Loading…

Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions

Ensemble forecasts aim at framing the uncertainties of the potential future development of the hydro-meteorological situation. A probabilistic evaluation can be used to communicate forecast uncertainty to decision makers. Here an operational system for ensemble based flood forecasting is presented,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural hazards and earth system sciences 2009-08, Vol.9 (4), p.1529-1540
Main Authors: Dietrich, J., Schumann, A. H., Redetzky, M., Walther, J., Denhard, M., Wang, Y., Pfützner, B., Büttner, U.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-9cb9feb8ab470f3eeb1400d7a32f0924310cf760040523e5db1ab5e9120dd85e3
cites
container_end_page 1540
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1529
container_title Natural hazards and earth system sciences
container_volume 9
creator Dietrich, J.
Schumann, A. H.
Redetzky, M.
Walther, J.
Denhard, M.
Wang, Y.
Pfützner, B.
Büttner, U.
description Ensemble forecasts aim at framing the uncertainties of the potential future development of the hydro-meteorological situation. A probabilistic evaluation can be used to communicate forecast uncertainty to decision makers. Here an operational system for ensemble based flood forecasting is presented, which combines forecasts from the European COSMO-LEPS, SRNWP-PEPS and COSMO-DE prediction systems. A multi-model lagged average super-ensemble is generated by recombining members from different runs of these meteorological forecast systems. A subset of the super-ensemble is selected based on a priori model weights, which are obtained from ensemble calibration. Flood forecasts are simulated by the conceptual rainfall-runoff-model ArcEGMO. Parameter uncertainty of the model is represented by a parameter ensemble, which is a priori generated from a comprehensive uncertainty analysis during model calibration. The use of a computationally efficient hydrological model within a flood management system allows us to compute the hydro-meteorological model chain for all members of the sub-ensemble. The model chain is not re-computed before new ensemble forecasts are available, but the probabilistic assessment of the output is updated when new information from deterministic short range forecasts or from assimilation of measured data becomes available. For hydraulic modelling, with the desired result of a probabilistic inundation map with high spatial resolution, a replacement model can help to overcome computational limitations. A prototype of the developed framework has been applied for a case study in the Mulde river basin. However these techniques, in particular the probabilistic assessment and the derivation of decision rules are still in their infancy. Further research is necessary and promising.
doi_str_mv 10.5194/nhess-9-1529-2009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30b9c193d0c94f4d8b6ec6a7f73ad993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_30b9c193d0c94f4d8b6ec6a7f73ad993</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2717179061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-9cb9feb8ab470f3eeb1400d7a32f0924310cf760040523e5db1ab5e9120dd85e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcuKFDEUhgtRcBx9AHcBwV3pyaW6Ku6GwcvAgBtdh1Ry0qatStqc9KLfwwc2NT2IuMohfP-XcP6ue83h3cC1ep9-IFGvez4I3QsA_aS74rtJ9VpP_Ok_8_PuBdEBQOhBwVX3-4aoJWPas1NyWKqNqUYkFhMLS86ehVzQWaq0TcyjixRzYqv92UIf2LHkmuv5iCwHZhPLRyy2NsIuj4LVJrvHFVNldKaKa3NX3G9UexUT4Tov2EToo9uS9LJ7FuxC-OrxvO6-f_r47fZLf__1893tzX3v1Khrr92sA86TndUIQSLOXAH40UoRQAslObgw7gAUDELi4Gdu5wE1F-D9NKC87u4uXp_twRxLXG05m2yjebjIZW9sqdEtaCTM2nEtPTitgvLTvEO3s2MYpfVay-Z6e3G1hfw6IVWzRnK4LDZhPpERMEkxTlMD3_wHHvKptHWR4SBGIQauhkbxC-VKJioY_n6Pg9kaNw-NG222xs3WuPwD3NakLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027225145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Dietrich, J. ; Schumann, A. H. ; Redetzky, M. ; Walther, J. ; Denhard, M. ; Wang, Y. ; Pfützner, B. ; Büttner, U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J. ; Schumann, A. H. ; Redetzky, M. ; Walther, J. ; Denhard, M. ; Wang, Y. ; Pfützner, B. ; Büttner, U.</creatorcontrib><description>Ensemble forecasts aim at framing the uncertainties of the potential future development of the hydro-meteorological situation. A probabilistic evaluation can be used to communicate forecast uncertainty to decision makers. Here an operational system for ensemble based flood forecasting is presented, which combines forecasts from the European COSMO-LEPS, SRNWP-PEPS and COSMO-DE prediction systems. A multi-model lagged average super-ensemble is generated by recombining members from different runs of these meteorological forecast systems. A subset of the super-ensemble is selected based on a priori model weights, which are obtained from ensemble calibration. Flood forecasts are simulated by the conceptual rainfall-runoff-model ArcEGMO. Parameter uncertainty of the model is represented by a parameter ensemble, which is a priori generated from a comprehensive uncertainty analysis during model calibration. The use of a computationally efficient hydrological model within a flood management system allows us to compute the hydro-meteorological model chain for all members of the sub-ensemble. The model chain is not re-computed before new ensemble forecasts are available, but the probabilistic assessment of the output is updated when new information from deterministic short range forecasts or from assimilation of measured data becomes available. For hydraulic modelling, with the desired result of a probabilistic inundation map with high spatial resolution, a replacement model can help to overcome computational limitations. A prototype of the developed framework has been applied for a case study in the Mulde river basin. However these techniques, in particular the probabilistic assessment and the derivation of decision rules are still in their infancy. Further research is necessary and promising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1684-9981</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1561-8633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1684-9981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/nhess-9-1529-2009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Freshwater</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2009-08, Vol.9 (4), p.1529-1540</ispartof><rights>Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-9cb9feb8ab470f3eeb1400d7a32f0924310cf760040523e5db1ab5e9120dd85e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1027225145/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1027225145?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redetzky, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walther, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denhard, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfützner, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büttner, U.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions</title><title>Natural hazards and earth system sciences</title><description>Ensemble forecasts aim at framing the uncertainties of the potential future development of the hydro-meteorological situation. A probabilistic evaluation can be used to communicate forecast uncertainty to decision makers. Here an operational system for ensemble based flood forecasting is presented, which combines forecasts from the European COSMO-LEPS, SRNWP-PEPS and COSMO-DE prediction systems. A multi-model lagged average super-ensemble is generated by recombining members from different runs of these meteorological forecast systems. A subset of the super-ensemble is selected based on a priori model weights, which are obtained from ensemble calibration. Flood forecasts are simulated by the conceptual rainfall-runoff-model ArcEGMO. Parameter uncertainty of the model is represented by a parameter ensemble, which is a priori generated from a comprehensive uncertainty analysis during model calibration. The use of a computationally efficient hydrological model within a flood management system allows us to compute the hydro-meteorological model chain for all members of the sub-ensemble. The model chain is not re-computed before new ensemble forecasts are available, but the probabilistic assessment of the output is updated when new information from deterministic short range forecasts or from assimilation of measured data becomes available. For hydraulic modelling, with the desired result of a probabilistic inundation map with high spatial resolution, a replacement model can help to overcome computational limitations. A prototype of the developed framework has been applied for a case study in the Mulde river basin. However these techniques, in particular the probabilistic assessment and the derivation of decision rules are still in their infancy. Further research is necessary and promising.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><issn>1684-9981</issn><issn>1561-8633</issn><issn>1684-9981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcuKFDEUhgtRcBx9AHcBwV3pyaW6Ku6GwcvAgBtdh1Ry0qatStqc9KLfwwc2NT2IuMohfP-XcP6ue83h3cC1ep9-IFGvez4I3QsA_aS74rtJ9VpP_Ok_8_PuBdEBQOhBwVX3-4aoJWPas1NyWKqNqUYkFhMLS86ehVzQWaq0TcyjixRzYqv92UIf2LHkmuv5iCwHZhPLRyy2NsIuj4LVJrvHFVNldKaKa3NX3G9UexUT4Tov2EToo9uS9LJ7FuxC-OrxvO6-f_r47fZLf__1893tzX3v1Khrr92sA86TndUIQSLOXAH40UoRQAslObgw7gAUDELi4Gdu5wE1F-D9NKC87u4uXp_twRxLXG05m2yjebjIZW9sqdEtaCTM2nEtPTitgvLTvEO3s2MYpfVay-Z6e3G1hfw6IVWzRnK4LDZhPpERMEkxTlMD3_wHHvKptHWR4SBGIQauhkbxC-VKJioY_n6Pg9kaNw-NG222xs3WuPwD3NakLw</recordid><startdate>20090831</startdate><enddate>20090831</enddate><creator>Dietrich, J.</creator><creator>Schumann, A. H.</creator><creator>Redetzky, M.</creator><creator>Walther, J.</creator><creator>Denhard, M.</creator><creator>Wang, Y.</creator><creator>Pfützner, B.</creator><creator>Büttner, U.</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090831</creationdate><title>Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions</title><author>Dietrich, J. ; Schumann, A. H. ; Redetzky, M. ; Walther, J. ; Denhard, M. ; Wang, Y. ; Pfützner, B. ; Büttner, U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-9cb9feb8ab470f3eeb1400d7a32f0924310cf760040523e5db1ab5e9120dd85e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redetzky, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walther, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denhard, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfützner, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büttner, U.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards and earth system sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dietrich, J.</au><au>Schumann, A. H.</au><au>Redetzky, M.</au><au>Walther, J.</au><au>Denhard, M.</au><au>Wang, Y.</au><au>Pfützner, B.</au><au>Büttner, U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards and earth system sciences</jtitle><date>2009-08-31</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1529</spage><epage>1540</epage><pages>1529-1540</pages><issn>1684-9981</issn><issn>1561-8633</issn><eissn>1684-9981</eissn><abstract>Ensemble forecasts aim at framing the uncertainties of the potential future development of the hydro-meteorological situation. A probabilistic evaluation can be used to communicate forecast uncertainty to decision makers. Here an operational system for ensemble based flood forecasting is presented, which combines forecasts from the European COSMO-LEPS, SRNWP-PEPS and COSMO-DE prediction systems. A multi-model lagged average super-ensemble is generated by recombining members from different runs of these meteorological forecast systems. A subset of the super-ensemble is selected based on a priori model weights, which are obtained from ensemble calibration. Flood forecasts are simulated by the conceptual rainfall-runoff-model ArcEGMO. Parameter uncertainty of the model is represented by a parameter ensemble, which is a priori generated from a comprehensive uncertainty analysis during model calibration. The use of a computationally efficient hydrological model within a flood management system allows us to compute the hydro-meteorological model chain for all members of the sub-ensemble. The model chain is not re-computed before new ensemble forecasts are available, but the probabilistic assessment of the output is updated when new information from deterministic short range forecasts or from assimilation of measured data becomes available. For hydraulic modelling, with the desired result of a probabilistic inundation map with high spatial resolution, a replacement model can help to overcome computational limitations. A prototype of the developed framework has been applied for a case study in the Mulde river basin. However these techniques, in particular the probabilistic assessment and the derivation of decision rules are still in their infancy. Further research is necessary and promising.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/nhess-9-1529-2009</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1684-9981
ispartof Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2009-08, Vol.9 (4), p.1529-1540
issn 1684-9981
1561-8633
1684-9981
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30b9c193d0c94f4d8b6ec6a7f73ad993
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); IngentaConnect Journals
subjects Freshwater
title Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20uncertainties%20in%20flood%20forecasts%20for%20decision%20making:%20prototype%20of%20an%20operational%20flood%20management%20system%20integrating%20ensemble%20predictions&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20and%20earth%20system%20sciences&rft.au=Dietrich,%20J.&rft.date=2009-08-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1529&rft.epage=1540&rft.pages=1529-1540&rft.issn=1684-9981&rft.eissn=1684-9981&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/nhess-9-1529-2009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2717179061%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-9cb9feb8ab470f3eeb1400d7a32f0924310cf760040523e5db1ab5e9120dd85e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027225145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true