Loading…
Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis
Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2020-11, Vol.21 (1), p.757-757, Article 757 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493 |
container_end_page | 757 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 757 |
container_title | BMC musculoskeletal disorders |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Kitcharanant, Nitchanant Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame Unnanuntana, Aasis |
description | Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis.
This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged > 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30e179e44b934f5c946c1fc604f8d6d5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A650489671</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_30e179e44b934f5c946c1fc604f8d6d5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A650489671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUltvFCEYnRiNrdU_4IMh8cWXqTDcX0yaxkuTJr6or4ThssvKDiswmvbXy-zW2jWGB-DjnAPf4XTdSwTPERLsbUGDkKiHA-wh5kL0t4-6U0Q46gfCyeMH65PuWSkbCBEXWD7tTjAeoEADPO3sNx2DDfUG6MmC7GLQY4jLPnlQ1w4UF32fdXUWeB0jyKF8Bz9mV2pI06RDdiBMIEXrMtB2jrWAX6GuQSrVpV3KqYTyvHvSuMW9uJvPuq8f3n-5_NRff_54dXlx3RvKcO3lqLnFXhhNkeTIUSGxN9AgI5nRgxmFsXjERoyUjXTUyFtrkdDUc2gHIvFZd3XQtUlv1C6Hrc43Kumg9oWUV0rnGkx0CkOHuHSEjBITT40kzCBvGCReWGZp03p30NrN49ZZ46aadTwSPT6Zwlqt0k_FGeeCwibw5k4gp71fahuKcTHqyaW5qIGwgUAh4AJ9_Q90k-Y8NasWFJKovZH-Ra10ayBMPrV7zSKqLhiFREjGUUOd_wfVhnXbYNLkfGj1I8JwIJj2VyU7f98jgmrJmTrkTLWcqX3O1G0jvXrozj3lT7Dwb4jVz08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461919345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant ; Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame ; Unnanuntana, Aasis</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant ; Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame ; Unnanuntana, Aasis</creatorcontrib><description>Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis.
This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged > 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p < 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936).
The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33208120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control ; Adults ; Aged ; Balance ; Bone density ; Bone mineral density ; Bone surgery ; Falls ; Falls (Accidents) ; Female ; Fractures ; Geriatric Assessment ; Health aspects ; Health risks ; Humans ; Male ; Mortality ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Older adults ; Older people ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnosis ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Patients ; Post-menopause ; Postural Balance ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Self-rated fall risk questionnaire ; Surgery ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Thailand ; Translations ; Validity</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-11, Vol.21 (1), p.757-757, Article 757</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5742-298X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677850/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2461919345?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unnanuntana, Aasis</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis.
This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged > 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p < 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936).
The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.</description><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Falls (Accidents)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Post-menopause</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Self-rated fall risk questionnaire</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUltvFCEYnRiNrdU_4IMh8cWXqTDcX0yaxkuTJr6or4ThssvKDiswmvbXy-zW2jWGB-DjnAPf4XTdSwTPERLsbUGDkKiHA-wh5kL0t4-6U0Q46gfCyeMH65PuWSkbCBEXWD7tTjAeoEADPO3sNx2DDfUG6MmC7GLQY4jLPnlQ1w4UF32fdXUWeB0jyKF8Bz9mV2pI06RDdiBMIEXrMtB2jrWAX6GuQSrVpV3KqYTyvHvSuMW9uJvPuq8f3n-5_NRff_54dXlx3RvKcO3lqLnFXhhNkeTIUSGxN9AgI5nRgxmFsXjERoyUjXTUyFtrkdDUc2gHIvFZd3XQtUlv1C6Hrc43Kumg9oWUV0rnGkx0CkOHuHSEjBITT40kzCBvGCReWGZp03p30NrN49ZZ46aadTwSPT6Zwlqt0k_FGeeCwibw5k4gp71fahuKcTHqyaW5qIGwgUAh4AJ9_Q90k-Y8NasWFJKovZH-Ra10ayBMPrV7zSKqLhiFREjGUUOd_wfVhnXbYNLkfGj1I8JwIJj2VyU7f98jgmrJmTrkTLWcqX3O1G0jvXrozj3lT7Dwb4jVz08</recordid><startdate>20201118</startdate><enddate>20201118</enddate><creator>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</creator><creator>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</creator><creator>Unnanuntana, Aasis</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-298X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201118</creationdate><title>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</title><author>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant ; Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame ; Unnanuntana, Aasis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Falls (Accidents)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Post-menopause</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Self-rated fall risk questionnaire</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unnanuntana, Aasis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</au><au>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</au><au>Unnanuntana, Aasis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2020-11-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>757</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>757-757</pages><artnum>757</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis.
This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged > 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p < 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936).
The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33208120</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-298X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2474 |
ispartof | BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-11, Vol.21 (1), p.757-757, Article 757 |
issn | 1471-2474 1471-2474 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30e179e44b934f5c946c1fc604f8d6d5 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Accidental Falls - prevention & control Adults Aged Balance Bone density Bone mineral density Bone surgery Falls Falls (Accidents) Female Fractures Geriatric Assessment Health aspects Health risks Humans Male Mortality Musculoskeletal diseases Older adults Older people Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - diagnosis Osteoporosis - epidemiology Patients Post-menopause Postural Balance Prospective Studies Questionnaires Reliability Reproducibility of Results Risk assessment Risk factors Self-rated fall risk questionnaire Surgery Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Thailand Translations Validity |
title | Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A04%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20self-rated%20fall%20risk%20questionnaire%20in%20older%20adults%20with%20osteoporosis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Kitcharanant,%20Nitchanant&rft.date=2020-11-18&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=757&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=757-757&rft.artnum=757&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA650489671%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461919345&rft_id=info:pmid/33208120&rft_galeid=A650489671&rfr_iscdi=true |