Contextual and socio-economic factors affected urban dwellers experiences of and vulnerability to ecosystem disservices

• Published in: Scientific African 2024-12, Vol.26, p.e02404, Article e02404
• Main Authors: Sinasson S, Koupamba G., Shackleton, Charlie M., Ruwanza, Sheunesu, Thondhlana, Gladman
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Environmental worldview; Nature nuisances; Perception; Risk; Socio-economic status; Urban greening
• ISSN: 2468-2276; 2468-2276
• DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02404

•Effects of socio-environmental profiles on vulnerability to urban EDS was assessed.•Allergies and competition by invasive plants not commonly mentioned nuisances.•Limited public green spaces visit, probable reason for high reported coping ability.•English, more educated and ecocentric people are more exposed but less vulnerable.•Having garden, upbringing, age and green space visit influence vulnerability to EDS. Peoples’ experiences of Ecosystem Disservices (EDS) are influenced by socio-economic and environmental characteristics, and this needs better understanding for informed planning and management of urban green infrastructure. The paper investigated the understudied area of how socio-economic and environmental factors influence people's experiences of EDS in urban green spaces, in four towns in South Africa. Employing a questionnaire survey, in 303 randomly selected households in three neighborhoods of different economic standing, alongside statistical analysis provided quantitative data on experiences and vulnerability to EDS. A list of reported EDS was compiled and the number of EDS/respondent was compared between towns, neighborhoods and places of experience, using Kruskal-Wallis test and nested ANOVAs. Respondents’ vulnerability to EDS was assessed by analyzing the magnitudes of experience and coping abilities. The influences of socio-economic and environmental characteristics on experiences of and vulnerability to EDS were assessed using PCAs. Twenty-three EDS were reported in total, with the highest numbers recorded in affluent areas and the lowest in the poorest areas. Irrespective of town and neighborhood, the reported EDS were mainly experienced in domestic gardens and surrounding streets. Consequently, only one EDS seems of high concern, while the others are of lower concern or well manageable by the respondents. Significant influences of socio-economic (education and income levels, source of income, upbringing, frequency of visits to green spaces (GS), length of residence in neighborhoods) and environmental (environmental worldview, garden ownership, membership to environmental NGO) characteristics were observed on the experiences and vulnerability to EDS. Therefore, such variations in and influences on peoples’ experiences and vulnerability to EDS should be considered for sustainable management of urban GS. Also, the creation of GS should be accompanied by actions to improve people relationships to nature as well as to ensure their mainte