Emerging priorities and concerns in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative and quantitative findings from a United States national survey

• Published in: Frontiers in public health 2024-06, Vol.12, p.1365657
• Main Authors: Schwartz, Carolyn E, Borowiec, Katrina, Waldman, Ariel H, Sutherland, Tai, Contreras, Briana, Abatan, Elizabeth, Huang, I-Chan, Rohde, Gudrun, Rapkin, Bruce D, Skolasky, Richard L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - psychology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; meaning; Middle Aged; Pandemics; priorities; Public Health; quality of life; Quality of Life - psychology; response shift; SARS-CoV-2; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States - epidemiology; values
• ISSN: 2296-2565; 2296-2565
• DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365657

The present study examines how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience affected values and priorities. This cross-sectional study collected data between January and April 2023, from 1,197 individuals who are chronically ill or part of a general population sample. Using open-ended prompts and closed-ended questions, we investigated individuals' perceptions about COVID-19-induced changes in what quality of life means to them, what and who are important, life focus, and changes in norms and stressors. Data analyses included content and psychometric analysis, leading to latent profile analysis (LPA) to characterize distinct groups, and analysis of variance and chi-squared to compare profile groups' demographic characteristics. About 75% of the study sample noted changes in values and/or priorities, particularly in the greater prominence of family and friends. LPA yielded a four-profile model that fit the data well. Profile 1 (Index group; 64% of the sample) had relatively average scores on all indicators. Profile 2 (COVID-Specific Health & Resignation to Isolation Attributable to COVID-19; 5%) represented COVID-19-specific preventive health behaviors along with noting the requisite isolation and disengagement entailed in the social distancing necessary for COVID-19 prevention. Profile 3 (High Stress, Low Trust; 25%) represented high multi-domain stress, with the most elevated scores both on focusing on being true to themselves and perceiving people to be increasingly uncivil. Profile 4 (Active in the World, Low Trust; 6%) was focused on returning to work and finding greater meaning in their activities. These groups differed on race, marital status, difficulty paying bills, employment status, number of times they reported having had COVID-19, number of COVID-19 boosters received, whether they had Long COVID, age, BMI, and number of comorbidities. Three years after the beginning of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, its subjective impact is notable on most study participants' conceptualization of quality of life, priorities, perspectives on social norms, and perceived stressors. The four profile groups reflected distinct ways of dealing with the long-term effects of COVID-19.