Loading…
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without ( ) infection. We searched i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-05, Vol.17 (6), p.698 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fabff566bc2e8ba222fa1bea84126a301ed55ba4f68f4604a6c2afd7cb1f500b3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 698 |
container_title | Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ouyang, Mengling Zou, Shupeng Cheng, Qian Shi, Xuan Zhao, Yazheng Sun, Minghui |
description | Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without
(
) infection. We searched in PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (all years up to January 2024). Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were used to rank each intervention. Among 14,056 studies screened, 56 studies involving 9792 participants were analyzed. Vonoprazan demonstrated the best efficacy in ulcer healing rate and
eradication rate (SUCRA = 86.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Keverprazan ranked second in ulcer healing rates (SUCRA = 76.0%) and was more effective in pain remission rates (SUCRA = 91.7%). The risk of adverse events was low for keverprazan (SUCRA = 11.8%) and tegoprazan (SUCRA = 12.9%), and moderate risk for vonoprazan (SUCRA = 44.3%) was demonstrated. Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan exhibited a higher risk of drug-related adverse events (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60-2.89) and serious adverse events (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.11-4.42). Subgroup analysis on patients with
-positive peptic ulcers showed that vonoprazan was at the top of the SUCRA rankings, followed by keverprazan. Vonoprazan showed superior performance in peptic ulcers, especially for patients with
-positive peptic ulcers. However, the risk of adverse events associated with vonoprazan should be noted. Keverprazan has also shown good therapeutic outcomes and has performed better in terms of safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ph17060698 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_33b19b27523046b3962df13f8ae291a6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_33b19b27523046b3962df13f8ae291a6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3072812948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fabff566bc2e8ba222fa1bea84126a301ed55ba4f68f4604a6c2afd7cb1f500b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl1v0zAUhiMEYmNwww9AlrhBSBn-SNyEm6lUg1UaUDF2HR07x6u7JA6206q_kr9E2o6xcXUsv48fvbJOkrxm9FSIkn7ol2xCJZVl8SQ5ZhnP0oJnk6cPzkfJixBWlOYTlrHnyZEoSsGElMfJ75lre_AQ7RrJuTFWg94S6GpyBQbjljhDFi5CCHZo0x2M0e7hqbY1-dQ4fYs-kHU4JQvvouvIYmh7Mu-WVtnoxsg4TxbYR6vJdaPRk42NS-IO0w2RXGBjtVOg4xj228Z5O743qKN13UcyJVfbELGFneEHri1u9gW_Ydw4f0u-YoR02kGzDTa8TJ4ZaAK-upsnyfXn85-zi_Ty-5f5bHqZaiF5TA0oY3IpleZYKOCcG2AKocgYlyAowzrPFWRGFiaTNAOpOZh6ohUzOaVKnCTzg7d2sKp6b1vw28qBrfYXzt9U4MfCDVZCKFYqPsm5oJlUopS8NkyYApCXDOToOju4-kG1WGvsoofmkfRx0tlldePWFWOcyrygo-HdncG7XwOGWLU2aGwa6NANoRJ0wgvGy6wY0bf_oSs3-PH3DpTMx4476v2B0t6F4NHct2G02i1d9W_pRvjNw_736N8tE38Ay1zWug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072650468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ouyang, Mengling ; Zou, Shupeng ; Cheng, Qian ; Shi, Xuan ; Zhao, Yazheng ; Sun, Minghui</creator><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Mengling ; Zou, Shupeng ; Cheng, Qian ; Shi, Xuan ; Zhao, Yazheng ; Sun, Minghui</creatorcontrib><description>Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without
(
) infection. We searched in PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (all years up to January 2024). Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were used to rank each intervention. Among 14,056 studies screened, 56 studies involving 9792 participants were analyzed. Vonoprazan demonstrated the best efficacy in ulcer healing rate and
eradication rate (SUCRA = 86.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Keverprazan ranked second in ulcer healing rates (SUCRA = 76.0%) and was more effective in pain remission rates (SUCRA = 91.7%). The risk of adverse events was low for keverprazan (SUCRA = 11.8%) and tegoprazan (SUCRA = 12.9%), and moderate risk for vonoprazan (SUCRA = 44.3%) was demonstrated. Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan exhibited a higher risk of drug-related adverse events (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60-2.89) and serious adverse events (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.11-4.42). Subgroup analysis on patients with
-positive peptic ulcers showed that vonoprazan was at the top of the SUCRA rankings, followed by keverprazan. Vonoprazan showed superior performance in peptic ulcers, especially for patients with
-positive peptic ulcers. However, the risk of adverse events associated with vonoprazan should be noted. Keverprazan has also shown good therapeutic outcomes and has performed better in terms of safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ph17060698</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38931366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Acids ; Antibiotics ; Bias ; Disease ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Helicobacter pylori ; Infections ; Meta-analysis ; network meta-analysis ; peptic ulcer ; Potassium ; potassium-competitive acid blocker ; proton pump inhibitor ; Remission (Medicine) ; Systematic Review ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-05, Vol.17 (6), p.698</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fabff566bc2e8ba222fa1bea84126a301ed55ba4f68f4604a6c2afd7cb1f500b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072650468/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072650468?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38931366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Mengling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Shupeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yazheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Minghui</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><title>Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Pharmaceuticals (Basel)</addtitle><description>Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without
(
) infection. We searched in PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (all years up to January 2024). Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were used to rank each intervention. Among 14,056 studies screened, 56 studies involving 9792 participants were analyzed. Vonoprazan demonstrated the best efficacy in ulcer healing rate and
eradication rate (SUCRA = 86.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Keverprazan ranked second in ulcer healing rates (SUCRA = 76.0%) and was more effective in pain remission rates (SUCRA = 91.7%). The risk of adverse events was low for keverprazan (SUCRA = 11.8%) and tegoprazan (SUCRA = 12.9%), and moderate risk for vonoprazan (SUCRA = 44.3%) was demonstrated. Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan exhibited a higher risk of drug-related adverse events (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60-2.89) and serious adverse events (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.11-4.42). Subgroup analysis on patients with
-positive peptic ulcers showed that vonoprazan was at the top of the SUCRA rankings, followed by keverprazan. Vonoprazan showed superior performance in peptic ulcers, especially for patients with
-positive peptic ulcers. However, the risk of adverse events associated with vonoprazan should be noted. Keverprazan has also shown good therapeutic outcomes and has performed better in terms of safety.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>network meta-analysis</subject><subject>peptic ulcer</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>potassium-competitive acid blocker</subject><subject>proton pump inhibitor</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>1424-8247</issn><issn>1424-8247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl1v0zAUhiMEYmNwww9AlrhBSBn-SNyEm6lUg1UaUDF2HR07x6u7JA6206q_kr9E2o6xcXUsv48fvbJOkrxm9FSIkn7ol2xCJZVl8SQ5ZhnP0oJnk6cPzkfJixBWlOYTlrHnyZEoSsGElMfJ75lre_AQ7RrJuTFWg94S6GpyBQbjljhDFi5CCHZo0x2M0e7hqbY1-dQ4fYs-kHU4JQvvouvIYmh7Mu-WVtnoxsg4TxbYR6vJdaPRk42NS-IO0w2RXGBjtVOg4xj228Z5O743qKN13UcyJVfbELGFneEHri1u9gW_Ydw4f0u-YoR02kGzDTa8TJ4ZaAK-upsnyfXn85-zi_Ty-5f5bHqZaiF5TA0oY3IpleZYKOCcG2AKocgYlyAowzrPFWRGFiaTNAOpOZh6ohUzOaVKnCTzg7d2sKp6b1vw28qBrfYXzt9U4MfCDVZCKFYqPsm5oJlUopS8NkyYApCXDOToOju4-kG1WGvsoofmkfRx0tlldePWFWOcyrygo-HdncG7XwOGWLU2aGwa6NANoRJ0wgvGy6wY0bf_oSs3-PH3DpTMx4476v2B0t6F4NHct2G02i1d9W_pRvjNw_736N8tE38Ay1zWug</recordid><startdate>20240528</startdate><enddate>20240528</enddate><creator>Ouyang, Mengling</creator><creator>Zou, Shupeng</creator><creator>Cheng, Qian</creator><creator>Shi, Xuan</creator><creator>Zhao, Yazheng</creator><creator>Sun, Minghui</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240528</creationdate><title>Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><author>Ouyang, Mengling ; Zou, Shupeng ; Cheng, Qian ; Shi, Xuan ; Zhao, Yazheng ; Sun, Minghui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fabff566bc2e8ba222fa1bea84126a301ed55ba4f68f4604a6c2afd7cb1f500b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>network meta-analysis</topic><topic>peptic ulcer</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>potassium-competitive acid blocker</topic><topic>proton pump inhibitor</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Mengling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Shupeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yazheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Minghui</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ouyang, Mengling</au><au>Zou, Shupeng</au><au>Cheng, Qian</au><au>Shi, Xuan</au><au>Zhao, Yazheng</au><au>Sun, Minghui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmaceuticals (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-05-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>698</spage><pages>698-</pages><issn>1424-8247</issn><eissn>1424-8247</eissn><abstract>Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without
(
) infection. We searched in PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (all years up to January 2024). Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were used to rank each intervention. Among 14,056 studies screened, 56 studies involving 9792 participants were analyzed. Vonoprazan demonstrated the best efficacy in ulcer healing rate and
eradication rate (SUCRA = 86.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Keverprazan ranked second in ulcer healing rates (SUCRA = 76.0%) and was more effective in pain remission rates (SUCRA = 91.7%). The risk of adverse events was low for keverprazan (SUCRA = 11.8%) and tegoprazan (SUCRA = 12.9%), and moderate risk for vonoprazan (SUCRA = 44.3%) was demonstrated. Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan exhibited a higher risk of drug-related adverse events (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60-2.89) and serious adverse events (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.11-4.42). Subgroup analysis on patients with
-positive peptic ulcers showed that vonoprazan was at the top of the SUCRA rankings, followed by keverprazan. Vonoprazan showed superior performance in peptic ulcers, especially for patients with
-positive peptic ulcers. However, the risk of adverse events associated with vonoprazan should be noted. Keverprazan has also shown good therapeutic outcomes and has performed better in terms of safety.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38931366</pmid><doi>10.3390/ph17060698</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8247 |
ispartof | Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-05, Vol.17 (6), p.698 |
issn | 1424-8247 1424-8247 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_33b19b27523046b3962df13f8ae291a6 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Abdomen Acids Antibiotics Bias Disease Gastroesophageal reflux Helicobacter pylori Infections Meta-analysis network meta-analysis peptic ulcer Potassium potassium-competitive acid blocker proton pump inhibitor Remission (Medicine) Systematic Review Ulcers |
title | Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A20%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Potassium-Competitive%20Acid%20Blockers%20vs.%20Proton%20Pump%20Inhibitors%20for%20Peptic%20Ulcer%20with%20or%20without%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20Infection:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Network%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceuticals%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Ouyang,%20Mengling&rft.date=2024-05-28&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=698&rft.pages=698-&rft.issn=1424-8247&rft.eissn=1424-8247&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ph17060698&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3072812948%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fabff566bc2e8ba222fa1bea84126a301ed55ba4f68f4604a6c2afd7cb1f500b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072650468&rft_id=info:pmid/38931366&rfr_iscdi=true |