"I'm outta here!": a qualitative investigation into why Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people self-discharge from hospital

• Published in: BMC health services research 2021-09, Vol.21 (1), p.907-10, Article 907
• Main Authors: Askew, Deborah A, Foley, Wendy, Kirk, Corey, Williamson, Daniel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Admission and discharge; Australian aborigines; Culturally safe health care; Data collection; Demographic aspects; Discharge against medical advice; Health aspects; Health care; Health services; Health Services, Indigenous; Hospitals; Humans; Institutional racism; Interviews; Medical records; Medical research; Native peoples; Patient Discharge; Patient rights; Patient-centered care; Patients; Patients' rights; Person centred care; Prevention; Racism; Researchers; Self-discharge; Social aspects
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06880-9

Occasions of self-discharge from health services before being seen by a health profession or against medical advice are often used by health systems as an indicator of quality care. People self-discharge because of factors such as dissatisfaction with care, poor communication, long waiting times, and feeling better in addition to external factors such as family and employment responsibilities. These factors, plus a lack of cultural safety, and interpersonal and institutional racism contribute to the disproportionately higher rates of Indigenous people self-discharging from hospital. This qualitative study aimed to increase understanding about the causative and contextual factors that culminate in people self-discharging and identify opportunities to improve the hospital experience for all. Semi-structured interviews with five Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (hereafter, respectfully, Indigenous) people and six non-Indigenous people who had self-discharged from a major tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Study participants all respected hospitals' vital role of caring for the sick, but the cumulative impact of unmet needs created a tipping point whereby they concluded that remaining in hospital would compromise their health and wellbeing. Five key categories of unmet needs were identified - the need for information; confidence in the quality of care; respectful treatment; basic comforts; and peace of mind. Although Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants had similar unmet needs, for the former, the deleterious impact of unmet needs was compounded by racist and discriminatory behaviours they experienced while in hospital. Respectful, empathetic, person-centred care is likely to result in patients' needs being met, improve the hospital experience and reduce the risk of people self-discharging. For Indigenous people, the ongoing legacy of white colonisation is embodied in everyday lived experiences of interpersonal and institutional racism. Racist and discriminatory behaviours experienced whilst hospitalised are thus rendered both more visible and more traumatic, and exacerbate the deleterious effect of unmet needs. Decreasing self-discharge events requires a shift of thinking away from perceiving this as the behaviour of a deviant individual, but rather as a quality improvement opportunity to ensure that all patients are cared for in a respectful and person-centred manner.