Taking Profound Offence Seriously: Freedom of Speech v. Human Dignity

This study discusses the issue of offence to sensibilities as possible grounds for limiting freedom of expression. This issue is constantly brought to the public agenda, as for example, in the limitation imposed in Israel on the playing of Richard Wagner’s music by Israeli orchestras. The proposed t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hate studies 2020-12, Vol.16 (1), p.1-11
Main Author: Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Book publishing
feinberg
freedom of expression
Freedom of speech
harm
Mediation
offence
skokie
wagner
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study discusses the issue of offence to sensibilities as possible grounds for limiting freedom of expression. This issue is constantly brought to the public agenda, as for example, in the limitation imposed in Israel on the playing of Richard Wagner’s music by Israeli orchestras. The proposed thesis is as follows: The Offence to Sensibilities Argument will take precedence over free expression only in cases where profound and direct damage is inflicted upon the sensibilities of individuals or a target group, undermining their dignity, especially when the speaker’s intentions are to offend the target individual/group under circumstances in which the individual or target group cannot avoid. In every case, it is incumbent upon those who wish to limit expression to examine the content of the expression and its manner, the duration and intensity of the expression, the frequency of the offence, the speaker’s intentions, the circumstances and the likely consequences of the offensive speech. Psychologists should be consulted concerning the severity of each offence.
ISSN:1540-2126
2169-7442
2169-7442
DOI:10.33972/jhs.152