; Drift ; emissivity ; Energy budget ; Groundwater discharge ; Heat ; Heating ; Hydrology ; Hypotheses ; I.R. radiation ; Infrared detectors ; Infrared radiation ; Irradiance ; Light intensity ; Long wave radiation ; Luminous intensity ; Mapping ; Metal foils ; Radiation ; Radiation measurement ; Remote sensing ; Retrofitting ; River beds ; river temperature ; Sensors ; Solar radiation ; Surface chemistry ; Surface water ; Temperature measurement ; thermal infrared ; Thermal mapping ; Thermal measurement ; thermal refuges ; Variability ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.14 (24), p.6356</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8244-3838</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2756780040/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2756780040?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Antóin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurylyk, Barret L.</creatorcontrib><title>Limiting External Absorptivity of UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Sensors Increases Water Temperature Measurement Accuracy</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Thermal mapping of surface waters and the land surface via UAVs offers exciting opportunities in many scientific disciplines; however, unresolved issues persist related to accuracy and drift of uncooled microbolometric thermal infrared (TIR) sensors. Curiously, most commercially available UAV-based TIR sensors are black, which will theoretically facilitate heating of the uncooled TIR sensor via absorbed solar radiation. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that modifying the surface absorptivity of uncooled TIR sensors can reduce thermal drift by limiting absorptance and associated microbolometer heating. We used two identical uncooled TIR sensors (DJI Zenmuse XT2) but retrofitted one with polished aluminum foil to alter the surface absorptivity and compared the temperature measurements from each sensor to the accurate measurements from instream temperature loggers. In addition, because TIR sensors are passive and measure longwave infrared radiation emitted from the environment, we tested the hypotheses that overcast conditions would reduce solar irradiance, and therefore induce thermal drift, and that increases in air temperature would induce thermal drift. The former is in contrast with the conceptual model of others who have proposed that flying in overcast conditions would increase sensor accuracy. We found the foil-shielded sensor yielded temperatures that were on average 2.2 °C more accurate than those of the matte black sensor (p &lt; 0.0001). Further, we found positive correlations between light intensity (a proxy for incoming irradiance) and increased sensor accuracy for both sensors. Interestingly, light intensity explained 73% of the accuracy variability for the black sensor, but only 40% of the variability in accuracy deviations for the foil-shielded sensor. Unsurprisingly, an increase in air temperature led to a decrease in accuracy for both sensors, where air temperature explained 14% of the variability in accuracy for the black sensor and 31% of the accuracy variability for the foil-shielded sensor. We propose that the discrepancy between the amount of variability explained by light intensity and air temperature is due to changes in the heat energy budget arising from changes in the surface absorptivity. Additionally, we suggest fine-scale changes in river-bed reflectance led to errors in UAV thermal measurements. We conclude with a suite of guidelines for increasing the accuracy of uncooled UAV-based thermal mapping.</description><subject>Absorptance</subject><subject>Absorptivity</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Constraining</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>emissivity</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Groundwater discharge</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>I.R. radiation</subject><subject>Infrared detectors</subject><subject>Infrared radiation</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Light intensity</subject><subject>Long wave radiation</subject><subject>Luminous intensity</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Metal foils</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation measurement</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>River beds</subject><subject>river temperature</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Surface chemistry</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Temperature measurement</subject><subject>thermal infrared</subject><subject>Thermal mapping</subject><subject>Thermal measurement</subject><subject>thermal refuges</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1vEzEQXaEiUZVe-AWWuFXa4q_17h7TqoVIQRxI4Gh5x-OyUXadjh1ELvx2XFIV5vJGb968J81U1TvBr5Xq-QdKQkttVGNeVeeSt7LWspdn__VvqsuUtryUUqLn-rz6vRqnMY_zA7v7lZFmt2OLIUXa5_HnmI8sBrZZfKtvXELPNjPEuCvN-gfSVKTLOZCjQnzFuSylQgBh0Sb23RU7tsZpj-TygZB9LoOCE86ZLQAO5OD4tnod3C7h5TNeVJv7u_Xtp3r15ePydrGqQRmRa9OZBlolvTcYemMkd4PqhdAK9CC4b7AzoQEDGoWQum9b1asGQivQ8K4L6qJannx9dFu7p3FydLTRjfYvEenBOsoj7NDK4D0E5TsPgwYoMY1vnGkH6YXslSxe709ee4qPB0zZbuPh6XLJyrYxbce55kV1dVIBxZQIw0uq4PbpXfbfu9QfhS2IDg</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>O’Sullivan, Antóin M.</creator><creator>Kurylyk, Barret L.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-3838</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Limiting External Absorptivity of UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Sensors Increases Water Temperature Measurement Accuracy</title><author>O’Sullivan, Antóin M. ; Kurylyk, Barret L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Absorptance</topic><topic>Absorptivity</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Constraining</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>emissivity</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Groundwater discharge</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>I.R. radiation</topic><topic>Infrared detectors</topic><topic>Infrared radiation</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Light intensity</topic><topic>Long wave radiation</topic><topic>Luminous intensity</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Metal foils</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation measurement</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>River beds</topic><topic>river temperature</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Surface chemistry</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Temperature measurement</topic><topic>thermal infrared</topic><topic>Thermal mapping</topic><topic>Thermal measurement</topic><topic>thermal refuges</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Antóin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurylyk, Barret L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Sullivan, Antóin M.</au><au>Kurylyk, Barret L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limiting External Absorptivity of UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Sensors Increases Water Temperature Measurement Accuracy</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>6356</spage><pages>6356-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>Thermal mapping of surface waters and the land surface via UAVs offers exciting opportunities in many scientific disciplines; however, unresolved issues persist related to accuracy and drift of uncooled microbolometric thermal infrared (TIR) sensors. Curiously, most commercially available UAV-based TIR sensors are black, which will theoretically facilitate heating of the uncooled TIR sensor via absorbed solar radiation. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that modifying the surface absorptivity of uncooled TIR sensors can reduce thermal drift by limiting absorptance and associated microbolometer heating. We used two identical uncooled TIR sensors (DJI Zenmuse XT2) but retrofitted one with polished aluminum foil to alter the surface absorptivity and compared the temperature measurements from each sensor to the accurate measurements from instream temperature loggers. In addition, because TIR sensors are passive and measure longwave infrared radiation emitted from the environment, we tested the hypotheses that overcast conditions would reduce solar irradiance, and therefore induce thermal drift, and that increases in air temperature would induce thermal drift. The former is in contrast with the conceptual model of others who have proposed that flying in overcast conditions would increase sensor accuracy. We found the foil-shielded sensor yielded temperatures that were on average 2.2 °C more accurate than those of the matte black sensor (p &lt; 0.0001). Further, we found positive correlations between light intensity (a proxy for incoming irradiance) and increased sensor accuracy for both sensors. Interestingly, light intensity explained 73% of the accuracy variability for the black sensor, but only 40% of the variability in accuracy deviations for the foil-shielded sensor. Unsurprisingly, an increase in air temperature led to a decrease in accuracy for both sensors, where air temperature explained 14% of the variability in accuracy for the black sensor and 31% of the accuracy variability for the foil-shielded sensor. We propose that the discrepancy between the amount of variability explained by light intensity and air temperature is due to changes in the heat energy budget arising from changes in the surface absorptivity. Additionally, we suggest fine-scale changes in river-bed reflectance led to errors in UAV thermal measurements. We conclude with a suite of guidelines for increasing the accuracy of uncooled UAV-based thermal mapping.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs14246356</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-3838</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-4292
ispartof Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.14 (24), p.6356
issn 2072-4292
2072-4292
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2fddcf3d8dcb4cc3915d5a67b2d12932
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Absorptance
Absorptivity
Accuracy
Air temperature
Aluminum
Constraining
Drift
emissivity
Energy budget
Groundwater discharge
Heat
Heating
Hydrology
Hypotheses
I.R. radiation
Infrared detectors
Infrared radiation
Irradiance
Light intensity
Long wave radiation
Luminous intensity
Mapping
Metal foils
Radiation
Radiation measurement
Remote sensing
Retrofitting
River beds
river temperature
Sensors
Solar radiation
Surface chemistry
Surface water
Temperature measurement
thermal infrared
Thermal mapping
Thermal measurement
thermal refuges
Variability
Water temperature
title Limiting External Absorptivity of UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Sensors Increases Water Temperature Measurement Accuracy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A53%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limiting%20External%20Absorptivity%20of%20UAV-Based%20Uncooled%20Thermal%20Infrared%20Sensors%20Increases%20Water%20Temperature%20Measurement%20Accuracy&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Sullivan,%20Ant%C3%B3in%20M.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6356&rft.pages=6356-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs14246356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2756780040%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6865c732dd6ef96620ab391143c4b10d5e86f5c6c4e11249773935cf71e6088f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756780040&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true