Loading…

The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China

Xiang River Basin, Southern China. Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using stream...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology. Regional studies 2022-06, Vol.41, p.101092, Article 101092
Main Authors: Ding, Jie, Zhu, Qian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101092
container_title Journal of hydrology. Regional studies
container_volume 41
creator Ding, Jie
Zhu, Qian
description Xiang River Basin, Southern China. Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated. GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance. •GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313d2f35de8a40688e67b6019ec83eee</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214581822001057</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_313d2f35de8a40688e67b6019ec83eee</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2660982610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxk1poSHJC_SkYy-7leS1LUEvZemfQKCHpmcxHo1iGa_lSvKWfYy-cey4lJ5ymmGY7_cN8xXFO8H3gov6Q7-nPnZ7yaVcB1zLV8WVlOKwq5RQr__r3xa3KfWcc6EapWt-Vfx56IgB4hwBLyw4dpqH7FOYIxKjM0whRxjT5CNkH0Y2xWBnzInBaFnuyEcG0zR4hNYPPl-YH1nKkeDkhvCbJb_wNmU407LLBoiPxBAydica82r5I8wLKY7s2PkRboo3DoZEt3_rdfHzy-eH47fd_fevd8dP9zssmzLvdFlpoayGthK6EqrVSA7ag3PWNpXAprUVokBBSrSOY3Nw1CB3JVa6JcHL6-Ju49oAvZmiP0G8mADePA9CfDQQs8eBTClKK11ZWVJw4LVSVDdtzYUmVCURLaz3G2t5z6-ZUjYnn5CGAUYKczKyrrlWsn62ldsqxpBSJPfPWnCzxml6s8Zp1jjNFuci-riJaHnI2VM0CT2NSNZHwrxc7F-SPwG-Z60E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660982610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Ding, Jie ; Zhu, Qian</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Jie ; Zhu, Qian</creatorcontrib><description>Xiang River Basin, Southern China. Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated. GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance. •GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-5818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-5818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>basins ; China ; Evapotranspiration ; GLDAS ; GLEAM ; MOD16 ; Multi-variable calibration ; Soil and Water Assessment Tool model ; spatial data ; stream flow ; SWAT ; uncertainty ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies, 2022-06, Vol.41, p.101092, Article 101092</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581822001057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qian</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</title><title>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies</title><description>Xiang River Basin, Southern China. Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated. GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance. •GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.</description><subject>basins</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>GLDAS</subject><subject>GLEAM</subject><subject>MOD16</subject><subject>Multi-variable calibration</subject><subject>Soil and Water Assessment Tool model</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>stream flow</subject><subject>SWAT</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>2214-5818</issn><issn>2214-5818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxk1poSHJC_SkYy-7leS1LUEvZemfQKCHpmcxHo1iGa_lSvKWfYy-cey4lJ5ymmGY7_cN8xXFO8H3gov6Q7-nPnZ7yaVcB1zLV8WVlOKwq5RQr__r3xa3KfWcc6EapWt-Vfx56IgB4hwBLyw4dpqH7FOYIxKjM0whRxjT5CNkH0Y2xWBnzInBaFnuyEcG0zR4hNYPPl-YH1nKkeDkhvCbJb_wNmU407LLBoiPxBAydica82r5I8wLKY7s2PkRboo3DoZEt3_rdfHzy-eH47fd_fevd8dP9zssmzLvdFlpoayGthK6EqrVSA7ag3PWNpXAprUVokBBSrSOY3Nw1CB3JVa6JcHL6-Ju49oAvZmiP0G8mADePA9CfDQQs8eBTClKK11ZWVJw4LVSVDdtzYUmVCURLaz3G2t5z6-ZUjYnn5CGAUYKczKyrrlWsn62ldsqxpBSJPfPWnCzxml6s8Zp1jjNFuci-riJaHnI2VM0CT2NSNZHwrxc7F-SPwG-Z60E</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Ding, Jie</creator><creator>Zhu, Qian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</title><author>Ding, Jie ; Zhu, Qian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>basins</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>GLDAS</topic><topic>GLEAM</topic><topic>MOD16</topic><topic>Multi-variable calibration</topic><topic>Soil and Water Assessment Tool model</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>stream flow</topic><topic>SWAT</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Jie</au><au>Zhu, Qian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology. Regional studies</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>101092</spage><pages>101092-</pages><artnum>101092</artnum><issn>2214-5818</issn><eissn>2214-5818</eissn><abstract>Xiang River Basin, Southern China. Multisource ET products, namely MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, are evaluated for their accuracy. Furthermore, to investigate the applicability of multisource ET products in streamflow simulation, the SWAT model is calibrated with three strategies: calibration using streamflow observations (Strategy I), calibration using multisource ET (Strategy II) and calibration by incorporating them (Strategy III). Moreover, the impact of using multisource ET products at subbasin level on streamflow simulation is also investigated. GLEAM tends to have the least relative uncertainty in the basin and perform the best in the comparison with CR-ET and water-balance derived ET as benchmark. Overall, Multisource ET products are alternative variables for streamflow simulation in this basin. The NSE of the simulated streamflow can reach 0.73, 0.70, 0.68 in the validation period based on calibration Strategy II with MOD16, GLEAM and GLDAS, respectively, which are slightly poorer than that based on Strategy I but still good. And the collocation of streamflow observations and GLEAM performs relatively better in Strategy III according to the three selected evaluation indices (NSE, BIAS and KGE). It should be noted that when taking the spatial information of ET products into parameter calibration, the differences of the streamflow simulation performances in the calibration and validation periods can be effectively reduced, indicating its robust performance. •GLEAM performs the best in the evaluation, followed by MOD16 and GLDAS.•Multisource ET products in calibration produce reliable streamflow simulations.•The spatial features of multisource ET products bring stable simulated streamflow.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2214-5818
ispartof Journal of hydrology. Regional studies, 2022-06, Vol.41, p.101092, Article 101092
issn 2214-5818
2214-5818
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313d2f35de8a40688e67b6019ec83eee
source ScienceDirect®
subjects basins
China
Evapotranspiration
GLDAS
GLEAM
MOD16
Multi-variable calibration
Soil and Water Assessment Tool model
spatial data
stream flow
SWAT
uncertainty
watersheds
title The accuracy of multisource evapotranspiration products and their applicability in streamflow simulation over a large catchment of Southern China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A14%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20of%20multisource%20evapotranspiration%20products%20and%20their%20applicability%20in%20streamflow%20simulation%20over%20a%20large%20catchment%20of%20Southern%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology.%20Regional%20studies&rft.au=Ding,%20Jie&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=101092&rft.pages=101092-&rft.artnum=101092&rft.issn=2214-5818&rft.eissn=2214-5818&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2660982610%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-935918d9ab519518b9cefab4ffdd751c7bd5cc1c1e81bf0c74fe7c0f3c59be103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660982610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true