Loading…

Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2022-08, Vol.12 (1), p.13889-13889, Article 13889
Main Authors: Jansen, Kai Tobias, Hetzel, Jürgen, Schulte, Carola, Düzenli, Nurgül, Fusco, Stefano, Zerabruck, Emanuel, Schmider, Eva, Malek, Nisar P., Königsrainer, Alfred, Stüker, Dietmar, Werner, Christoph R., Wichmann, Dörte
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3
container_end_page 13889
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13889
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 12
creator Jansen, Kai Tobias
Hetzel, Jürgen
Schulte, Carola
Düzenli, Nurgül
Fusco, Stefano
Zerabruck, Emanuel
Schmider, Eva
Malek, Nisar P.
Königsrainer, Alfred
Stüker, Dietmar
Werner, Christoph R.
Wichmann, Dörte
description Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction device can undergo endoluminal or intracavitary placement. Different open-pore suction devices are used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract defects. Comparative analyses for features and properties of these devices are still lacking. Eight different (six hand-made devices and two commercial devices) open-pore suction devices for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were used, amount fluid removed was evaluated. The evaluation parameters included the time to reach the target pressure, the time required to remove 100 ml of water, and the material resistance of the device. All open-pore suction devices are able to aspirate the target volume of fluids. The time to reach the target volume varied considerably. Target negative pressure was not achieved with all open-pore suction devices during the aspiration of fluids; however, there was no negative effect on suction efficiency. Of the measurement data, material resistance could be calculated for six open-pore elements. We present a simple experimental, nonphysiologically setup for open-pore suction devices used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. The expected quantity of fluids secreted into the treated organs should affect open-pore suction device for endoscopic negative pressure therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31ed2065d9a5423293d74c1cfb0369cd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_31ed2065d9a5423293d74c1cfb0369cd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2702715386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7CyxIZNwNc42SChcmmlSmxgbfnY49RHiR1s50h9BN4a9-SoUBZ449HMP5_Hv6ZpXhP8jmDWv8-ciKFvMaUtkRLjlj1rzinmoqWM0ud_xWfNZc57XI-gAyfDy-aMiUFyLOR58-uTdw4SBAMZ-YDctHqLEszxoCcUHbKnekFxgdAuMQGCCeaaycjFhCDYmE1cvEEBRl38AdCSIOe1KssdJL3cP5BriNZlgYRGnUuKPhTIxYf6TEnalFfNC6enDJen-6L58eXz96vr9vbb15urj7etEUSWlhJODOedxIPE1tnOSLyj3a4nkva9GFhvDeuNAyyppNRpLqyW3DIrQWoD7KK52bg26r1akp91uldRe3VMxDQqnYo3EyhGwFLcCTtowauVQ4VwQ4zbYdYNxlbWh421rLsZrKmmJD09gT6tBH-nxnhQdUwiBK6AtydAij_X6oeafTYwTTpAXLOiEjNef9aRKn3zj3Qf11TtO6qoJIL1XVXRTWVSzDmBexyGYPWwOGpbHFUXRx0XR7HaxLamXMVhhPQH_Z-u38N3xvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702715386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Jansen, Kai Tobias ; Hetzel, Jürgen ; Schulte, Carola ; Düzenli, Nurgül ; Fusco, Stefano ; Zerabruck, Emanuel ; Schmider, Eva ; Malek, Nisar P. ; Königsrainer, Alfred ; Stüker, Dietmar ; Werner, Christoph R. ; Wichmann, Dörte</creator><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Kai Tobias ; Hetzel, Jürgen ; Schulte, Carola ; Düzenli, Nurgül ; Fusco, Stefano ; Zerabruck, Emanuel ; Schmider, Eva ; Malek, Nisar P. ; Königsrainer, Alfred ; Stüker, Dietmar ; Werner, Christoph R. ; Wichmann, Dörte</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction device can undergo endoluminal or intracavitary placement. Different open-pore suction devices are used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract defects. Comparative analyses for features and properties of these devices are still lacking. Eight different (six hand-made devices and two commercial devices) open-pore suction devices for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were used, amount fluid removed was evaluated. The evaluation parameters included the time to reach the target pressure, the time required to remove 100 ml of water, and the material resistance of the device. All open-pore suction devices are able to aspirate the target volume of fluids. The time to reach the target volume varied considerably. Target negative pressure was not achieved with all open-pore suction devices during the aspiration of fluids; however, there was no negative effect on suction efficiency. Of the measurement data, material resistance could be calculated for six open-pore elements. We present a simple experimental, nonphysiologically setup for open-pore suction devices used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. The expected quantity of fluids secreted into the treated organs should affect open-pore suction device for endoscopic negative pressure therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35974057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/4020 ; 692/4020/1503/1476 ; 692/4020/2223 ; Comparative analysis ; Endoscopy ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Pressure ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2022-08, Vol.12 (1), p.13889-13889, Article 13889</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2702715386/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2702715386?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Kai Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetzel, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Düzenli, Nurgül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerabruck, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmider, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Nisar P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Königsrainer, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stüker, Dietmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Christoph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichmann, Dörte</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction device can undergo endoluminal or intracavitary placement. Different open-pore suction devices are used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract defects. Comparative analyses for features and properties of these devices are still lacking. Eight different (six hand-made devices and two commercial devices) open-pore suction devices for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were used, amount fluid removed was evaluated. The evaluation parameters included the time to reach the target pressure, the time required to remove 100 ml of water, and the material resistance of the device. All open-pore suction devices are able to aspirate the target volume of fluids. The time to reach the target volume varied considerably. Target negative pressure was not achieved with all open-pore suction devices during the aspiration of fluids; however, there was no negative effect on suction efficiency. Of the measurement data, material resistance could be calculated for six open-pore elements. We present a simple experimental, nonphysiologically setup for open-pore suction devices used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. The expected quantity of fluids secreted into the treated organs should affect open-pore suction device for endoscopic negative pressure therapy.</description><subject>692/4020</subject><subject>692/4020/1503/1476</subject><subject>692/4020/2223</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7CyxIZNwNc42SChcmmlSmxgbfnY49RHiR1s50h9BN4a9-SoUBZ449HMP5_Hv6ZpXhP8jmDWv8-ciKFvMaUtkRLjlj1rzinmoqWM0ud_xWfNZc57XI-gAyfDy-aMiUFyLOR58-uTdw4SBAMZ-YDctHqLEszxoCcUHbKnekFxgdAuMQGCCeaaycjFhCDYmE1cvEEBRl38AdCSIOe1KssdJL3cP5BriNZlgYRGnUuKPhTIxYf6TEnalFfNC6enDJen-6L58eXz96vr9vbb15urj7etEUSWlhJODOedxIPE1tnOSLyj3a4nkva9GFhvDeuNAyyppNRpLqyW3DIrQWoD7KK52bg26r1akp91uldRe3VMxDQqnYo3EyhGwFLcCTtowauVQ4VwQ4zbYdYNxlbWh421rLsZrKmmJD09gT6tBH-nxnhQdUwiBK6AtydAij_X6oeafTYwTTpAXLOiEjNef9aRKn3zj3Qf11TtO6qoJIL1XVXRTWVSzDmBexyGYPWwOGpbHFUXRx0XR7HaxLamXMVhhPQH_Z-u38N3xvQ</recordid><startdate>20220816</startdate><enddate>20220816</enddate><creator>Jansen, Kai Tobias</creator><creator>Hetzel, Jürgen</creator><creator>Schulte, Carola</creator><creator>Düzenli, Nurgül</creator><creator>Fusco, Stefano</creator><creator>Zerabruck, Emanuel</creator><creator>Schmider, Eva</creator><creator>Malek, Nisar P.</creator><creator>Königsrainer, Alfred</creator><creator>Stüker, Dietmar</creator><creator>Werner, Christoph R.</creator><creator>Wichmann, Dörte</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220816</creationdate><title>Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract</title><author>Jansen, Kai Tobias ; Hetzel, Jürgen ; Schulte, Carola ; Düzenli, Nurgül ; Fusco, Stefano ; Zerabruck, Emanuel ; Schmider, Eva ; Malek, Nisar P. ; Königsrainer, Alfred ; Stüker, Dietmar ; Werner, Christoph R. ; Wichmann, Dörte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>692/4020</topic><topic>692/4020/1503/1476</topic><topic>692/4020/2223</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Kai Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetzel, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Düzenli, Nurgül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerabruck, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmider, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Nisar P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Königsrainer, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stüker, Dietmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Christoph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichmann, Dörte</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, Kai Tobias</au><au>Hetzel, Jürgen</au><au>Schulte, Carola</au><au>Düzenli, Nurgül</au><au>Fusco, Stefano</au><au>Zerabruck, Emanuel</au><au>Schmider, Eva</au><au>Malek, Nisar P.</au><au>Königsrainer, Alfred</au><au>Stüker, Dietmar</au><au>Werner, Christoph R.</au><au>Wichmann, Dörte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><date>2022-08-16</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13889</spage><epage>13889</epage><pages>13889-13889</pages><artnum>13889</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction device can undergo endoluminal or intracavitary placement. Different open-pore suction devices are used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract defects. Comparative analyses for features and properties of these devices are still lacking. Eight different (six hand-made devices and two commercial devices) open-pore suction devices for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were used, amount fluid removed was evaluated. The evaluation parameters included the time to reach the target pressure, the time required to remove 100 ml of water, and the material resistance of the device. All open-pore suction devices are able to aspirate the target volume of fluids. The time to reach the target volume varied considerably. Target negative pressure was not achieved with all open-pore suction devices during the aspiration of fluids; however, there was no negative effect on suction efficiency. Of the measurement data, material resistance could be calculated for six open-pore elements. We present a simple experimental, nonphysiologically setup for open-pore suction devices used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. The expected quantity of fluids secreted into the treated organs should affect open-pore suction device for endoscopic negative pressure therapy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35974057</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2022-08, Vol.12 (1), p.13889-13889, Article 13889
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31ed2065d9a5423293d74c1cfb0369cd
source Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 692/4020
692/4020/1503/1476
692/4020/2223
Comparative analysis
Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal tract
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Pressure
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20fluid%20removal%20of%20different%20open-pore%20elements%20for%20endoscopic%20negative%20pressure%20therapy%20in%20the%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20tract&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Jansen,%20Kai%20Tobias&rft.date=2022-08-16&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13889&rft.epage=13889&rft.pages=13889-13889&rft.artnum=13889&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2702715386%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2141c44670970dfd6c70b26b8172885938dc38cfe072722fa45da74d3d7e7ace3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702715386&rft_id=info:pmid/35974057&rfr_iscdi=true