Loading…

The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity

Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this populati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2023-02, Vol.14, p.1032876-1032876
Main Authors: Wu, Qianwen, Yang, Zhibing, Qiu, Rui, Cheng, Sizhe, Zhu, Xia, Han, Zheyi, Xiao, Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3
container_end_page 1032876
container_issue
container_start_page 1032876
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 14
creator Wu, Qianwen
Yang, Zhibing
Qiu, Rui
Cheng, Sizhe
Zhu, Xia
Han, Zheyi
Xiao, Wei
description Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this population, to date, none have focused on occupational stress. Hence, we developed the Military Occupational Stress Response Scale (MOSRS) to provide a tool to objectively measure soldiers' occupational stress responses. An initial pool of 27 items was assembled from the literature, existing instruments, and interviews with soldiers. Of those 27, 17 were included in the MOSRS. The scale was subsequently completed by soldiers from one military region, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus8.3 and IBM SPSS 28.0 software, respectively. A total of 847 officers and soldiers were selected for scale testing, and 670 subjects were retained after data cleaning and screening according to the set criteria. After performing the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test, principal components analysis (PCA) was appropriate. The PCA yielded a three-factor model (physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses) with the items and factors strongly correlated. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed loads ranging from between 0.499 and 0.878 for each item. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the MOSRS was between 0.710 and 0.900, and the Omega reliability was between 0.714 and 0.898, which were all higher than the critical standard value of 0.7, indicating that the scale has good reliability. Analysis of the discrimination validity of each dimension revealed that the scale has good discrimination validity. The MOSRS demonstrated sound psychometric characteristics with acceptable reliability and validity, suggesting that it could be used to assess occupational stress in military personnel.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32baf2b1f43d4c7582f8a598ca99150e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_32baf2b1f43d4c7582f8a598ca99150e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2783791187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaUKaP9BD8bGH7EZftqQeCiX9SCDQS0qPYqyPjYJsuZJ3Yf995Ow2JDpII828j2Z4EfpI8JoxqS79VPabNcWUrQlmVIruDTolXcdXBAv59kV8gs5LecB1cUwxpu_RCeuk4JKxU_T37t41Q4hhhrxvkjHbCeaQRohNmbMrpanblMbimmIgui_Nd7dzMU2DG-eLmowB-kW-v2hgtM0OYrD19gG98xCLOz-eZ-jPzx93V9er29-_bq6-3a4M7-S8kq1jtnZvJaFe9FJazjxvfU-x9NYxhzHpgCrAhAujVO85KCows9z0YBw7QzcHrk3woKcchjqHThD000PKGw15DiY6zWgPnvbE80UtWkm9hFZJA0qRFi-srwfWtO0HZ02dMEN8BX2dGcO93qSdVkpI3rUV8PkIyOnf1pVZD6EYFyOMLm2LpkIyoQiRopbSQ6nJqZTs_PM3BOvFYP1ksF4M1keDq-jTywafJf_tZI9X7qR-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2783791187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wu, Qianwen ; Yang, Zhibing ; Qiu, Rui ; Cheng, Sizhe ; Zhu, Xia ; Han, Zheyi ; Xiao, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qianwen ; Yang, Zhibing ; Qiu, Rui ; Cheng, Sizhe ; Zhu, Xia ; Han, Zheyi ; Xiao, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this population, to date, none have focused on occupational stress. Hence, we developed the Military Occupational Stress Response Scale (MOSRS) to provide a tool to objectively measure soldiers' occupational stress responses. An initial pool of 27 items was assembled from the literature, existing instruments, and interviews with soldiers. Of those 27, 17 were included in the MOSRS. The scale was subsequently completed by soldiers from one military region, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus8.3 and IBM SPSS 28.0 software, respectively. A total of 847 officers and soldiers were selected for scale testing, and 670 subjects were retained after data cleaning and screening according to the set criteria. After performing the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test, principal components analysis (PCA) was appropriate. The PCA yielded a three-factor model (physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses) with the items and factors strongly correlated. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed loads ranging from between 0.499 and 0.878 for each item. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the MOSRS was between 0.710 and 0.900, and the Omega reliability was between 0.714 and 0.898, which were all higher than the critical standard value of 0.7, indicating that the scale has good reliability. Analysis of the discrimination validity of each dimension revealed that the scale has good discrimination validity. The MOSRS demonstrated sound psychometric characteristics with acceptable reliability and validity, suggesting that it could be used to assess occupational stress in military personnel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36874833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>military personnel ; occupational stress ; Psychology ; reliability ; stress response ; validity</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2023-02, Vol.14, p.1032876-1032876</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Wu, Yang, Qiu, Cheng, Zhu, Han and Xiao.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Wu, Yang, Qiu, Cheng, Zhu, Han and Xiao. 2023 Wu, Yang, Qiu, Cheng, Zhu, Han and Xiao</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978465/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978465/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qianwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Sizhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Zheyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this population, to date, none have focused on occupational stress. Hence, we developed the Military Occupational Stress Response Scale (MOSRS) to provide a tool to objectively measure soldiers' occupational stress responses. An initial pool of 27 items was assembled from the literature, existing instruments, and interviews with soldiers. Of those 27, 17 were included in the MOSRS. The scale was subsequently completed by soldiers from one military region, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus8.3 and IBM SPSS 28.0 software, respectively. A total of 847 officers and soldiers were selected for scale testing, and 670 subjects were retained after data cleaning and screening according to the set criteria. After performing the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test, principal components analysis (PCA) was appropriate. The PCA yielded a three-factor model (physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses) with the items and factors strongly correlated. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed loads ranging from between 0.499 and 0.878 for each item. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the MOSRS was between 0.710 and 0.900, and the Omega reliability was between 0.714 and 0.898, which were all higher than the critical standard value of 0.7, indicating that the scale has good reliability. Analysis of the discrimination validity of each dimension revealed that the scale has good discrimination validity. The MOSRS demonstrated sound psychometric characteristics with acceptable reliability and validity, suggesting that it could be used to assess occupational stress in military personnel.</description><subject>military personnel</subject><subject>occupational stress</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>stress response</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaUKaP9BD8bGH7EZftqQeCiX9SCDQS0qPYqyPjYJsuZJ3Yf995Ow2JDpII828j2Z4EfpI8JoxqS79VPabNcWUrQlmVIruDTolXcdXBAv59kV8gs5LecB1cUwxpu_RCeuk4JKxU_T37t41Q4hhhrxvkjHbCeaQRohNmbMrpanblMbimmIgui_Nd7dzMU2DG-eLmowB-kW-v2hgtM0OYrD19gG98xCLOz-eZ-jPzx93V9er29-_bq6-3a4M7-S8kq1jtnZvJaFe9FJazjxvfU-x9NYxhzHpgCrAhAujVO85KCows9z0YBw7QzcHrk3woKcchjqHThD000PKGw15DiY6zWgPnvbE80UtWkm9hFZJA0qRFi-srwfWtO0HZ02dMEN8BX2dGcO93qSdVkpI3rUV8PkIyOnf1pVZD6EYFyOMLm2LpkIyoQiRopbSQ6nJqZTs_PM3BOvFYP1ksF4M1keDq-jTywafJf_tZI9X7qR-</recordid><startdate>20230216</startdate><enddate>20230216</enddate><creator>Wu, Qianwen</creator><creator>Yang, Zhibing</creator><creator>Qiu, Rui</creator><creator>Cheng, Sizhe</creator><creator>Zhu, Xia</creator><creator>Han, Zheyi</creator><creator>Xiao, Wei</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230216</creationdate><title>The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity</title><author>Wu, Qianwen ; Yang, Zhibing ; Qiu, Rui ; Cheng, Sizhe ; Zhu, Xia ; Han, Zheyi ; Xiao, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>military personnel</topic><topic>occupational stress</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>stress response</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qianwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Sizhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Zheyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Qianwen</au><au>Yang, Zhibing</au><au>Qiu, Rui</au><au>Cheng, Sizhe</au><au>Zhu, Xia</au><au>Han, Zheyi</au><au>Xiao, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-02-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>1032876</spage><epage>1032876</epage><pages>1032876-1032876</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this population, to date, none have focused on occupational stress. Hence, we developed the Military Occupational Stress Response Scale (MOSRS) to provide a tool to objectively measure soldiers' occupational stress responses. An initial pool of 27 items was assembled from the literature, existing instruments, and interviews with soldiers. Of those 27, 17 were included in the MOSRS. The scale was subsequently completed by soldiers from one military region, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus8.3 and IBM SPSS 28.0 software, respectively. A total of 847 officers and soldiers were selected for scale testing, and 670 subjects were retained after data cleaning and screening according to the set criteria. After performing the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test, principal components analysis (PCA) was appropriate. The PCA yielded a three-factor model (physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses) with the items and factors strongly correlated. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed loads ranging from between 0.499 and 0.878 for each item. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the MOSRS was between 0.710 and 0.900, and the Omega reliability was between 0.714 and 0.898, which were all higher than the critical standard value of 0.7, indicating that the scale has good reliability. Analysis of the discrimination validity of each dimension revealed that the scale has good discrimination validity. The MOSRS demonstrated sound psychometric characteristics with acceptable reliability and validity, suggesting that it could be used to assess occupational stress in military personnel.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>36874833</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2023-02, Vol.14, p.1032876-1032876
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32baf2b1f43d4c7582f8a598ca99150e
source PubMed Central
subjects military personnel
occupational stress
Psychology
reliability
stress response
validity
title The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20military%20occupational%20stress%20response%20scale:%20Development,%20reliability,%20and%20validity&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Wu,%20Qianwen&rft.date=2023-02-16&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=1032876&rft.epage=1032876&rft.pages=1032876-1032876&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2783791187%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-85e3d328d812f7b88d43f45fb208fde3e0016a29a0147c99bf4a92703d4cbace3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2783791187&rft_id=info:pmid/36874833&rfr_iscdi=true