Greenhouse Gas Impact of Algal Bio-Crude Production for a Range of CO2 Supply Scenarios

• Published in: Applied sciences 2021-12, Vol.11 (24), p.11931
• Main Authors: Arora, Pratham, Chance, Ronald R., Hendrix, Howard, Realff, Matthew J., Thomas, Valerie M., Yuan, Yanhui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algae; bio-crude; Biodiesel fuels; Biofuels; Biomass; Carbon dioxide; catalytic hydrothermal gasification; direct air capture; Electricity; Emissions; Energy; Greenhouse effect; Greenhouse gases; hydrothermal liquefaction; Industrial plant emissions; life cycle analysis; Liquefaction; Liquid fuels; Natural gas; Power plants; Raw materials; Recycling; Simulation; Sustainability; Synthesis gas
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app112411931

Refined bio-crude production from hydrothermal liquefaction of algae holds the potential to replace fossil-based conventional liquid fuels. The microalgae act as natural carbon sequestrators by consuming CO2. However, this absorbed CO2 is released to the atmosphere during the combustion of the bio-crude. Thus, the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of refined bio-crude are linked to the production and supply of the materials involved and the process energy demands. One prominent raw material is CO2, which is the main source of carbon for algae and the subsequent products. The emissions associated with the supply of CO2 can have a considerable impact on the sustainability of the algae-based refined bio-crude production process. Furthermore, the diurnal algae growth cycle complicates the CO2 supply scenarios. Traditionally, studies have relied on CO2 supplied from existing power plants. However, there is potential for building natural gas or biomass-based power plants with the primary aim of supplying CO2 to the biorefinery. Alternately, a direct air capture (DAC) process can extract CO2 directly from the air. The life-cycle GHG emissions associated with the production of refined bio-crude through hydrothermal liquefaction of algae are presented in this study. Different CO2 supply scenarios, including existing fossil fuel power plants and purpose-built CO2 sources, are compared. The integration of the CO2 sources with the algal biorefinery is also presented. The CO2 supply from biomass-based power plants has the highest potential for GHG reduction, with a GHG footprint of −57 g CO2 eq./MJ refined bio-crude. The CO2 supply from the DAC process has a GHG footprint of 49 CO2 eq./MJ refined bio-crude, which is very similar to the scenario that considers the supply of CO2 from an existing conventional natural gas-based plant and takes credit for the carbon utilization.