DH82 Canine and RAW264.7 Murine Macrophage Cell Lines Display Distinct Activation Profiles Upon Interaction With Leishmania infantum and Leishmania amazonensis

• Published in: Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 2020-06, Vol.10, p.247-247
• Main Authors: Nadaes, Natalia Rocha, Silva da Costa, Leandro, Santana, Raissa Couto, LaRocque-de-Freitas, Isabel Ferreira, Vivarini, Áislan de Carvalho, Soares, Deivid Costa, Wardini, Amanda Brito, Gazos Lopes, Ulisses, Saraiva, Elvira M., Freire-de-Lima, Celio Geraldo, Decote-Ricardo, Debora, Pinto-da-Silva, Lucia Helena
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cellular and Infection Microbiology; cytokines; DH82 canine; Leishmania infection; macrophages; oxidative burst; RAW 264.7 murine
• ISSN: 2235-2988; 2235-2988
• DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00247

Leishmaniasis is an anthropozoonotic disease, and dogs are considered the main urban reservoir of the parasite. Macrophages, the target cells of Leishmania sp ., play an important role during infection. Although dogs have a major importance in the epidemiology of the disease, the majority of the current knowledge about Leishmania –macrophage interaction comes from murine experimental models. To assess whether the canine macrophage strain DH82 is an accurate model for the study of Leishmania interaction, we compared its infection by two species of Leishmania ( Leishmania infantum and L. amazonensis ) with the murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7). Our results demonstrated that L. amazonensis survival was around 40% at 24 h of infection inside both macrophage cell lines; however, a reduction of 4.3 times in L. amazonensis infection at 48 h post-infection in RAW 264.7 macrophages was observed. The survival index of L. infantum in DH82 canine macrophages was around 3 times higher than that in RAW264.7 murine cells at 24 and 48 h post-infection; however, at 48 h a reduction in both macrophages was observed. Surprisingly at 24 h post-infection, NO and ROS production by DH82 canine cells stimulated with LPS or menadione or during Leishmania infection was minor compared to murine RAW264.7. However, basal arginase activity was higher in DH82 cells when compared to murine RAW264.7 cells. Analysis of the cytokines showed that these macrophages present a different response profile. L. infantum induced IL-12, and L. amazonensis induced IL-10 in both cell lines. However, L. infantum and L. amazonensis also induced TGF-β in RAW 264.7. CD86 and MHC expression showed that L. amazonensis modulated them in both cell lines. Conversely, the parasite load profile did not show significant difference between both macrophage cell lines after 48 h of infection, which suggests that other mechanisms of Leishmania control could be involved in DH82 cells.