Loading…
Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective
Grounded on constructivism, mining a complex mix of social and cognitive interrelations is key to understanding collaborative discussion in online learning. A single examination of one of these factors tends to overlook the impact of the other factor on learning. In this paper, we innovatively const...
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational Technology & Society 2023-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1-15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Educational Technology & Society |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Liu, Zhi Zhang, Ning Peng, Xian Liu, Sannyuya Yang, Zongkai |
description | Grounded on constructivism, mining a complex mix of social and cognitive interrelations is key to understanding collaborative discussion in online learning. A single examination of one of these factors tends to overlook the impact of the other factor on learning. In this paper, we innovatively constructed a social-cognitive engagement setting to jointly characterize social and cognitive aspects. In the online discussion forum, this study jointly characterized students' social and cognitive aspects to investigate interactive patterns of different social-cognitive engagements and social-cognitive engagement evolution across four periods (i.e., creation, growth, maturity, and death). Multi-methods including social network analysis, content analysis, epistemic network analysis, and statistical analysis was applied in this study. The results showed that the interactive patterns of social-cognitive engagement were affected by both social network position and cognitive level. In particular, students' social network position was a vital indicator for the contributions to cognitive level of students, and cognitive level affected the related interactions to some extent. In addition, this study found a nonlinear evolutionary development of students' social-cognitive engagement. Furthermore, maturity is a critical period on which teachers should focus, as the co-occurrence of social-cognitive engagement reaches a maximum level in this period. Based on the results, this multi-perspective analysis including social and cognitive aspects can provide insightful methodological implications and practical suggestions for teachers in conducting in-depth interactive discussions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_337ff772494d4a90bb5f643da0e2c132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A734345356</galeid><airiti_id>P20221223002_N202301050032_00001</airiti_id><ericid>EJ1378437</ericid><jstor_id>48707963</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_337ff772494d4a90bb5f643da0e2c132</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A734345356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-9c2cb04eee5094e2274bcf843d0ca0b384a24cb08a11a142df98a4aa6e79df633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIJErhJ4BW4gA9bBh_7DrmFoUAQVVbKeVsTbyzK0eJHWwH0X-P26BWkZAP9nieea15PVX1jsFEANPs0-J2NeHAS2B495FdTACAPavOmBRdI1vOn5czU10jOqleVq9S2gBwkB2cVWaVDz35nD7Uq2Adbpt5GL3L7jfVCz_iSLuSrZ2vr_3Weaq_uGQPKbng0-d65uulzzRGzNSXCLd3yaX6hmLak70XeV29GHCb6M2__bz6-XVxO__eXF5_W85nlw1KyXOjLbdrkETUgpbEuZJrO0yl6MEirMVUIpeFmCJjyCTvBz1FidiR0v3QCXFeLY-6fcCN2Ue3w3hnAjrzcBHiaDBmZ7dkhFDDoBSXWvYSNazX7dCVlxCIWyZ40Xp_1NrH8OtAKZtNOMTSXDJcdQq0EFo_USMWUeeHkCPaXbHHzJSQQrai7Qo1-Q9VVk87Z4OnwZX7k4KLk4LCZPqTRyymm-Xq6pR9e2QpOvvY9OIHE6pYp57ym5RDfATkVIHSD6apYx5dLF_-1OZNGSfOeBkp4ObqOFvQAghu4H64xF-E7bxJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767093399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Liu, Zhi ; Zhang, Ning ; Peng, Xian ; Liu, Sannyuya ; Yang, Zongkai</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhi ; Zhang, Ning ; Peng, Xian ; Liu, Sannyuya ; Yang, Zongkai</creatorcontrib><description>Grounded on constructivism, mining a complex mix of social and cognitive interrelations is key to understanding collaborative discussion in online learning. A single examination of one of these factors tends to overlook the impact of the other factor on learning. In this paper, we innovatively constructed a social-cognitive engagement setting to jointly characterize social and cognitive aspects. In the online discussion forum, this study jointly characterized students' social and cognitive aspects to investigate interactive patterns of different social-cognitive engagements and social-cognitive engagement evolution across four periods (i.e., creation, growth, maturity, and death). Multi-methods including social network analysis, content analysis, epistemic network analysis, and statistical analysis was applied in this study. The results showed that the interactive patterns of social-cognitive engagement were affected by both social network position and cognitive level. In particular, students' social network position was a vital indicator for the contributions to cognitive level of students, and cognitive level affected the related interactions to some extent. In addition, this study found a nonlinear evolutionary development of students' social-cognitive engagement. Furthermore, maturity is a critical period on which teachers should focus, as the co-occurrence of social-cognitive engagement reaches a maximum level in this period. Based on the results, this multi-perspective analysis including social and cognitive aspects can provide insightful methodological implications and practical suggestions for teachers in conducting in-depth interactive discussions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1176-3647</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1436-4522</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-4522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palmerston North: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; Collaborative learning ; College students ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Constructivism (Learning) ; Cooperative Learning ; Distance learning ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; epistemic network analysis (ena) ; Foreign Countries ; Full Length Articles ; integrated analysis ; knowledge building ; Methods ; Network Analysis ; Online education ; Online instruction ; Social & emotional learning ; Social aspects ; Social Cognition ; Social learning ; Social network analysis ; social network analysis (sna) ; Social Networks ; social-cognitive engagement ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Development ; Student Participation ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Educational Technology & Society, 2023-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48707963$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767093399?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33877,37012,38516,43733,43880,43895,44590,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1378437$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sannyuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zongkai</creatorcontrib><title>Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective</title><title>Educational Technology & Society</title><description>Grounded on constructivism, mining a complex mix of social and cognitive interrelations is key to understanding collaborative discussion in online learning. A single examination of one of these factors tends to overlook the impact of the other factor on learning. In this paper, we innovatively constructed a social-cognitive engagement setting to jointly characterize social and cognitive aspects. In the online discussion forum, this study jointly characterized students' social and cognitive aspects to investigate interactive patterns of different social-cognitive engagements and social-cognitive engagement evolution across four periods (i.e., creation, growth, maturity, and death). Multi-methods including social network analysis, content analysis, epistemic network analysis, and statistical analysis was applied in this study. The results showed that the interactive patterns of social-cognitive engagement were affected by both social network position and cognitive level. In particular, students' social network position was a vital indicator for the contributions to cognitive level of students, and cognitive level affected the related interactions to some extent. In addition, this study found a nonlinear evolutionary development of students' social-cognitive engagement. Furthermore, maturity is a critical period on which teachers should focus, as the co-occurrence of social-cognitive engagement reaches a maximum level in this period. Based on the results, this multi-perspective analysis including social and cognitive aspects can provide insightful methodological implications and practical suggestions for teachers in conducting in-depth interactive discussions.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Constructivism (Learning)</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>epistemic network analysis (ena)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Full Length Articles</subject><subject>integrated analysis</subject><subject>knowledge building</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Network Analysis</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Social & emotional learning</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social learning</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>social network analysis (sna)</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>social-cognitive engagement</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Development</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1176-3647</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIJErhJ4BW4gA9bBh_7DrmFoUAQVVbKeVsTbyzK0eJHWwH0X-P26BWkZAP9nieea15PVX1jsFEANPs0-J2NeHAS2B495FdTACAPavOmBRdI1vOn5czU10jOqleVq9S2gBwkB2cVWaVDz35nD7Uq2Adbpt5GL3L7jfVCz_iSLuSrZ2vr_3Weaq_uGQPKbng0-d65uulzzRGzNSXCLd3yaX6hmLak70XeV29GHCb6M2__bz6-XVxO__eXF5_W85nlw1KyXOjLbdrkETUgpbEuZJrO0yl6MEirMVUIpeFmCJjyCTvBz1FidiR0v3QCXFeLY-6fcCN2Ue3w3hnAjrzcBHiaDBmZ7dkhFDDoBSXWvYSNazX7dCVlxCIWyZ40Xp_1NrH8OtAKZtNOMTSXDJcdQq0EFo_USMWUeeHkCPaXbHHzJSQQrai7Qo1-Q9VVk87Z4OnwZX7k4KLk4LCZPqTRyymm-Xq6pR9e2QpOvvY9OIHE6pYp57ym5RDfATkVIHSD6apYx5dLF_-1OZNGSfOeBkp4ObqOFvQAghu4H64xF-E7bxJ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Liu, Zhi</creator><creator>Zhang, Ning</creator><creator>Peng, Xian</creator><creator>Liu, Sannyuya</creator><creator>Yang, Zongkai</creator><general>International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</general><general>International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan</general><general>International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</general><scope>188</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective</title><author>Liu, Zhi ; Zhang, Ning ; Peng, Xian ; Liu, Sannyuya ; Yang, Zongkai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-9c2cb04eee5094e2274bcf843d0ca0b384a24cb08a11a142df98a4aa6e79df633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Constructivism (Learning)</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>epistemic network analysis (ena)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Full Length Articles</topic><topic>integrated analysis</topic><topic>knowledge building</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Network Analysis</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Social & emotional learning</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social learning</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>social network analysis (sna)</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>social-cognitive engagement</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Development</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sannyuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zongkai</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (CBCA)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Educational Technology & Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zhi</au><au>Zhang, Ning</au><au>Peng, Xian</au><au>Liu, Sannyuya</au><au>Yang, Zongkai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1378437</ericid><atitle>Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Educational Technology & Society</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>1176-3647</issn><issn>1436-4522</issn><eissn>1436-4522</eissn><abstract>Grounded on constructivism, mining a complex mix of social and cognitive interrelations is key to understanding collaborative discussion in online learning. A single examination of one of these factors tends to overlook the impact of the other factor on learning. In this paper, we innovatively constructed a social-cognitive engagement setting to jointly characterize social and cognitive aspects. In the online discussion forum, this study jointly characterized students' social and cognitive aspects to investigate interactive patterns of different social-cognitive engagements and social-cognitive engagement evolution across four periods (i.e., creation, growth, maturity, and death). Multi-methods including social network analysis, content analysis, epistemic network analysis, and statistical analysis was applied in this study. The results showed that the interactive patterns of social-cognitive engagement were affected by both social network position and cognitive level. In particular, students' social network position was a vital indicator for the contributions to cognitive level of students, and cognitive level affected the related interactions to some extent. In addition, this study found a nonlinear evolutionary development of students' social-cognitive engagement. Furthermore, maturity is a critical period on which teachers should focus, as the co-occurrence of social-cognitive engagement reaches a maximum level in this period. Based on the results, this multi-perspective analysis including social and cognitive aspects can provide insightful methodological implications and practical suggestions for teachers in conducting in-depth interactive discussions.</abstract><cop>Palmerston North</cop><pub>International Forum of Educational Technology & Society</pub><doi>10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0001</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1176-3647 |
ispartof | Educational Technology & Society, 2023-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1-15 |
issn | 1176-3647 1436-4522 1436-4522 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_337ff772494d4a90bb5f643da0e2c132 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ERIC; JSTOR; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Cognition & reasoning Collaborative learning College students Computer Assisted Instruction Computer Mediated Communication Constructivism (Learning) Cooperative Learning Distance learning Educational Technology Electronic Learning epistemic network analysis (ena) Foreign Countries Full Length Articles integrated analysis knowledge building Methods Network Analysis Online education Online instruction Social & emotional learning Social aspects Social Cognition Social learning Social network analysis social network analysis (sna) Social Networks social-cognitive engagement Statistical Analysis Student Development Student Participation Undergraduate Students |
title | Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students'%20Social-Cognitive%20Engagement%20in%20Online%20Discussions:%20An%20Integrated%20Analysis%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Educational%20Technology%20%EF%BC%86%20Society&rft.au=Liu,%20Zhi&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=1176-3647&rft.eissn=1436-4522&rft_id=info:doi/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0001&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA734345356%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-9c2cb04eee5094e2274bcf843d0ca0b384a24cb08a11a142df98a4aa6e79df633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767093399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A734345356&rft_airiti_id=P20221223002_N202301050032_00001&rft_ericid=EJ1378437&rft_jstor_id=48707963&rfr_iscdi=true |