Loading…
The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China
Xiang River Basin, Southern China. Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using stream...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hydrology. Regional studies 2022-06, Vol.41, p.101092, Article 101092 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101092 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology. Regional studies |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Ding, Jie Zhu, Qian |
description | Xiang River Basin, Southern China.
Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated.
GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance.
•GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313d2f35de8a40688e67b6019ec83eee</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214581822001057</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_313d2f35de8a40688e67b6019ec83eee</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2660982610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxk1poSHJC_SkYy-7leS1LUEvZemfQKCHpmcxHo1iGa_lSvKWfYy-cey4lJ5ymmGY7_cN8xXFO8H3gov6Q7-nPnZ7yaVcB1zLV8WVlOKwq5RQr__r3xa3KfWcc6EapWt-Vfx56IgB4hwBLyw4dpqH7FOYIxKjM0whRxjT5CNkH0Y2xWBnzInBaFnuyEcG0zR4hNYPPl-YH1nKkeDkhvCbJb_wNmU407LLBoiPxBAydica82r5I8wLKY7s2PkRboo3DoZEt3_rdfHzy-eH47fd_fevd8dP9zssmzLvdFlpoayGthK6EqrVSA7ag3PWNpXAprUVokBBSrSOY3Nw1CB3JVa6JcHL6-Ju49oAvZmiP0G8mADePA9CfDQQs8eBTClKK11ZWVJw4LVSVDdtzYUmVCURLaz3G2t5z6-ZUjYnn5CGAUYKczKyrrlWsn62ldsqxpBSJPfPWnCzxml6s8Zp1jjNFuci-riJaHnI2VM0CT2NSNZHwrxc7F-SPwG-Z60E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660982610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Ding, Jie ; Zhu, Qian</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Jie ; Zhu, Qian</creatorcontrib><description>Xiang River Basin, Southern China.
Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated.
GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance.
•GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-5818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-5818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>basins ; China ; Evapotranspiration ; GLDAS ; GLEAM ; MOD16 ; Multi-variable calibration ; Soil and Water Assessment Tool model ; spatial data ; stream flow ; SWAT ; uncertainty ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies, 2022-06, Vol.41, p.101092, Article 101092</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581822001057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qian</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</title><title>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies</title><description>Xiang River Basin, Southern China.
Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated.
GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance.
•GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.</description><subject>basins</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>GLDAS</subject><subject>GLEAM</subject><subject>MOD16</subject><subject>Multi-variable calibration</subject><subject>Soil and Water Assessment Tool model</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>stream flow</subject><subject>SWAT</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>2214-5818</issn><issn>2214-5818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxk1poSHJC_SkYy-7leS1LUEvZemfQKCHpmcxHo1iGa_lSvKWfYy-cey4lJ5ymmGY7_cN8xXFO8H3gov6Q7-nPnZ7yaVcB1zLV8WVlOKwq5RQr__r3xa3KfWcc6EapWt-Vfx56IgB4hwBLyw4dpqH7FOYIxKjM0whRxjT5CNkH0Y2xWBnzInBaFnuyEcG0zR4hNYPPl-YH1nKkeDkhvCbJb_wNmU407LLBoiPxBAydica82r5I8wLKY7s2PkRboo3DoZEt3_rdfHzy-eH47fd_fevd8dP9zssmzLvdFlpoayGthK6EqrVSA7ag3PWNpXAprUVokBBSrSOY3Nw1CB3JVa6JcHL6-Ju49oAvZmiP0G8mADePA9CfDQQs8eBTClKK11ZWVJw4LVSVDdtzYUmVCURLaz3G2t5z6-ZUjYnn5CGAUYKczKyrrlWsn62ldsqxpBSJPfPWnCzxml6s8Zp1jjNFuci-riJaHnI2VM0CT2NSNZHwrxc7F-SPwG-Z60E</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Ding, Jie</creator><creator>Zhu, Qian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</title><author>Ding, Jie ; Zhu, Qian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>basins</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>GLDAS</topic><topic>GLEAM</topic><topic>MOD16</topic><topic>Multi-variable calibration</topic><topic>Soil and Water Assessment Tool model</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>stream flow</topic><topic>SWAT</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Jie</au><au>Zhu, Qian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>101092</spage><pages>101092-</pages><artnum>101092</artnum><issn>2214-5818</issn><eissn>2214-5818</eissn><abstract>Xiang River Basin, Southern China.
Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated.
GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance.
•GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2214-5818 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology. Regional studies, 2022-06, Vol.41, p.101092, Article 101092 |
issn | 2214-5818 2214-5818 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313d2f35de8a40688e67b6019ec83eee |
source | ScienceDirect® |
subjects | basins China Evapotranspiration GLDAS GLEAM MOD16 Multi-variable calibration Soil and Water Assessment Tool model spatial data stream flow SWAT uncertainty watersheds |
title | The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A14%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20of%20multisource%20evapotranspiration%20products%20and%20their%20applicability%20in%20streamflow%20simulation%20over%20a%20large%20catchment%20of%20Southern%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology.%20Regional%20studies&rft.au=Ding,%20Jie&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=101092&rft.pages=101092-&rft.artnum=101092&rft.issn=2214-5818&rft.eissn=2214-5818&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2660982610%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660982610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |