Loading…

Relationships of shredders, leaf processing and organic matter along a canopy cover gradient in tropical streams

Terrestrial allochthonous organic matter represents a structuring element and an important source of energy and carbon to fauna in small forested streams. However, the role of this matter as a food resource for benthic macroinvertebrates, and consequently, for shredders and their performance in rive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of limnology 2018-01, Vol.77 (1), p.109-120
Main Authors: Aguiar, Anna C.F., Neres-Lima, Vinicius, Moulton, Timothy P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fe691902e1ca552d456028c9e834b837560848fa11b3334ce12ac6ad06aa4b3f3
cites
container_end_page 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 109
container_title Journal of limnology
container_volume 77
creator Aguiar, Anna C.F.
Neres-Lima, Vinicius
Moulton, Timothy P.
description Terrestrial allochthonous organic matter represents a structuring element and an important source of energy and carbon to fauna in small forested streams. However, the role of this matter as a food resource for benthic macroinvertebrates, and consequently, for shredders and their performance in riverine processes, is not clear in low-order tropical streams. Aiming to investigate the relationship between shredders and leaves, we analyzed along a gradient of 8-93% canopy cover biomass and abundance of shredders, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates of local leaves to verify if these parameters were related to shade conditions and to each other. Three hypotheses were tested: i) shredder biomass, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates are related to canopy cover and exhibit higher values in shaded sites; ii) shredder biomass is positively related to accumulated leaves and breakdown rates; and iii) due to the relatively large body size of the important shredders, the association of shredders with leaves and importance to leaf processing should be better expressed in terms of guild biomass than abundance. Shredder biomass varied between 846 and 1506 mg DM m‑2 and accumulated leaves varied between 479 and 1120 g AFDM m-2 across sites. Leaf breakdown rate (k), the only measured variable that varied significantly among sites, varied between -0.0015 and -0.0238 day-1. Neither shredder biomass nor leaf biomass were associated with the shading gradient.  On the other hand, shredder abundance and biomass, mainly represented by Triplectides (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae), was positively related to accumulated leaves within sites and to breakdown rates assessed by leaf packs. Leaf breakdown, as assessed by the experimental leaf packs, was associated with shredder biomass, but not with shredder abundance. This result suggests that macroinvertebrates are important for leaf detritus processing and that their biomass reflects their activity, presumably because it is related to their secondary production and perhaps non-consumptive action. Their activity was observed at the scale of leaf packs and not at the scale of variation in canopy cover because apparently canopy did not modulate availability of leaves, which were apparently not limiting to the shredders.   
doi_str_mv 10.4081/jlimnol.2017.1684
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32bba602a3764f76b580b046d3c46d77</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_32bba602a3764f76b580b046d3c46d77</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2417692243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fe691902e1ca552d456028c9e834b837560848fa11b3334ce12ac6ad06aa4b3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhgepoNX-AO8C3omzTXIySeayiLaCIBR7Hc5kMmuW2WSaRMF_b7a7eFW8ycfJw3s4T5rmgtGVoJp938x-G-K84pSpFZNaHDWnTHFotQT4Us-M922npDppvua8oVQAKHXaLL_djMXHkJ_9kkmcSH5ObhxdytdkdjiRJUXrcvZhTTCMJKY1Bm_JFktxieAcdw_EYojLG7HxtRbXCUfvQiE-kJLi4i3OJJfkcJvPm-MJ5-y-Hfaz5s_d7dPNr_bh8ef9zY-H1grKSzs52bOecscsdh0fRScp17Z3GsSgQdWrFnpCxgYAENYxjlbiSCWiGGCCs-Z-nztG3Jgl-S2mNxPRm3-FOobBVLydnQE-DFjjEZQUk5JDp-lAhRzB1kWpmnW1z1pw7ZZUbXwEHrybnXez817hywOc4t8Xl4vZxJcU6qyGC6Zkz3l1_xnFOAPgXU8rxfaUTTHn5KaPvoya3b__p_874syh2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417692243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationships of shredders, leaf processing and organic matter along a canopy cover gradient in tropical streams</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Aguiar, Anna C.F. ; Neres-Lima, Vinicius ; Moulton, Timothy P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, Anna C.F. ; Neres-Lima, Vinicius ; Moulton, Timothy P.</creatorcontrib><description>Terrestrial allochthonous organic matter represents a structuring element and an important source of energy and carbon to fauna in small forested streams. However, the role of this matter as a food resource for benthic macroinvertebrates, and consequently, for shredders and their performance in riverine processes, is not clear in low-order tropical streams. Aiming to investigate the relationship between shredders and leaves, we analyzed along a gradient of 8-93% canopy cover biomass and abundance of shredders, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates of local leaves to verify if these parameters were related to shade conditions and to each other. Three hypotheses were tested: i) shredder biomass, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates are related to canopy cover and exhibit higher values in shaded sites; ii) shredder biomass is positively related to accumulated leaves and breakdown rates; and iii) due to the relatively large body size of the important shredders, the association of shredders with leaves and importance to leaf processing should be better expressed in terms of guild biomass than abundance. Shredder biomass varied between 846 and 1506 mg DM m‑2 and accumulated leaves varied between 479 and 1120 g AFDM m-2 across sites. Leaf breakdown rate (k), the only measured variable that varied significantly among sites, varied between -0.0015 and -0.0238 day-1. Neither shredder biomass nor leaf biomass were associated with the shading gradient.  On the other hand, shredder abundance and biomass, mainly represented by Triplectides (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae), was positively related to accumulated leaves within sites and to breakdown rates assessed by leaf packs. Leaf breakdown, as assessed by the experimental leaf packs, was associated with shredder biomass, but not with shredder abundance. This result suggests that macroinvertebrates are important for leaf detritus processing and that their biomass reflects their activity, presumably because it is related to their secondary production and perhaps non-consumptive action. Their activity was observed at the scale of leaf packs and not at the scale of variation in canopy cover because apparently canopy did not modulate availability of leaves, which were apparently not limiting to the shredders.   </description><identifier>ISSN: 1129-5767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1723-8633</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2017.1684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pavia: PAGEPress Publications</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Allochthonous deposits ; Aquatic insects ; benthic macroinvertebrate ; Benthos ; Biomass ; Body size ; Canopies ; Canopy ; Detritus ; Food resources ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Freshwater organisms ; Headwater ; Herbivores ; leaf breakdown ; Leaf litter ; Leaves ; Macroinvertebrates ; Organic matter ; Rainforests ; Rivers ; Secondary production ; Shading ; Streams ; Terrestrial environments ; Triplectides ; Tropical climate ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>Journal of limnology, 2018-01, Vol.77 (1), p.109-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fe691902e1ca552d456028c9e834b837560848fa11b3334ce12ac6ad06aa4b3f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3802-3438 ; 0000-0001-8223-2582</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2417692243?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, Anna C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neres-Lima, Vinicius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulton, Timothy P.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationships of shredders, leaf processing and organic matter along a canopy cover gradient in tropical streams</title><title>Journal of limnology</title><description>Terrestrial allochthonous organic matter represents a structuring element and an important source of energy and carbon to fauna in small forested streams. However, the role of this matter as a food resource for benthic macroinvertebrates, and consequently, for shredders and their performance in riverine processes, is not clear in low-order tropical streams. Aiming to investigate the relationship between shredders and leaves, we analyzed along a gradient of 8-93% canopy cover biomass and abundance of shredders, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates of local leaves to verify if these parameters were related to shade conditions and to each other. Three hypotheses were tested: i) shredder biomass, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates are related to canopy cover and exhibit higher values in shaded sites; ii) shredder biomass is positively related to accumulated leaves and breakdown rates; and iii) due to the relatively large body size of the important shredders, the association of shredders with leaves and importance to leaf processing should be better expressed in terms of guild biomass than abundance. Shredder biomass varied between 846 and 1506 mg DM m‑2 and accumulated leaves varied between 479 and 1120 g AFDM m-2 across sites. Leaf breakdown rate (k), the only measured variable that varied significantly among sites, varied between -0.0015 and -0.0238 day-1. Neither shredder biomass nor leaf biomass were associated with the shading gradient.  On the other hand, shredder abundance and biomass, mainly represented by Triplectides (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae), was positively related to accumulated leaves within sites and to breakdown rates assessed by leaf packs. Leaf breakdown, as assessed by the experimental leaf packs, was associated with shredder biomass, but not with shredder abundance. This result suggests that macroinvertebrates are important for leaf detritus processing and that their biomass reflects their activity, presumably because it is related to their secondary production and perhaps non-consumptive action. Their activity was observed at the scale of leaf packs and not at the scale of variation in canopy cover because apparently canopy did not modulate availability of leaves, which were apparently not limiting to the shredders.   </description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Allochthonous deposits</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>benthic macroinvertebrate</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater organisms</subject><subject>Headwater</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>leaf breakdown</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Secondary production</subject><subject>Shading</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Triplectides</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>1129-5767</issn><issn>1723-8633</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhgepoNX-AO8C3omzTXIySeayiLaCIBR7Hc5kMmuW2WSaRMF_b7a7eFW8ycfJw3s4T5rmgtGVoJp938x-G-K84pSpFZNaHDWnTHFotQT4Us-M922npDppvua8oVQAKHXaLL_djMXHkJ_9kkmcSH5ObhxdytdkdjiRJUXrcvZhTTCMJKY1Bm_JFktxieAcdw_EYojLG7HxtRbXCUfvQiE-kJLi4i3OJJfkcJvPm-MJ5-y-Hfaz5s_d7dPNr_bh8ef9zY-H1grKSzs52bOecscsdh0fRScp17Z3GsSgQdWrFnpCxgYAENYxjlbiSCWiGGCCs-Z-nztG3Jgl-S2mNxPRm3-FOobBVLydnQE-DFjjEZQUk5JDp-lAhRzB1kWpmnW1z1pw7ZZUbXwEHrybnXez817hywOc4t8Xl4vZxJcU6qyGC6Zkz3l1_xnFOAPgXU8rxfaUTTHn5KaPvoya3b__p_874syh2A</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Aguiar, Anna C.F.</creator><creator>Neres-Lima, Vinicius</creator><creator>Moulton, Timothy P.</creator><general>PAGEPress Publications</general><general>PAGEPress Scientific Publications, Pavia, Italy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>67V</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-3438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8223-2582</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Relationships of shredders, leaf processing and organic matter along a canopy cover gradient in tropical streams</title><author>Aguiar, Anna C.F. ; Neres-Lima, Vinicius ; Moulton, Timothy P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fe691902e1ca552d456028c9e834b837560848fa11b3334ce12ac6ad06aa4b3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Allochthonous deposits</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>benthic macroinvertebrate</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater organisms</topic><topic>Headwater</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>leaf breakdown</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Secondary production</topic><topic>Shading</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Triplectides</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, Anna C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neres-Lima, Vinicius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulton, Timothy P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Pagepress</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of limnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguiar, Anna C.F.</au><au>Neres-Lima, Vinicius</au><au>Moulton, Timothy P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationships of shredders, leaf processing and organic matter along a canopy cover gradient in tropical streams</atitle><jtitle>Journal of limnology</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>109-120</pages><issn>1129-5767</issn><eissn>1723-8633</eissn><abstract>Terrestrial allochthonous organic matter represents a structuring element and an important source of energy and carbon to fauna in small forested streams. However, the role of this matter as a food resource for benthic macroinvertebrates, and consequently, for shredders and their performance in riverine processes, is not clear in low-order tropical streams. Aiming to investigate the relationship between shredders and leaves, we analyzed along a gradient of 8-93% canopy cover biomass and abundance of shredders, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates of local leaves to verify if these parameters were related to shade conditions and to each other. Three hypotheses were tested: i) shredder biomass, accumulated leaves and breakdown rates are related to canopy cover and exhibit higher values in shaded sites; ii) shredder biomass is positively related to accumulated leaves and breakdown rates; and iii) due to the relatively large body size of the important shredders, the association of shredders with leaves and importance to leaf processing should be better expressed in terms of guild biomass than abundance. Shredder biomass varied between 846 and 1506 mg DM m‑2 and accumulated leaves varied between 479 and 1120 g AFDM m-2 across sites. Leaf breakdown rate (k), the only measured variable that varied significantly among sites, varied between -0.0015 and -0.0238 day-1. Neither shredder biomass nor leaf biomass were associated with the shading gradient.  On the other hand, shredder abundance and biomass, mainly represented by Triplectides (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae), was positively related to accumulated leaves within sites and to breakdown rates assessed by leaf packs. Leaf breakdown, as assessed by the experimental leaf packs, was associated with shredder biomass, but not with shredder abundance. This result suggests that macroinvertebrates are important for leaf detritus processing and that their biomass reflects their activity, presumably because it is related to their secondary production and perhaps non-consumptive action. Their activity was observed at the scale of leaf packs and not at the scale of variation in canopy cover because apparently canopy did not modulate availability of leaves, which were apparently not limiting to the shredders.   </abstract><cop>Pavia</cop><pub>PAGEPress Publications</pub><doi>10.4081/jlimnol.2017.1684</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-3438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8223-2582</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1129-5767
ispartof Journal of limnology, 2018-01, Vol.77 (1), p.109-120
issn 1129-5767
1723-8633
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32bba602a3764f76b580b046d3c46d77
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abundance
Allochthonous deposits
Aquatic insects
benthic macroinvertebrate
Benthos
Biomass
Body size
Canopies
Canopy
Detritus
Food resources
Freshwater
Freshwater ecology
Freshwater organisms
Headwater
Herbivores
leaf breakdown
Leaf litter
Leaves
Macroinvertebrates
Organic matter
Rainforests
Rivers
Secondary production
Shading
Streams
Terrestrial environments
Triplectides
Tropical climate
Zoobenthos
title Relationships of shredders, leaf processing and organic matter along a canopy cover gradient in tropical streams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationships%20of%20shredders,%20leaf%20processing%20and%20organic%20matter%20along%20a%20canopy%20cover%20gradient%20in%20tropical%20streams&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20limnology&rft.au=Aguiar,%20Anna%20C.F.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=109-120&rft.issn=1129-5767&rft.eissn=1723-8633&rft_id=info:doi/10.4081/jlimnol.2017.1684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2417692243%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fe691902e1ca552d456028c9e834b837560848fa11b3334ce12ac6ad06aa4b3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417692243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true