Comparing Amazon Mechanical Turk with unpaid internet resources in online clinical trials

• Published in: Internet interventions : the application of information technology in mental and behavioural health 2018-06, Vol.12, p.68-73
• Main Authors: Bunge, Eduardo, Cook, Haley M., Bond, Melissa, Williamson, Rachel E., Cano, Monique, Barrera, Alinne Z., Leykin, Yan, Muñoz, Ricardo F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amazon Mechanical Turk; Clinical trials; Depression; Full length; Internet interventions; Recruitment
• ISSN: 2214-7829; 2214-7829
• DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.04.001

Internet interventions face significant challenges in recruitment and attrition rates are typically high and problematic. Finding innovative yet scientifically valid avenues for attaining and retaining participants is therefore of considerable importance. The main goal of this study was to compare recruitment process and participants characteristics between two similar randomized control trials of mood management interventions. One of the trials (Bunge et al., 2016) was conducted with participants recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (AMT), and the other trial recruited via Unpaid Internet Resources (UIR). The AMT sample (Bunge et al., 2016) consisted of 765 adults, and the UIR sample (recruited specifically for this study) consisted of 329 adult US residents. Participants' levels of depression, anxiety, confidence, motivation, and perceived usefulness of the intervention were assessed. The AMT sample was financially compensated whereas the UIR was not. AMT yielded higher recruitment rates per month (p