Loading…
Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?
Bumblebees ( ) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial...
Saved in:
Published in: | eLife 2024-09, Vol.13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | eLife |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Wen, Chao Lu, Yuyi Solvi, Cwyn Dong, Shunping Wang, Cai Wen, Xiujun Xiao, Haijun Dong, Shikui Wen, Junbao Peng, Fei Chittka, Lars |
description | Bumblebees (
) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7554/eLife.97018 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_34f61329a21c4d0c85887074e0f75a69</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A809105627</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_34f61329a21c4d0c85887074e0f75a69</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A809105627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkluL1DAYhoso7rLulfdS8EaRjknTnK6WZT0NDAgewLuQpl-7GdtkTNJF_fVmDg47YnuR8PXJU_r2LYqnGC04pc1rWNkeFpIjLB4U5zWiqEKi-fbw3v6suIxxjfLFGyGwfFycEVnLmiF6Xvx-4yGW7Ty1I7QA5SZADwGcgdL3pfEuWTf7OZb-DkJpXYIQ5k2CrowpWDfEPDtsq808jnktk47ft_POGp2gnEC7WIHrsm7K_ltw0Xp39aR41OsxwuVhvSi-vnv75eZDtfr4fnlzvapMw2iqpOgo0m0necM1M4IB7-uGYAqUEWwkRsA5xR1IpsFwahhpCeaGS9MK0VNyUSz33s7rtdoEO-nwS3lt1W7gw6B0SNaMoEjTM0xqqWtsmg4ZQYXgOTZAPaeayey62rs2cztBZ8CloMcT6ekTZ2_V4O8Uxg1GZGd4cTAE_2OGmNRko4Fx1A5yzopgxDghNREZff4PuvZzcDmrTGUhQSgHcaQGnb_Aut7nF5utVF0LlOOhrOaZWvyHyncHk82_GXqb5ycHXp4c2FYBfqZBzzGq5edPp-yrPWuCjzE36BgIRmpbU7WrqdrVNNPP7md4ZP-WkvwBQszihg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111430024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Wen, Chao ; Lu, Yuyi ; Solvi, Cwyn ; Dong, Shunping ; Wang, Cai ; Wen, Xiujun ; Xiao, Haijun ; Dong, Shikui ; Wen, Junbao ; Peng, Fei ; Chittka, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Wen, Chao ; Lu, Yuyi ; Solvi, Cwyn ; Dong, Shunping ; Wang, Cai ; Wen, Xiujun ; Xiao, Haijun ; Dong, Shikui ; Wen, Junbao ; Peng, Fei ; Chittka, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Bumblebees (
) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-084X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-084X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39292605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: eLife Science Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Associative learning ; Bees ; Bees - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Bombus ; Bumblebees ; Comprehension - physiology ; Ecology ; Experiments ; feature generalisation ; Flowers - physiology ; image matching ; Preferences ; Reward ; Spatial discrimination learning ; Visual discrimination learning</subject><ispartof>eLife, 2024-09, Vol.13</ispartof><rights>2024, Wen, Lu et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 eLife Science Publications, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024, Wen, Lu et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024, Wen, Lu et al 2024 Wen, Lu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1637-5611 ; 0000-0002-0832-0493 ; 0000-0001-8153-1732 ; 0000-0002-5650-3454 ; 0000-0003-2517-6179</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3111430024/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3111430024?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39292605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solvi, Cwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shikui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Junbao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chittka, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</title><title>eLife</title><addtitle>Elife</addtitle><description>Bumblebees (
) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Associative learning</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bees - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>feature generalisation</subject><subject>Flowers - physiology</subject><subject>image matching</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination learning</subject><subject>Visual discrimination learning</subject><issn>2050-084X</issn><issn>2050-084X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkluL1DAYhoso7rLulfdS8EaRjknTnK6WZT0NDAgewLuQpl-7GdtkTNJF_fVmDg47YnuR8PXJU_r2LYqnGC04pc1rWNkeFpIjLB4U5zWiqEKi-fbw3v6suIxxjfLFGyGwfFycEVnLmiF6Xvx-4yGW7Ty1I7QA5SZADwGcgdL3pfEuWTf7OZb-DkJpXYIQ5k2CrowpWDfEPDtsq808jnktk47ft_POGp2gnEC7WIHrsm7K_ltw0Xp39aR41OsxwuVhvSi-vnv75eZDtfr4fnlzvapMw2iqpOgo0m0necM1M4IB7-uGYAqUEWwkRsA5xR1IpsFwahhpCeaGS9MK0VNyUSz33s7rtdoEO-nwS3lt1W7gw6B0SNaMoEjTM0xqqWtsmg4ZQYXgOTZAPaeayey62rs2cztBZ8CloMcT6ekTZ2_V4O8Uxg1GZGd4cTAE_2OGmNRko4Fx1A5yzopgxDghNREZff4PuvZzcDmrTGUhQSgHcaQGnb_Aut7nF5utVF0LlOOhrOaZWvyHyncHk82_GXqb5ycHXp4c2FYBfqZBzzGq5edPp-yrPWuCjzE36BgIRmpbU7WrqdrVNNPP7md4ZP-WkvwBQszihg</recordid><startdate>20240918</startdate><enddate>20240918</enddate><creator>Wen, Chao</creator><creator>Lu, Yuyi</creator><creator>Solvi, Cwyn</creator><creator>Dong, Shunping</creator><creator>Wang, Cai</creator><creator>Wen, Xiujun</creator><creator>Xiao, Haijun</creator><creator>Dong, Shikui</creator><creator>Wen, Junbao</creator><creator>Peng, Fei</creator><creator>Chittka, Lars</creator><general>eLife Science Publications, Ltd</general><general>eLife Sciences Publications Ltd</general><general>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-5611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-0493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-1732</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-3454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2517-6179</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240918</creationdate><title>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</title><author>Wen, Chao ; Lu, Yuyi ; Solvi, Cwyn ; Dong, Shunping ; Wang, Cai ; Wen, Xiujun ; Xiao, Haijun ; Dong, Shikui ; Wen, Junbao ; Peng, Fei ; Chittka, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Associative learning</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bees - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>feature generalisation</topic><topic>Flowers - physiology</topic><topic>image matching</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination learning</topic><topic>Visual discrimination learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solvi, Cwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shikui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Junbao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chittka, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>eLife</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wen, Chao</au><au>Lu, Yuyi</au><au>Solvi, Cwyn</au><au>Dong, Shunping</au><au>Wang, Cai</au><au>Wen, Xiujun</au><au>Xiao, Haijun</au><au>Dong, Shikui</au><au>Wen, Junbao</au><au>Peng, Fei</au><au>Chittka, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</atitle><jtitle>eLife</jtitle><addtitle>Elife</addtitle><date>2024-09-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issn>2050-084X</issn><eissn>2050-084X</eissn><abstract>Bumblebees (
) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>eLife Science Publications, Ltd</pub><pmid>39292605</pmid><doi>10.7554/eLife.97018</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-5611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-0493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-1732</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-3454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2517-6179</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2050-084X |
ispartof | eLife, 2024-09, Vol.13 |
issn | 2050-084X 2050-084X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_34f61329a21c4d0c85887074e0f75a69 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal cognition Animals Associative learning Bees Bees - physiology Behavior, Animal - physiology Bombus Bumblebees Comprehension - physiology Ecology Experiments feature generalisation Flowers - physiology image matching Preferences Reward Spatial discrimination learning Visual discrimination learning |
title | Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20bumblebee%20preference%20of%20continuous%20over%20interrupted%20strings%20in%20string-pulling%20tasks%20indicate%20means-end%20comprehension?&rft.jtitle=eLife&rft.au=Wen,%20Chao&rft.date=2024-09-18&rft.volume=13&rft.issn=2050-084X&rft.eissn=2050-084X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7554/eLife.97018&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA809105627%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111430024&rft_id=info:pmid/39292605&rft_galeid=A809105627&rfr_iscdi=true |