Loading…

Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being

Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other aff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2018-04, Vol.9, p.562-562
Main Authors: Korpela, Kalevi M, Pasanen, Tytti, Repo, Veera, Hartig, Terry, Staats, Henk, Mason, Michael, Alves, Susana, Fornara, Ferdinando, Marks, Tony, Saini, Sunil, Scopelliti, Massimiliano, Soares, Ana L, Stigsdotter, Ulrika K, Ward Thompson, Catharine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53
container_end_page 562
container_issue
container_start_page 562
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 9
creator Korpela, Kalevi M
Pasanen, Tytti
Repo, Veera
Hartig, Terry
Staats, Henk
Mason, Michael
Alves, Susana
Fornara, Ferdinando
Marks, Tony
Saini, Sunil
Scopelliti, Massimiliano
Soares, Ana L
Stigsdotter, Ulrika K
Ward Thompson, Catharine
description Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden ( = 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31069f2247d04278aaaf8a7cc493a79d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_31069f2247d04278aaaf8a7cc493a79d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2034290333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUtBCIVkvvnJCPHMjy_JE4viAtpUClSki00KPlOHbWq2y82Mmi_nu82VJ138XW88y88dMg9JbAkrFafnS79NAtKZB6CVBW9AU6J1XFCwKifvnsfoYuUtpALg4UgL5GZ1QKCrIsz5G6GvY-hmFrh1H3-HaMerSdtwkHh1fOWTPin7abej36MGA9tPhubX3Eq5SC8XM34Xs_rvHt1Gwy3O8tvrd9X3y2fujeoFdO98lePJ4L9Ovr1d3l9-Lmx7fry9VNYbiUYyFJ2ZScGiBtA1XDmWBcUiMaQZzjlgsqRClaK0QlGDO0gcYJSo2FWpiqLdkCXR9126A3ahf9VscHFbRXcyPETuk4etNbxQhU0lHKRQucilpr7WotTHbCtJBt1vpw1Ep_7W5qTtS--N-rWW2aFCs5ISLDPx3hGbu1rcmbjLo_YZ2-DH6turBXZf51zQ7e3z8KxPBnsmlUW59MXqEebJiSosA4lcByLRAcoSaGlKJ1T2MIqEMq1JwKdUiFmlORKe-e23si_M8A-wfMZ7R_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2034290333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Korpela, Kalevi M ; Pasanen, Tytti ; Repo, Veera ; Hartig, Terry ; Staats, Henk ; Mason, Michael ; Alves, Susana ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Marks, Tony ; Saini, Sunil ; Scopelliti, Massimiliano ; Soares, Ana L ; Stigsdotter, Ulrika K ; Ward Thompson, Catharine</creator><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Kalevi M ; Pasanen, Tytti ; Repo, Veera ; Hartig, Terry ; Staats, Henk ; Mason, Michael ; Alves, Susana ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Marks, Tony ; Saini, Sunil ; Scopelliti, Massimiliano ; Soares, Ana L ; Stigsdotter, Ulrika K ; Ward Thompson, Catharine</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden ( = 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29720955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>affect regulation ; coping strategy ; emotional well-being ; life satisfaction ; natural places ; perceived efficacy ; perceived health ; Psychology ; urban places</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2018-04, Vol.9, p.562-562</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Korpela, Pasanen, Repo, Hartig, Staats, Mason, Alves, Fornara, Marks, Saini, Scopelliti, Soares, Stigsdotter and Ward Thompson. 2018 Korpela, Pasanen, Repo, Hartig, Staats, Mason, Alves, Fornara, Marks, Saini, Scopelliti, Soares, Stigsdotter and Ward Thompson</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915835/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915835/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29720955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-354117$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Kalevi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasanen, Tytti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repo, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staats, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornara, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Ana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward Thompson, Catharine</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden ( = 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.</description><subject>affect regulation</subject><subject>coping strategy</subject><subject>emotional well-being</subject><subject>life satisfaction</subject><subject>natural places</subject><subject>perceived efficacy</subject><subject>perceived health</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>urban places</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUtBCIVkvvnJCPHMjy_JE4viAtpUClSki00KPlOHbWq2y82Mmi_nu82VJ138XW88y88dMg9JbAkrFafnS79NAtKZB6CVBW9AU6J1XFCwKifvnsfoYuUtpALg4UgL5GZ1QKCrIsz5G6GvY-hmFrh1H3-HaMerSdtwkHh1fOWTPin7abej36MGA9tPhubX3Eq5SC8XM34Xs_rvHt1Gwy3O8tvrd9X3y2fujeoFdO98lePJ4L9Ovr1d3l9-Lmx7fry9VNYbiUYyFJ2ZScGiBtA1XDmWBcUiMaQZzjlgsqRClaK0QlGDO0gcYJSo2FWpiqLdkCXR9126A3ahf9VscHFbRXcyPETuk4etNbxQhU0lHKRQucilpr7WotTHbCtJBt1vpw1Ep_7W5qTtS--N-rWW2aFCs5ISLDPx3hGbu1rcmbjLo_YZ2-DH6turBXZf51zQ7e3z8KxPBnsmlUW59MXqEebJiSosA4lcByLRAcoSaGlKJ1T2MIqEMq1JwKdUiFmlORKe-e23si_M8A-wfMZ7R_</recordid><startdate>20180418</startdate><enddate>20180418</enddate><creator>Korpela, Kalevi M</creator><creator>Pasanen, Tytti</creator><creator>Repo, Veera</creator><creator>Hartig, Terry</creator><creator>Staats, Henk</creator><creator>Mason, Michael</creator><creator>Alves, Susana</creator><creator>Fornara, Ferdinando</creator><creator>Marks, Tony</creator><creator>Saini, Sunil</creator><creator>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Soares, Ana L</creator><creator>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</creator><creator>Ward Thompson, Catharine</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180418</creationdate><title>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</title><author>Korpela, Kalevi M ; Pasanen, Tytti ; Repo, Veera ; Hartig, Terry ; Staats, Henk ; Mason, Michael ; Alves, Susana ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Marks, Tony ; Saini, Sunil ; Scopelliti, Massimiliano ; Soares, Ana L ; Stigsdotter, Ulrika K ; Ward Thompson, Catharine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>affect regulation</topic><topic>coping strategy</topic><topic>emotional well-being</topic><topic>life satisfaction</topic><topic>natural places</topic><topic>perceived efficacy</topic><topic>perceived health</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>urban places</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Kalevi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasanen, Tytti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repo, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staats, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornara, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Ana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward Thompson, Catharine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korpela, Kalevi M</au><au>Pasanen, Tytti</au><au>Repo, Veera</au><au>Hartig, Terry</au><au>Staats, Henk</au><au>Mason, Michael</au><au>Alves, Susana</au><au>Fornara, Ferdinando</au><au>Marks, Tony</au><au>Saini, Sunil</au><au>Scopelliti, Massimiliano</au><au>Soares, Ana L</au><au>Stigsdotter, Ulrika K</au><au>Ward Thompson, Catharine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-04-18</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>562</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>562-562</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Environmental strategies of affect regulation refer to the use of natural and urban socio-physical settings in the service of regulation. We investigated the perceived use and efficacy of environmental strategies for regulation of general affect and sadness, considering them in relation to other affect regulation strategies and to subjective well-being. Participants from Australia, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, India, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden ( = 507) evaluated the frequency of use and perceived efficacy of affect regulation strategies using a modified version of the Measure of Affect Regulation Styles (MARS). The internet survey also included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), emotional well-being items from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and a single-item measure of perceived general health. Environmental regulation formed a separate factor of affect regulation in the exploratory structural equation models (ESEM). Although no relations of environmental strategies with emotional well-being were found, both the perceived frequency of use and efficacy of environmental strategies were positively related to perceived health. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of environmental strategies was positively related to life satisfaction in regulating sadness. The results encourage more explicit treatment of environmental strategies in research on affect regulation.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>29720955</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2018-04, Vol.9, p.562-562
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31069f2247d04278aaaf8a7cc493a79d
source PubMed Central
subjects affect regulation
coping strategy
emotional well-being
life satisfaction
natural places
perceived efficacy
perceived health
Psychology
urban places
title Environmental Strategies of Affect Regulation and Their Associations With Subjective Well-Being
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Strategies%20of%20Affect%20Regulation%20and%20Their%20Associations%20With%20Subjective%20Well-Being&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Korpela,%20Kalevi%20M&rft.date=2018-04-18&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=562&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=562-562&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2034290333%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-915b542c01db06b4373492c7b71ff4e4727757de776733c2b0bf722ce087c6d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2034290333&rft_id=info:pmid/29720955&rfr_iscdi=true