Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveShoulder pain, primarily due to rotator cuff tendinopathy, significantly impacts function and quality of life, with considerable socioeconomic implications. Physiotherapy myofascial trigger point therapy (MPT) is traditionally used, but therapeutic exercise (TE) has gained attention for its...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine 2024, Vol.10 (4), p.e002043
Main Authors: Villa Muñoz, Teresa, Velázquez Saornil, Jorge, Sánchez Milá, Zacarías, Romero-Morales, Carlos, Almazán Polo, Jaime, Baraja Vegas, Luis, Hugo-Villafañe, Jorge, Abuín-Porras, Vanesa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical medicine
Exercise
Intervention
Manipulative therapy
Original research
Pain
Patients
Physical therapy
Physiotherapy
Rotator cuff
Shoulder
Software
Statistical analysis
Stretching
Tendinopathy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveShoulder pain, primarily due to rotator cuff tendinopathy, significantly impacts function and quality of life, with considerable socioeconomic implications. Physiotherapy myofascial trigger point therapy (MPT) is traditionally used, but therapeutic exercise (TE) has gained attention for its potential administrative and implementation benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TE compared with MPT in treating shoulder tendinopathies.MethodsA single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted comparing TE and MPT. Outcome measures included pain intensity with the Numerical Rating Scale, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and range of motion (ROM), assessed before and after 10 treatment sessions. A total number of 72 participants (TE group n=36 age 49.22±15.29/MTP group n=36 age 49.03±19.12) participated in the study.InterventionsParticipants in both groups were evaluated before treatment and after 10 sessions. A total of 10 sessions were conducted over 5 weeks of intervention.ResultsBoth interventions showed improvements in pain intensity and ROM, with no significant differences between the groups in most measures except PPT, where TE demonstrated a greater decrease in pressure-induced pain.ConclusionTE could serve as an alternative to manual therapy, offering cost–benefit advantages, especially in administration via telecare and group sessions, highlighting its broader application in physiotherapy.Trial registration numberNCT06241404.
ISSN:2055-7647
2055-7647
DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002043