Impact of LS Mutation on Pharmacokinetics of Preventive HIV Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies: A Cross-Protocol Analysis of 16 Clinical Trials in People without HIV

• Published in: Pharmaceutics 2024-05, Vol.16 (5), p.594
• Main Authors: Mayer, Bryan T, Zhang, Lily, deCamp, Allan C, Yu, Chenchen, Sato, Alicia, Angier, Heather, Seaton, Kelly E, Yates, Nicole, Ledgerwood, Julie E, Mayer, Kenneth, Caskey, Marina, Nussenzweig, Michel, Stephenson, Kathryn, Julg, Boris, Barouch, Dan H, Sobieszczyk, Magdalena E, Edupuganti, Srilatha, Kelley, Colleen F, McElrath, M Juliana, Gelderblom, Huub C, Pensiero, Michael, McDermott, Adrian, Gama, Lucio, Koup, Richard A, Gilbert, Peter B, Cohen, Myron S, Corey, Lawrence, Hyrien, Ollivier, Tomaras, Georgia D, Huang, Yunda
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antigenic determinants; Binding sites; Bioavailability; Clinical trials; Comparative analysis; Drug therapy; Genetic aspects; HIV; HIV (Viruses); HIV prevention; Human immunodeficiency virus; LS mutation; Monoclonal antibodies; Mutation; Parenting; Population; population pharmacokinetics modeling; Prevention; Software; targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE); two-compartment model; Vaccines
• ISSN: 1999-4923; 1999-4923
• DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050594

Monoclonal antibodies are commonly engineered with an introduction of Met428Leu and Asn434Ser, known as the LS mutation, in the fragment crystallizable region to improve pharmacokinetic profiles. The LS mutation delays antibody clearance by enhancing binding affinity to the neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor found on endothelial cells. To characterize the LS mutation for monoclonal antibodies targeting HIV, we compared pharmacokinetic parameters between parental versus LS variants for five pairs of anti-HIV immunoglobin G1 monoclonal antibodies (VRC01/LS/VRC07-523LS, 3BNC117/LS, PGDM1400/LS PGT121/LS, 10-1074/LS), analyzing data from 16 clinical trials of 583 participants without HIV. We described serum concentrations of these monoclonal antibodies following intravenous or subcutaneous administration by an open two-compartment disposition, with first-order elimination from the central compartment using non-linear mixed effects pharmacokinetic models. We compared estimated pharmacokinetic parameters using the targeted maximum likelihood estimation method, accounting for participant differences. We observed lower clearance rate, central volume, and peripheral volume of distribution for all LS variants compared to parental monoclonal antibodies. LS monoclonal antibodies showed several improvements in pharmacokinetic parameters, including increases in the elimination half-life by 2.7- to 4.1-fold, the dose-normalized area-under-the-curve by 4.1- to 9.5-fold, and the predicted concentration at 4 weeks post-administration by 3.4- to 7.6-fold. Results suggest a favorable pharmacokinetic profile of LS variants regardless of HIV epitope specificity. Insights support lower dosages and/or less frequent dosing of LS variants to achieve similar levels of antibody exposure in future clinical applications.