Loading…
Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise
Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Languages (Basel) 2024-07, Vol.9 (7), p.252 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-8065c07161ea9ab394b304f1912d3208f5a9db3dab748d89cb7f2219d04f3b403 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 252 |
container_title | Languages (Basel) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Cowley, Stephen J. |
description | Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. Ecolinguistic analysis of languages, discourse and narratives can thus be enriched by tracing how practices inform languaging. In turning to epistemic agency, I emphasise the following: (1) building corpora popularia, organised bodies, in order to enhance life-sustaining relations; (2) illuminating life from the inside; and (3) developing bioecological awareness. I contend that, while all living beings use coordinative activities to bring forth what appears to us, humans also use wording types and practices. As we use the already known, languaging enables subjecthood, a person’s little worlds, and a group’s common realities. Hence, what appears as (and to) experience is made in languaging. When linked to normative concerns, the resulting middle worlds also offer means of putting knowledge to work. As in social epistemology, one might regard ‘wealth and well-being’ as a marker of public good. Yet, critical work shows, appeal to these values is anthropomorphic. In order to encompass nonhumans and the biogenic, one can reject market orientatation by tracing languaging, and knowing, back to living. In showing benefits of so doing, I contrast two evolving wording types. The case of growthism, I suggest, attests to praxis and contrasts starkly with the ideational value of life-sustaining relations. Yet, in both cases, languaging meshes practices, happenings and the effects of action. The move shows how one can challenge the hypostatisation of ideology by pursuing how epistemic agency can contribute to the future of evolution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/languages9070252 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32bc9b4684014f1299797f38802fa721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_32bc9b4684014f1299797f38802fa721</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3084914335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-8065c07161ea9ab394b304f1912d3208f5a9db3dab748d89cb7f2219d04f3b403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLxDAUhIMouOjePRY8SvUlL20SPMmy6sKKFwVvIUnT0qW2a9KC_nujFRFPb3h8zAxDyBmFS0QFV53pm8k0PioQwAp2QBaMsTLngr4c_tHHZBnjDgAY5YkUC3LxYCqftX22nS3avrnO1m7okpjaOLYuW7_vfRjb6E_JUW266Jc_94Q8366fVvf59vFus7rZ5g6RjbmEsnAgaEm9Ucai4haB11RRViEDWRdGVRYrYwWXlVTOipoxqqoEoeWAJ2Qz-1aD2el9aF9N-NCDafX3YwiNNqmQ67xGZp2yvJQcaIpgSgklapQSWG0Eo8nrfPbah-Ft8nHUu2EKfaqvESRXlCMWiYKZcmGIMfj6N5WC_lpY_18YPwG7W21c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084914335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cowley, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cowley, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. Ecolinguistic analysis of languages, discourse and narratives can thus be enriched by tracing how practices inform languaging. In turning to epistemic agency, I emphasise the following: (1) building corpora popularia, organised bodies, in order to enhance life-sustaining relations; (2) illuminating life from the inside; and (3) developing bioecological awareness. I contend that, while all living beings use coordinative activities to bring forth what appears to us, humans also use wording types and practices. As we use the already known, languaging enables subjecthood, a person’s little worlds, and a group’s common realities. Hence, what appears as (and to) experience is made in languaging. When linked to normative concerns, the resulting middle worlds also offer means of putting knowledge to work. As in social epistemology, one might regard ‘wealth and well-being’ as a marker of public good. Yet, critical work shows, appeal to these values is anthropomorphic. In order to encompass nonhumans and the biogenic, one can reject market orientatation by tracing languaging, and knowing, back to living. In showing benefits of so doing, I contrast two evolving wording types. The case of growthism, I suggest, attests to praxis and contrasts starkly with the ideational value of life-sustaining relations. Yet, in both cases, languaging meshes practices, happenings and the effects of action. The move shows how one can challenge the hypostatisation of ideology by pursuing how epistemic agency can contribute to the future of evolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2226-471X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2226-471X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/languages9070252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Discourse analysis ; distributed language ; Ecolinguistics ; expertise ; Language ; languaging ; Life ; Linguistics ; social epistemology ; Sociology ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Languages (Basel), 2024-07, Vol.9 (7), p.252</ispartof><rights>2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-8065c07161ea9ab394b304f1912d3208f5a9db3dab748d89cb7f2219d04f3b403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084914335/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084914335?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12830,21361,21373,25731,27321,27901,27902,31246,33588,33751,33888,36989,43709,43872,44566,74192,74383,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cowley, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise</title><title>Languages (Basel)</title><description>Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. Ecolinguistic analysis of languages, discourse and narratives can thus be enriched by tracing how practices inform languaging. In turning to epistemic agency, I emphasise the following: (1) building corpora popularia, organised bodies, in order to enhance life-sustaining relations; (2) illuminating life from the inside; and (3) developing bioecological awareness. I contend that, while all living beings use coordinative activities to bring forth what appears to us, humans also use wording types and practices. As we use the already known, languaging enables subjecthood, a person’s little worlds, and a group’s common realities. Hence, what appears as (and to) experience is made in languaging. When linked to normative concerns, the resulting middle worlds also offer means of putting knowledge to work. As in social epistemology, one might regard ‘wealth and well-being’ as a marker of public good. Yet, critical work shows, appeal to these values is anthropomorphic. In order to encompass nonhumans and the biogenic, one can reject market orientatation by tracing languaging, and knowing, back to living. In showing benefits of so doing, I contrast two evolving wording types. The case of growthism, I suggest, attests to praxis and contrasts starkly with the ideational value of life-sustaining relations. Yet, in both cases, languaging meshes practices, happenings and the effects of action. The move shows how one can challenge the hypostatisation of ideology by pursuing how epistemic agency can contribute to the future of evolution.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>distributed language</subject><subject>Ecolinguistics</subject><subject>expertise</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>languaging</subject><subject>Life</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>social epistemology</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>2226-471X</issn><issn>2226-471X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>CRLPW</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEFLxDAUhIMouOjePRY8SvUlL20SPMmy6sKKFwVvIUnT0qW2a9KC_nujFRFPb3h8zAxDyBmFS0QFV53pm8k0PioQwAp2QBaMsTLngr4c_tHHZBnjDgAY5YkUC3LxYCqftX22nS3avrnO1m7okpjaOLYuW7_vfRjb6E_JUW266Jc_94Q8366fVvf59vFus7rZ5g6RjbmEsnAgaEm9Ucai4haB11RRViEDWRdGVRYrYwWXlVTOipoxqqoEoeWAJ2Qz-1aD2el9aF9N-NCDafX3YwiNNqmQ67xGZp2yvJQcaIpgSgklapQSWG0Eo8nrfPbah-Ft8nHUu2EKfaqvESRXlCMWiYKZcmGIMfj6N5WC_lpY_18YPwG7W21c</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Cowley, Stephen J.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise</title><author>Cowley, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-8065c07161ea9ab394b304f1912d3208f5a9db3dab748d89cb7f2219d04f3b403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>distributed language</topic><topic>Ecolinguistics</topic><topic>expertise</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>languaging</topic><topic>Life</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>social epistemology</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cowley, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Languages (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cowley, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise</atitle><jtitle>Languages (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>252</spage><pages>252-</pages><issn>2226-471X</issn><eissn>2226-471X</eissn><abstract>Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. Ecolinguistic analysis of languages, discourse and narratives can thus be enriched by tracing how practices inform languaging. In turning to epistemic agency, I emphasise the following: (1) building corpora popularia, organised bodies, in order to enhance life-sustaining relations; (2) illuminating life from the inside; and (3) developing bioecological awareness. I contend that, while all living beings use coordinative activities to bring forth what appears to us, humans also use wording types and practices. As we use the already known, languaging enables subjecthood, a person’s little worlds, and a group’s common realities. Hence, what appears as (and to) experience is made in languaging. When linked to normative concerns, the resulting middle worlds also offer means of putting knowledge to work. As in social epistemology, one might regard ‘wealth and well-being’ as a marker of public good. Yet, critical work shows, appeal to these values is anthropomorphic. In order to encompass nonhumans and the biogenic, one can reject market orientatation by tracing languaging, and knowing, back to living. In showing benefits of so doing, I contrast two evolving wording types. The case of growthism, I suggest, attests to praxis and contrasts starkly with the ideational value of life-sustaining relations. Yet, in both cases, languaging meshes practices, happenings and the effects of action. The move shows how one can challenge the hypostatisation of ideology by pursuing how epistemic agency can contribute to the future of evolution.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/languages9070252</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2226-471X |
ispartof | Languages (Basel), 2024-07, Vol.9 (7), p.252 |
issn | 2226-471X 2226-471X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32bc9b4684014f1299797f38802fa721 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Anthropology Discourse analysis distributed language Ecolinguistics expertise Language languaging Life Linguistics social epistemology Sociology Well being |
title | Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Made%20in%20Languaging;%20Ecolinguistic%20Expertise&rft.jtitle=Languages%20(Basel)&rft.au=Cowley,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=252&rft.pages=252-&rft.issn=2226-471X&rft.eissn=2226-471X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/languages9070252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3084914335%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-8065c07161ea9ab394b304f1912d3208f5a9db3dab748d89cb7f2219d04f3b403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084914335&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |