Loading…

Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis

Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2020-11, Vol.21 (1), p.757-757, Article 757
Main Authors: Kitcharanant, Nitchanant, Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame, Unnanuntana, Aasis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493
container_end_page 757
container_issue 1
container_start_page 757
container_title BMC musculoskeletal disorders
container_volume 21
creator Kitcharanant, Nitchanant
Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame
Unnanuntana, Aasis
description Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis. This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged > 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30e179e44b934f5c946c1fc604f8d6d5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A650489671</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_30e179e44b934f5c946c1fc604f8d6d5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A650489671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUltvFCEYnRiNrdU_4IMh8cWXqTDcX0yaxkuTJr6or4ThssvKDiswmvbXy-zW2jWGB-DjnAPf4XTdSwTPERLsbUGDkKiHA-wh5kL0t4-6U0Q46gfCyeMH65PuWSkbCBEXWD7tTjAeoEADPO3sNx2DDfUG6MmC7GLQY4jLPnlQ1w4UF32fdXUWeB0jyKF8Bz9mV2pI06RDdiBMIEXrMtB2jrWAX6GuQSrVpV3KqYTyvHvSuMW9uJvPuq8f3n-5_NRff_54dXlx3RvKcO3lqLnFXhhNkeTIUSGxN9AgI5nRgxmFsXjERoyUjXTUyFtrkdDUc2gHIvFZd3XQtUlv1C6Hrc43Kumg9oWUV0rnGkx0CkOHuHSEjBITT40kzCBvGCReWGZp03p30NrN49ZZ46aadTwSPT6Zwlqt0k_FGeeCwibw5k4gp71fahuKcTHqyaW5qIGwgUAh4AJ9_Q90k-Y8NasWFJKovZH-Ra10ayBMPrV7zSKqLhiFREjGUUOd_wfVhnXbYNLkfGj1I8JwIJj2VyU7f98jgmrJmTrkTLWcqX3O1G0jvXrozj3lT7Dwb4jVz08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461919345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant ; Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame ; Unnanuntana, Aasis</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant ; Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame ; Unnanuntana, Aasis</creatorcontrib><description>Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis. This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged &gt; 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p &lt; 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p &lt; 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936). The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33208120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention &amp; control ; Adults ; Aged ; Balance ; Bone density ; Bone mineral density ; Bone surgery ; Falls ; Falls (Accidents) ; Female ; Fractures ; Geriatric Assessment ; Health aspects ; Health risks ; Humans ; Male ; Mortality ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Older adults ; Older people ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnosis ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Patients ; Post-menopause ; Postural Balance ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Self-rated fall risk questionnaire ; Surgery ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Thailand ; Translations ; Validity</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-11, Vol.21 (1), p.757-757, Article 757</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5742-298X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677850/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2461919345?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unnanuntana, Aasis</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis. This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged &gt; 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p &lt; 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p &lt; 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936). The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.</description><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Falls (Accidents)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Post-menopause</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Self-rated fall risk questionnaire</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUltvFCEYnRiNrdU_4IMh8cWXqTDcX0yaxkuTJr6or4ThssvKDiswmvbXy-zW2jWGB-DjnAPf4XTdSwTPERLsbUGDkKiHA-wh5kL0t4-6U0Q46gfCyeMH65PuWSkbCBEXWD7tTjAeoEADPO3sNx2DDfUG6MmC7GLQY4jLPnlQ1w4UF32fdXUWeB0jyKF8Bz9mV2pI06RDdiBMIEXrMtB2jrWAX6GuQSrVpV3KqYTyvHvSuMW9uJvPuq8f3n-5_NRff_54dXlx3RvKcO3lqLnFXhhNkeTIUSGxN9AgI5nRgxmFsXjERoyUjXTUyFtrkdDUc2gHIvFZd3XQtUlv1C6Hrc43Kumg9oWUV0rnGkx0CkOHuHSEjBITT40kzCBvGCReWGZp03p30NrN49ZZ46aadTwSPT6Zwlqt0k_FGeeCwibw5k4gp71fahuKcTHqyaW5qIGwgUAh4AJ9_Q90k-Y8NasWFJKovZH-Ra10ayBMPrV7zSKqLhiFREjGUUOd_wfVhnXbYNLkfGj1I8JwIJj2VyU7f98jgmrJmTrkTLWcqX3O1G0jvXrozj3lT7Dwb4jVz08</recordid><startdate>20201118</startdate><enddate>20201118</enddate><creator>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</creator><creator>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</creator><creator>Unnanuntana, Aasis</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-298X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201118</creationdate><title>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</title><author>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant ; Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame ; Unnanuntana, Aasis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Falls (Accidents)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Post-menopause</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Self-rated fall risk questionnaire</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unnanuntana, Aasis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitcharanant, Nitchanant</au><au>Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame</au><au>Unnanuntana, Aasis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2020-11-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>757</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>757-757</pages><artnum>757</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis. This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged &gt; 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p &lt; 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p &lt; 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936). The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33208120</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-298X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2474
ispartof BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-11, Vol.21 (1), p.757-757, Article 757
issn 1471-2474
1471-2474
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_30e179e44b934f5c946c1fc604f8d6d5
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Accidental Falls - prevention & control
Adults
Aged
Balance
Bone density
Bone mineral density
Bone surgery
Falls
Falls (Accidents)
Female
Fractures
Geriatric Assessment
Health aspects
Health risks
Humans
Male
Mortality
Musculoskeletal diseases
Older adults
Older people
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - diagnosis
Osteoporosis - epidemiology
Patients
Post-menopause
Postural Balance
Prospective Studies
Questionnaires
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Self-rated fall risk questionnaire
Surgery
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thailand
Translations
Validity
title Validity and reliability of the self-rated fall risk questionnaire in older adults with osteoporosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A04%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20self-rated%20fall%20risk%20questionnaire%20in%20older%20adults%20with%20osteoporosis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Kitcharanant,%20Nitchanant&rft.date=2020-11-18&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=757&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=757-757&rft.artnum=757&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12891-020-03788-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA650489671%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-9ba7d3f8ca51971e5893fc0c1c96ca2cb8cd3b3c8b56b5ba1fddd18a5f70d2493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461919345&rft_id=info:pmid/33208120&rft_galeid=A650489671&rfr_iscdi=true