Loading…
Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being
Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other aff...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2018-04, Vol.9, p.562-562 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53 |
container_end_page | 562 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 562 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Korpela, Kalevi M Pasanen, Tytti Repo, Veera Hartig, Terry Staats, Henk Mason, Michael Alves, Susana Fornara, Ferdinando Marks, Tony Saini, Sunil Scopelliti, Massimiliano Soares, Ana L Stigsdotter, Ulrika K Ward Thompson, Catharine |
description | Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden (
= 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31069f2247d04278aaaf8a7cc493a79d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_31069f2247d04278aaaf8a7cc493a79d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2034290333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUtBCIVkvvnJCPHMjy_JE4viAtpUClSki00KPlOHbWq2y82Mmi_nu82VJ138XW88y88dMg9JbAkrFafnS79NAtKZB6CVBW9AU6J1XFCwKifvnsfoYuUtpALg4UgL5GZ1QKCrIsz5G6GvY-hmFrh1H3-HaMerSdtwkHh1fOWTPin7abej36MGA9tPhubX3Eq5SC8XM34Xs_rvHt1Gwy3O8tvrd9X3y2fujeoFdO98lePJ4L9Ovr1d3l9-Lmx7fry9VNYbiUYyFJ2ZScGiBtA1XDmWBcUiMaQZzjlgsqRClaK0QlGDO0gcYJSo2FWpiqLdkCXR9126A3ahf9VscHFbRXcyPETuk4etNbxQhU0lHKRQucilpr7WotTHbCtJBt1vpw1Ep_7W5qTtS--N-rWW2aFCs5ISLDPx3hGbu1rcmbjLo_YZ2-DH6turBXZf51zQ7e3z8KxPBnsmlUW59MXqEebJiSosA4lcByLRAcoSaGlKJ1T2MIqEMq1JwKdUiFmlORKe-e23si_M8A-wfMZ7R_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2034290333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Korpela, Kalevi M ; Pasanen, Tytti ; Repo, Veera ; Hartig, Terry ; Staats, Henk ; Mason, Michael ; Alves, Susana ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Marks, Tony ; Saini, Sunil ; Scopelliti, Massimiliano ; Soares, Ana L ; Stigsdotter, Ulrika K ; Ward Thompson, Catharine</creator><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Kalevi M ; Pasanen, Tytti ; Repo, Veera ; Hartig, Terry ; Staats, Henk ; Mason, Michael ; Alves, Susana ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Marks, Tony ; Saini, Sunil ; Scopelliti, Massimiliano ; Soares, Ana L ; Stigsdotter, Ulrika K ; Ward Thompson, Catharine</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden (
= 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29720955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>affect regulation ; coping strategy ; emotional well-being ; life satisfaction ; natural places ; perceived efficacy ; perceived health ; Psychology ; urban places</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2018-04, Vol.9, p.562-562</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Korpela, Pasanen, Repo, Hartig, Staats, Mason, Alves, Fornara, Marks, Saini, Scopelliti, Soares, Stigsdotter and Ward Thompson. 2018 Korpela, Pasanen, Repo, Hartig, Staats, Mason, Alves, Fornara, Marks, Saini, Scopelliti, Soares, Stigsdotter and Ward Thompson</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915835/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915835/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29720955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-354117$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Kalevi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasanen, Tytti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repo, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staats, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornara, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Ana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward Thompson, Catharine</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden (
= 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.</description><subject>affect regulation</subject><subject>coping strategy</subject><subject>emotional well-being</subject><subject>life satisfaction</subject><subject>natural places</subject><subject>perceived efficacy</subject><subject>perceived health</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>urban places</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUtBCIVkvvnJCPHMjy_JE4viAtpUClSki00KPlOHbWq2y82Mmi_nu82VJ138XW88y88dMg9JbAkrFafnS79NAtKZB6CVBW9AU6J1XFCwKifvnsfoYuUtpALg4UgL5GZ1QKCrIsz5G6GvY-hmFrh1H3-HaMerSdtwkHh1fOWTPin7abej36MGA9tPhubX3Eq5SC8XM34Xs_rvHt1Gwy3O8tvrd9X3y2fujeoFdO98lePJ4L9Ovr1d3l9-Lmx7fry9VNYbiUYyFJ2ZScGiBtA1XDmWBcUiMaQZzjlgsqRClaK0QlGDO0gcYJSo2FWpiqLdkCXR9126A3ahf9VscHFbRXcyPETuk4etNbxQhU0lHKRQucilpr7WotTHbCtJBt1vpw1Ep_7W5qTtS--N-rWW2aFCs5ISLDPx3hGbu1rcmbjLo_YZ2-DH6turBXZf51zQ7e3z8KxPBnsmlUW59MXqEebJiSosA4lcByLRAcoSaGlKJ1T2MIqEMq1JwKdUiFmlORKe-e23si_M8A-wfMZ7R_</recordid><startdate>20180418</startdate><enddate>20180418</enddate><creator>Korpela, Kalevi M</creator><creator>Pasanen, Tytti</creator><creator>Repo, Veera</creator><creator>Hartig, Terry</creator><creator>Staats, Henk</creator><creator>Mason, Michael</creator><creator>Alves, Susana</creator><creator>Fornara, Ferdinando</creator><creator>Marks, Tony</creator><creator>Saini, Sunil</creator><creator>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Soares, Ana L</creator><creator>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</creator><creator>Ward Thompson, Catharine</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180418</creationdate><title>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</title><author>Korpela, Kalevi M ; Pasanen, Tytti ; Repo, Veera ; Hartig, Terry ; Staats, Henk ; Mason, Michael ; Alves, Susana ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Marks, Tony ; Saini, Sunil ; Scopelliti, Massimiliano ; Soares, Ana L ; Stigsdotter, Ulrika K ; Ward Thompson, Catharine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>affect regulation</topic><topic>coping strategy</topic><topic>emotional well-being</topic><topic>life satisfaction</topic><topic>natural places</topic><topic>perceived efficacy</topic><topic>perceived health</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>urban places</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Kalevi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasanen, Tytti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repo, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staats, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornara, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Ana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward Thompson, Catharine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korpela, Kalevi M</au><au>Pasanen, Tytti</au><au>Repo, Veera</au><au>Hartig, Terry</au><au>Staats, Henk</au><au>Mason, Michael</au><au>Alves, Susana</au><au>Fornara, Ferdinando</au><au>Marks, Tony</au><au>Saini, Sunil</au><au>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</au><au>Soares, Ana L</au><au>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</au><au>Ward Thompson, Catharine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-04-18</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>562</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>562-562</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden (
= 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>29720955</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2018-04, Vol.9, p.562-562 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31069f2247d04278aaaf8a7cc493a79d |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | affect regulation coping strategy emotional well-being life satisfaction natural places perceived efficacy perceived health Psychology urban places |
title | Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Strategies%20of%20Affect%20Regulation%20and%20Their%20Associations%20With%20Subjective%20Well-Being&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Korpela,%20Kalevi%20M&rft.date=2018-04-18&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=562&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=562-562&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2034290333%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2034290333&rft_id=info:pmid/29720955&rfr_iscdi=true |