Loading…

Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes

The risk preferences of patients with diabetes have profound effects on the progression of complications. The present study aimed to clarify whether the preferences of patients with diabetes and retinopathy are deliberately risk-seeking or irrational and whether this propensity is specific to those...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity metabolic syndrome and obesity, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.4961-4971
Main Authors: Emoto, Naoya, Soga, Akimi, Fukuda, Izumi, Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko, Harada, Taro, Koyano, Hajime M, Goto, Rei, Sugihara, Hitoshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3
container_end_page 4971
container_issue
container_start_page 4961
container_title Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity
container_volume 13
creator Emoto, Naoya
Soga, Akimi
Fukuda, Izumi
Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko
Harada, Taro
Koyano, Hajime M
Goto, Rei
Sugihara, Hitoshi
description The risk preferences of patients with diabetes have profound effects on the progression of complications. The present study aimed to clarify whether the preferences of patients with diabetes and retinopathy are deliberately risk-seeking or irrational and whether this propensity is specific to those with retinopathy or is also found in patients without retinopathy compared with those without diabetes. A total of 394 patients with diabetes (264 without retinopathy and 130 with retinopathy) and 198 patients without diabetes agreed to participate in this survey. The questions were modified versions of those from the Japan Household Survey on Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction, which sought to determine the participants' personal socioeconomic status and risk preferences. In the questionnaires, responses were analyzed by determining the participants' willingness to pay for a lottery ticket and for an insurance policy. Irrational responses were defined as violations of two axioms of the Expected Utility Theory: completeness and transitivity. The incidence of irrational responses increased with age and was associated with educational level. The incidence of irrational responses was significantly higher in patients with retinopathy than in those without retinopathy after adjusting for age and educational level. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irrational responses between patients with diabetes but without retinopathy and those without diabetes. The risk-seeking behavior of patients with diabetes and retinopathy was not deliberate but was irrational under uncertainty. Medical professionals should be aware of their patients' propensity to make irrational decisions, which is an important risk factor for the progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes regardless of age and educational level.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/DMSO.S283591
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30651d7c86d44cda84fa53f96b9b3dfb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A649683111</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_30651d7c86d44cda84fa53f96b9b3dfb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A649683111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v0zAYhyMEYtPYjTOKhIQ40GLHSWxfkKaOP5WGNrZxthz7TeOR2sV2QP0kfF2ctqtaRC5OnOd9ovz8y7KXGE0LXNL3l1_vrqd3BSMVx0-yU4wpm1CE6NOD-5PsPIQHNF4UlUXxPDshhNCa1Pw0-zP3XkbjrOzzWwgrZwOEPLr81oQf-Y2HFjxYBfm3AcLIWWl8Ipp1fpPmwMaQ_zaxyy-NbCDC7sn5zeqGmKzRWLeSsVvn0up85pYr6U1wdovedy7Ann7UvMietbIPcL5bz7Lvnz7ez75Mrq4_z2cXVxNV0TpOSKlpqSVQhlDZUJBS8QYajnWDClojIEpLXCCuldTA6qZFvC1Z1SrFGEBDzrL51qudfBArb5bSr4WTRmw2nF8I6aNRPQiC6gprqlityzJpWdnKirS8bnhDdDu6Pmxdq6FZglYpHC_7I-nxG2s6sXC_BKVVxRhJgrc7gXc_x7zF0gQFfS8tuCGIoqSEpyOkI_r6H_TBDT6d4oZCtCo4P6AWMv2Asa1L31WjVFzUJa8ZwRgnavofSo6JLY1yFlqT9o8G3hwMdCD72AXXD2M_wjH4bgsq70JIZdqHgZEYCyzGAotdgRP-6jDAPfxYV_IXaDbuRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470752993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Emoto, Naoya ; Soga, Akimi ; Fukuda, Izumi ; Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko ; Harada, Taro ; Koyano, Hajime M ; Goto, Rei ; Sugihara, Hitoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Emoto, Naoya ; Soga, Akimi ; Fukuda, Izumi ; Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko ; Harada, Taro ; Koyano, Hajime M ; Goto, Rei ; Sugihara, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><description>The risk preferences of patients with diabetes have profound effects on the progression of complications. The present study aimed to clarify whether the preferences of patients with diabetes and retinopathy are deliberately risk-seeking or irrational and whether this propensity is specific to those with retinopathy or is also found in patients without retinopathy compared with those without diabetes. A total of 394 patients with diabetes (264 without retinopathy and 130 with retinopathy) and 198 patients without diabetes agreed to participate in this survey. The questions were modified versions of those from the Japan Household Survey on Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction, which sought to determine the participants' personal socioeconomic status and risk preferences. In the questionnaires, responses were analyzed by determining the participants' willingness to pay for a lottery ticket and for an insurance policy. Irrational responses were defined as violations of two axioms of the Expected Utility Theory: completeness and transitivity. The incidence of irrational responses increased with age and was associated with educational level. The incidence of irrational responses was significantly higher in patients with retinopathy than in those without retinopathy after adjusting for age and educational level. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irrational responses between patients with diabetes but without retinopathy and those without diabetes. The risk-seeking behavior of patients with diabetes and retinopathy was not deliberate but was irrational under uncertainty. Medical professionals should be aware of their patients' propensity to make irrational decisions, which is an important risk factor for the progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes regardless of age and educational level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-7007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-7007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S283591</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33376369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavioral economics ; cognitive function ; Comparative analysis ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer preferences ; Data analysis ; Development and progression ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diabetics ; Disease ; educational level ; Expected utility ; expected utility theory ; Health surveys ; Insurance policies ; Lotteries ; Marketing research ; Metabolic disorders ; Original Research ; Patients ; Preferences ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Socioeconomic factors ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.4961-4971</ispartof><rights>2020 Emoto et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Emoto et al. 2020 Emoto et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2026-4057</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2470752993/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2470752993?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emoto, Naoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Akimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Izumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Taro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyano, Hajime M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Rei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugihara, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes</title><title>Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity</title><addtitle>Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes</addtitle><description>The risk preferences of patients with diabetes have profound effects on the progression of complications. The present study aimed to clarify whether the preferences of patients with diabetes and retinopathy are deliberately risk-seeking or irrational and whether this propensity is specific to those with retinopathy or is also found in patients without retinopathy compared with those without diabetes. A total of 394 patients with diabetes (264 without retinopathy and 130 with retinopathy) and 198 patients without diabetes agreed to participate in this survey. The questions were modified versions of those from the Japan Household Survey on Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction, which sought to determine the participants' personal socioeconomic status and risk preferences. In the questionnaires, responses were analyzed by determining the participants' willingness to pay for a lottery ticket and for an insurance policy. Irrational responses were defined as violations of two axioms of the Expected Utility Theory: completeness and transitivity. The incidence of irrational responses increased with age and was associated with educational level. The incidence of irrational responses was significantly higher in patients with retinopathy than in those without retinopathy after adjusting for age and educational level. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irrational responses between patients with diabetes but without retinopathy and those without diabetes. The risk-seeking behavior of patients with diabetes and retinopathy was not deliberate but was irrational under uncertainty. Medical professionals should be aware of their patients' propensity to make irrational decisions, which is an important risk factor for the progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes regardless of age and educational level.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>cognitive function</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer preferences</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diabetics</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>educational level</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>expected utility theory</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Lotteries</subject><subject>Marketing research</subject><subject>Metabolic disorders</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1178-7007</issn><issn>1178-7007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v0zAYhyMEYtPYjTOKhIQ40GLHSWxfkKaOP5WGNrZxthz7TeOR2sV2QP0kfF2ctqtaRC5OnOd9ovz8y7KXGE0LXNL3l1_vrqd3BSMVx0-yU4wpm1CE6NOD-5PsPIQHNF4UlUXxPDshhNCa1Pw0-zP3XkbjrOzzWwgrZwOEPLr81oQf-Y2HFjxYBfm3AcLIWWl8Ipp1fpPmwMaQ_zaxyy-NbCDC7sn5zeqGmKzRWLeSsVvn0up85pYr6U1wdovedy7Ann7UvMietbIPcL5bz7Lvnz7ez75Mrq4_z2cXVxNV0TpOSKlpqSVQhlDZUJBS8QYajnWDClojIEpLXCCuldTA6qZFvC1Z1SrFGEBDzrL51qudfBArb5bSr4WTRmw2nF8I6aNRPQiC6gprqlityzJpWdnKirS8bnhDdDu6Pmxdq6FZglYpHC_7I-nxG2s6sXC_BKVVxRhJgrc7gXc_x7zF0gQFfS8tuCGIoqSEpyOkI_r6H_TBDT6d4oZCtCo4P6AWMv2Asa1L31WjVFzUJa8ZwRgnavofSo6JLY1yFlqT9o8G3hwMdCD72AXXD2M_wjH4bgsq70JIZdqHgZEYCyzGAotdgRP-6jDAPfxYV_IXaDbuRw</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Emoto, Naoya</creator><creator>Soga, Akimi</creator><creator>Fukuda, Izumi</creator><creator>Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko</creator><creator>Harada, Taro</creator><creator>Koyano, Hajime M</creator><creator>Goto, Rei</creator><creator>Sugihara, Hitoshi</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-4057</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes</title><author>Emoto, Naoya ; Soga, Akimi ; Fukuda, Izumi ; Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko ; Harada, Taro ; Koyano, Hajime M ; Goto, Rei ; Sugihara, Hitoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>cognitive function</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer preferences</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diabetics</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>educational level</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>expected utility theory</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Lotteries</topic><topic>Marketing research</topic><topic>Metabolic disorders</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emoto, Naoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Akimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Izumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Taro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyano, Hajime M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Rei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugihara, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emoto, Naoya</au><au>Soga, Akimi</au><au>Fukuda, Izumi</au><au>Tanimura-Inagaki, Kyoko</au><au>Harada, Taro</au><au>Koyano, Hajime M</au><au>Goto, Rei</au><au>Sugihara, Hitoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>4961</spage><epage>4971</epage><pages>4961-4971</pages><issn>1178-7007</issn><eissn>1178-7007</eissn><abstract>The risk preferences of patients with diabetes have profound effects on the progression of complications. The present study aimed to clarify whether the preferences of patients with diabetes and retinopathy are deliberately risk-seeking or irrational and whether this propensity is specific to those with retinopathy or is also found in patients without retinopathy compared with those without diabetes. A total of 394 patients with diabetes (264 without retinopathy and 130 with retinopathy) and 198 patients without diabetes agreed to participate in this survey. The questions were modified versions of those from the Japan Household Survey on Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction, which sought to determine the participants' personal socioeconomic status and risk preferences. In the questionnaires, responses were analyzed by determining the participants' willingness to pay for a lottery ticket and for an insurance policy. Irrational responses were defined as violations of two axioms of the Expected Utility Theory: completeness and transitivity. The incidence of irrational responses increased with age and was associated with educational level. The incidence of irrational responses was significantly higher in patients with retinopathy than in those without retinopathy after adjusting for age and educational level. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irrational responses between patients with diabetes but without retinopathy and those without diabetes. The risk-seeking behavior of patients with diabetes and retinopathy was not deliberate but was irrational under uncertainty. Medical professionals should be aware of their patients' propensity to make irrational decisions, which is an important risk factor for the progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes regardless of age and educational level.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>33376369</pmid><doi>10.2147/DMSO.S283591</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-4057</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-7007
ispartof Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.4961-4971
issn 1178-7007
1178-7007
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30651d7c86d44cda84fa53f96b9b3dfb
source Taylor & Francis; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Behavior
Behavioral economics
cognitive function
Comparative analysis
Consumer behavior
Consumer preferences
Data analysis
Development and progression
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Diabetics
Disease
educational level
Expected utility
expected utility theory
Health surveys
Insurance policies
Lotteries
Marketing research
Metabolic disorders
Original Research
Patients
Preferences
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Socioeconomic factors
Surveys
title Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T13%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Irrational%20Responses%20to%20Risk%20Preference%20Questionnaires%20by%20Patients%20with%20Diabetes%20with%20or%20without%20Retinopathy%20and%20Comparison%20with%20Those%20without%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Diabetes,%20metabolic%20syndrome%20and%20obesity&rft.au=Emoto,%20Naoya&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=4961&rft.epage=4971&rft.pages=4961-4971&rft.issn=1178-7007&rft.eissn=1178-7007&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/DMSO.S283591&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA649683111%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34d74dae78004b7eaac9beb91db02760e3cda1209dcade86bf09f485fcc88eeb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470752993&rft_id=info:pmid/33376369&rft_galeid=A649683111&rfr_iscdi=true