Loading…
Using an ensemble machine learning model to delineate groundwater potential zones in desert fringes of East Esna-Idfu area, Nile valley, Upper Egypt
The effects of climate change and rapid population growth increase the demand for freshwater, particularly in arid and hyper-arid environments, considering that groundwater is an essential water resource in these regions. The main focus of this research was to generate a groundwater potential map in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geoscience letters 2023-02, Vol.10 (1), p.9-19, Article 9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3 |
container_end_page | 19 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Geoscience letters |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Morgan, Hesham Madani, Ahmed Hussien, Hussien M. Nassar, Tamer |
description | The effects of climate change and rapid population growth increase the demand for freshwater, particularly in arid and hyper-arid environments, considering that groundwater is an essential water resource in these regions. The main focus of this research was to generate a groundwater potential map in the Center Eastern Desert, Egypt, using a random forest classification machine learning model. Based on satellite data, geological maps and field survey, fifteen effective features influencing groundwater potentiality were created. These effective features include elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, terrain ruggedness index, curvature, lithology, lineament density, distance from major fractures, topographic wetness index, stream power index, drainage density, rainfall, as well as distance from rivers and channels, soil type and land use/land cover. Collinearity analysis was used for feature selection. A 100 dependent points (57 water points and 43 non-potential mountainous areas) were labeled and classified according to hydrogeological conditions in the three main aquifers (Basement, Nubian and Quaternary Aquifers) in the study area. The random forest algorithm was trained using (70%) of the dependent points. Then, it was validated using (30%) and the hyper-parameters were optimized. Groundwater potential map was predicted and classified as good (5.1%), moderate (0.1%), poor (4.2%) and non-potentiality (90.6%). Sensitivity (92%), F1-score (94%) and accuracy (97%) are validation methods used due to the imbalanced dataset problem. The most important effective features for groundwater potential map were determined based on the random forest and the receiver operating characteristics curve. Groundwater management sustainability was discussed based on the predicted groundwater potential map and aquifer conditions. Therefore, the random forest model is helpful for delineating groundwater potential zones and can be used in similar locations all over the world. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40562-023-00261-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313ba38a232b4c4ea7008017a6047786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_313ba38a232b4c4ea7008017a6047786</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2774722645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc2O1DAMrhBIrHb3BThF4roFx-lPekSrAUZasRfmHLmNO3TUSUqSAQ3PwQOTnSLgxMmW_f1Y_orilYQ3UurmbaygbrAEVCUANrLEZ8UVyq4pK-jw-T_9y-I2xgMASF0rqeVV8XMXJ7cX5AS7yMd-ZnGk4cvkWMxMwT0tj97yLJIXueQFJRb74E_Ofs9tEItP7NJEs_jhHUcxuQyMHJIYQ6bniR_FhmISm-io3NrxJCgw3YlPU7b7RvPM5zuxW5Ysttmfl3RTvBhpjnz7u14Xu_ebz_cfy4fHD9v7dw_lUGGXSh4s19o2PaBlaHuleiTWlqthHNu-qzW2re50MyB2ElplFVuABi2O0OteXRfbVdd6OpglTEcKZ-NpMpeBD3tDIU3DzEZJ1ZPShAr7aqiYWgANsqUGqmzSZK3Xq9YS_NcTx2QO_hRcPt_kK6oWsanqjMIVNQQfY-Dxj6sE8xSmWcM0OUxzCdNgJqmVFJfLQ8Nf6f-wfgG_wKJW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774722645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using an ensemble machine learning model to delineate groundwater potential zones in desert fringes of East Esna-Idfu area, Nile valley, Upper Egypt</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><creator>Morgan, Hesham ; Madani, Ahmed ; Hussien, Hussien M. ; Nassar, Tamer</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Hesham ; Madani, Ahmed ; Hussien, Hussien M. ; Nassar, Tamer</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of climate change and rapid population growth increase the demand for freshwater, particularly in arid and hyper-arid environments, considering that groundwater is an essential water resource in these regions. The main focus of this research was to generate a groundwater potential map in the Center Eastern Desert, Egypt, using a random forest classification machine learning model. Based on satellite data, geological maps and field survey, fifteen effective features influencing groundwater potentiality were created. These effective features include elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, terrain ruggedness index, curvature, lithology, lineament density, distance from major fractures, topographic wetness index, stream power index, drainage density, rainfall, as well as distance from rivers and channels, soil type and land use/land cover. Collinearity analysis was used for feature selection. A 100 dependent points (57 water points and 43 non-potential mountainous areas) were labeled and classified according to hydrogeological conditions in the three main aquifers (Basement, Nubian and Quaternary Aquifers) in the study area. The random forest algorithm was trained using (70%) of the dependent points. Then, it was validated using (30%) and the hyper-parameters were optimized. Groundwater potential map was predicted and classified as good (5.1%), moderate (0.1%), poor (4.2%) and non-potentiality (90.6%). Sensitivity (92%), F1-score (94%) and accuracy (97%) are validation methods used due to the imbalanced dataset problem. The most important effective features for groundwater potential map were determined based on the random forest and the receiver operating characteristics curve. Groundwater management sustainability was discussed based on the predicted groundwater potential map and aquifer conditions. Therefore, the random forest model is helpful for delineating groundwater potential zones and can be used in similar locations all over the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-4092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40562-023-00261-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aquifers ; Arid environments ; Arid zones ; Aridity ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Biogeosciences ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Collinearity ; Deserts ; Distance ; Drainage density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Fractures ; Freshwater ; Geological mapping ; Geological maps ; Geological surveys ; Geology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Groundwater ; Groundwater management ; Groundwater potential ; Groundwater potential map ; Hydrogeology ; Imbalanced dataset ; Inland water environment ; Land cover ; Land use ; Learning algorithms ; Lithology ; Machine learning ; Mountain regions ; Mountainous areas ; Oceanography ; Planetology ; Population growth ; Quaternary ; Rainfall ; Random forest ; Research Letter ; Rivers ; Ruggedness ; Soil types ; Sustainability ; Variable importance ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Geoscience letters, 2023-02, Vol.10 (1), p.9-19, Article 9</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4994-5983</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2774722645/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2774722645?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Hesham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madani, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, Hussien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Tamer</creatorcontrib><title>Using an ensemble machine learning model to delineate groundwater potential zones in desert fringes of East Esna-Idfu area, Nile valley, Upper Egypt</title><title>Geoscience letters</title><addtitle>Geosci. Lett</addtitle><description>The effects of climate change and rapid population growth increase the demand for freshwater, particularly in arid and hyper-arid environments, considering that groundwater is an essential water resource in these regions. The main focus of this research was to generate a groundwater potential map in the Center Eastern Desert, Egypt, using a random forest classification machine learning model. Based on satellite data, geological maps and field survey, fifteen effective features influencing groundwater potentiality were created. These effective features include elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, terrain ruggedness index, curvature, lithology, lineament density, distance from major fractures, topographic wetness index, stream power index, drainage density, rainfall, as well as distance from rivers and channels, soil type and land use/land cover. Collinearity analysis was used for feature selection. A 100 dependent points (57 water points and 43 non-potential mountainous areas) were labeled and classified according to hydrogeological conditions in the three main aquifers (Basement, Nubian and Quaternary Aquifers) in the study area. The random forest algorithm was trained using (70%) of the dependent points. Then, it was validated using (30%) and the hyper-parameters were optimized. Groundwater potential map was predicted and classified as good (5.1%), moderate (0.1%), poor (4.2%) and non-potentiality (90.6%). Sensitivity (92%), F1-score (94%) and accuracy (97%) are validation methods used due to the imbalanced dataset problem. The most important effective features for groundwater potential map were determined based on the random forest and the receiver operating characteristics curve. Groundwater management sustainability was discussed based on the predicted groundwater potential map and aquifer conditions. Therefore, the random forest model is helpful for delineating groundwater potential zones and can be used in similar locations all over the world.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Arid environments</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Collinearity</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Drainage density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geological mapping</subject><subject>Geological maps</subject><subject>Geological surveys</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Groundwater potential</subject><subject>Groundwater potential map</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Imbalanced dataset</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountainous areas</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Planetology</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Quaternary</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Random forest</subject><subject>Research Letter</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Ruggedness</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Variable importance</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>2196-4092</issn><issn>2196-4092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc2O1DAMrhBIrHb3BThF4roFx-lPekSrAUZasRfmHLmNO3TUSUqSAQ3PwQOTnSLgxMmW_f1Y_orilYQ3UurmbaygbrAEVCUANrLEZ8UVyq4pK-jw-T_9y-I2xgMASF0rqeVV8XMXJ7cX5AS7yMd-ZnGk4cvkWMxMwT0tj97yLJIXueQFJRb74E_Ofs9tEItP7NJEs_jhHUcxuQyMHJIYQ6bniR_FhmISm-io3NrxJCgw3YlPU7b7RvPM5zuxW5Ysttmfl3RTvBhpjnz7u14Xu_ebz_cfy4fHD9v7dw_lUGGXSh4s19o2PaBlaHuleiTWlqthHNu-qzW2re50MyB2ElplFVuABi2O0OteXRfbVdd6OpglTEcKZ-NpMpeBD3tDIU3DzEZJ1ZPShAr7aqiYWgANsqUGqmzSZK3Xq9YS_NcTx2QO_hRcPt_kK6oWsanqjMIVNQQfY-Dxj6sE8xSmWcM0OUxzCdNgJqmVFJfLQ8Nf6f-wfgG_wKJW</recordid><startdate>20230209</startdate><enddate>20230209</enddate><creator>Morgan, Hesham</creator><creator>Madani, Ahmed</creator><creator>Hussien, Hussien M.</creator><creator>Nassar, Tamer</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-5983</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230209</creationdate><title>Using an ensemble machine learning model to delineate groundwater potential zones in desert fringes of East Esna-Idfu area, Nile valley, Upper Egypt</title><author>Morgan, Hesham ; Madani, Ahmed ; Hussien, Hussien M. ; Nassar, Tamer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Arid environments</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Collinearity</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Drainage density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geological mapping</topic><topic>Geological maps</topic><topic>Geological surveys</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Groundwater potential</topic><topic>Groundwater potential map</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Imbalanced dataset</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountainous areas</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Planetology</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Quaternary</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Random forest</topic><topic>Research Letter</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Ruggedness</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Variable importance</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Hesham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madani, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, Hussien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Tamer</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geoscience letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Hesham</au><au>Madani, Ahmed</au><au>Hussien, Hussien M.</au><au>Nassar, Tamer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using an ensemble machine learning model to delineate groundwater potential zones in desert fringes of East Esna-Idfu area, Nile valley, Upper Egypt</atitle><jtitle>Geoscience letters</jtitle><stitle>Geosci. Lett</stitle><date>2023-02-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>9-19</pages><artnum>9</artnum><issn>2196-4092</issn><eissn>2196-4092</eissn><abstract>The effects of climate change and rapid population growth increase the demand for freshwater, particularly in arid and hyper-arid environments, considering that groundwater is an essential water resource in these regions. The main focus of this research was to generate a groundwater potential map in the Center Eastern Desert, Egypt, using a random forest classification machine learning model. Based on satellite data, geological maps and field survey, fifteen effective features influencing groundwater potentiality were created. These effective features include elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, terrain ruggedness index, curvature, lithology, lineament density, distance from major fractures, topographic wetness index, stream power index, drainage density, rainfall, as well as distance from rivers and channels, soil type and land use/land cover. Collinearity analysis was used for feature selection. A 100 dependent points (57 water points and 43 non-potential mountainous areas) were labeled and classified according to hydrogeological conditions in the three main aquifers (Basement, Nubian and Quaternary Aquifers) in the study area. The random forest algorithm was trained using (70%) of the dependent points. Then, it was validated using (30%) and the hyper-parameters were optimized. Groundwater potential map was predicted and classified as good (5.1%), moderate (0.1%), poor (4.2%) and non-potentiality (90.6%). Sensitivity (92%), F1-score (94%) and accuracy (97%) are validation methods used due to the imbalanced dataset problem. The most important effective features for groundwater potential map were determined based on the random forest and the receiver operating characteristics curve. Groundwater management sustainability was discussed based on the predicted groundwater potential map and aquifer conditions. Therefore, the random forest model is helpful for delineating groundwater potential zones and can be used in similar locations all over the world.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/s40562-023-00261-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-5983</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2196-4092 |
ispartof | Geoscience letters, 2023-02, Vol.10 (1), p.9-19, Article 9 |
issn | 2196-4092 2196-4092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313ba38a232b4c4ea7008017a6047786 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | Algorithms Aquifers Arid environments Arid zones Aridity Atmospheric Sciences Biogeosciences Climate change Climate effects Collinearity Deserts Distance Drainage density Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Fractures Freshwater Geological mapping Geological maps Geological surveys Geology Geophysics/Geodesy Groundwater Groundwater management Groundwater potential Groundwater potential map Hydrogeology Imbalanced dataset Inland water environment Land cover Land use Learning algorithms Lithology Machine learning Mountain regions Mountainous areas Oceanography Planetology Population growth Quaternary Rainfall Random forest Research Letter Rivers Ruggedness Soil types Sustainability Variable importance Water resources |
title | Using an ensemble machine learning model to delineate groundwater potential zones in desert fringes of East Esna-Idfu area, Nile valley, Upper Egypt |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20an%20ensemble%20machine%20learning%20model%20to%20delineate%20groundwater%20potential%20zones%20in%20desert%20fringes%20of%20East%20Esna-Idfu%20area,%20Nile%20valley,%20Upper%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=Geoscience%20letters&rft.au=Morgan,%20Hesham&rft.date=2023-02-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=9-19&rft.artnum=9&rft.issn=2196-4092&rft.eissn=2196-4092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40562-023-00261-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2774722645%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ecde58d6b02de07b33b2ae8de4cff7b9582778986c2291073d3ed0062d2f0b8b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774722645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |