Evaluating the usefulness of alignment filtering methods to reduce the impact of errors on evolutionary inferences

• Published in: BMC ecology and evolution 2019-01, Vol.19 (1), p.21-21, Article 21
• Main Authors: Di Franco, Arnaud, Poujol, Raphaël, Baurain, Denis, Philippe, Hervé
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Alignment; Amino Acid Sequence; Amino acids; Analysis; Annotations; Bioinformatics; Computer programs; Computer science; Computer simulation; Conserved Sequence; Cyanobacteria; Data processing; Engineering, computing & technology; Environmental Sciences; Eukaryotes; Evolution; Evolution & development; Evolution, Molecular; Filtering software; Filtration; Genes; Genetics & genetic processes; Genomes; Génétique & processus génétiques; Inference; Ingénierie, informatique & technologie; Internet filtering software; Life Sciences; Low similarity segments; Markov chains; Markov processes; Methods; Molecular evolution; Multiple sequence alignment; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Positive selection; Primary sequence error; Profile hidden Markov models; Prokaryotes; Proteins; Quantitative Methods; Sampling error; Sciences du vivant; Sciences informatiques; Sequence Alignment; Software; Stochasticity; Vertebrates
• ISSN: 1471-2148; 1471-2148; 2730-7182
• DOI: 10.1186/s12862-019-1350-2

Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) are the starting point of molecular evolutionary analyses. Errors in MSAs generate a non-historical signal that can lead to incorrect inferences. Therefore, numerous efforts have been made to reduce the impact of alignment errors, by improving alignment algorithms and by developing methods to filter out poorly aligned regions. However, MSAs do not only contain alignment errors, but also primary sequence errors. Such errors may originate from sequencing errors, from assembly errors, or from erroneous structural annotations (such as incorrect intron/exon boundaries). Even though their existence is acknowledged, the impact of primary sequence errors on evolutionary inference is poorly characterized. In a first step to fill this gap, we have developed a program called HmmCleaner, which detects and eliminates these errors from MSAs. It uses profile hidden Markov models (pHMM) to identify sequence segments that poorly fit their MSA and selectively removes them. We assessed its performances using > 700 amino-acid MSAs from prokaryotes and eukaryotes, in which we introduced several types of simulated primary sequence errors. The sensitivity of HmmCleaner towards simulated primary sequence errors was > 95%. In a second step, we compared the impact of segment filtering software (HmmCleaner and PREQUAL) relative to commonly used block-filtering software (BMGE and TrimAI) on evolutionary analyses. Using real data from vertebrates, we observed that segment-filtering methods improve the quality of evolutionary inference more than the currently used block-filtering methods. The formers were especially effective at improving branch length inferences, and at reducing false positive rate during detection of positive selection. Segment filtering methods such as HmmCleaner accurately detect simulated primary sequence errors. Our results suggest that these errors are more detrimental than alignment errors. However, they also show that stochastic (sampling) error is predominant in single-gene evolutionary inferences. Therefore, we argue that MSA filtering should focus on segment instead of block removal and that more studies are required to find the optimal balance between accuracy improvement and stochastic error increase brought by data removal.