Loading…

Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?

Bumblebees ( ) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:eLife 2024-09, Vol.13
Main Authors: Wen, Chao, Lu, Yuyi, Solvi, Cwyn, Dong, Shunping, Wang, Cai, Wen, Xiujun, Xiao, Haijun, Dong, Shikui, Wen, Junbao, Peng, Fei, Chittka, Lars
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title eLife
container_volume 13
creator Wen, Chao
Lu, Yuyi
Solvi, Cwyn
Dong, Shunping
Wang, Cai
Wen, Xiujun
Xiao, Haijun
Dong, Shikui
Wen, Junbao
Peng, Fei
Chittka, Lars
description Bumblebees ( ) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.
doi_str_mv 10.7554/eLife.97018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_34f61329a21c4d0c85887074e0f75a69</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A809105627</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_34f61329a21c4d0c85887074e0f75a69</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A809105627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkluL1DAYhoso7rLulfdS8EaRjknTnK6WZT0NDAgewLuQpl-7GdtkTNJF_fVmDg47YnuR8PXJU_r2LYqnGC04pc1rWNkeFpIjLB4U5zWiqEKi-fbw3v6suIxxjfLFGyGwfFycEVnLmiF6Xvx-4yGW7Ty1I7QA5SZADwGcgdL3pfEuWTf7OZb-DkJpXYIQ5k2CrowpWDfEPDtsq808jnktk47ft_POGp2gnEC7WIHrsm7K_ltw0Xp39aR41OsxwuVhvSi-vnv75eZDtfr4fnlzvapMw2iqpOgo0m0necM1M4IB7-uGYAqUEWwkRsA5xR1IpsFwahhpCeaGS9MK0VNyUSz33s7rtdoEO-nwS3lt1W7gw6B0SNaMoEjTM0xqqWtsmg4ZQYXgOTZAPaeayey62rs2cztBZ8CloMcT6ekTZ2_V4O8Uxg1GZGd4cTAE_2OGmNRko4Fx1A5yzopgxDghNREZff4PuvZzcDmrTGUhQSgHcaQGnb_Aut7nF5utVF0LlOOhrOaZWvyHyncHk82_GXqb5ycHXp4c2FYBfqZBzzGq5edPp-yrPWuCjzE36BgIRmpbU7WrqdrVNNPP7md4ZP-WkvwBQszihg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111430024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Wen, Chao ; Lu, Yuyi ; Solvi, Cwyn ; Dong, Shunping ; Wang, Cai ; Wen, Xiujun ; Xiao, Haijun ; Dong, Shikui ; Wen, Junbao ; Peng, Fei ; Chittka, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Wen, Chao ; Lu, Yuyi ; Solvi, Cwyn ; Dong, Shunping ; Wang, Cai ; Wen, Xiujun ; Xiao, Haijun ; Dong, Shikui ; Wen, Junbao ; Peng, Fei ; Chittka, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Bumblebees ( ) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-084X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-084X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39292605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: eLife Science Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Associative learning ; Bees ; Bees - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Bombus ; Bumblebees ; Comprehension - physiology ; Ecology ; Experiments ; feature generalisation ; Flowers - physiology ; image matching ; Preferences ; Reward ; Spatial discrimination learning ; Visual discrimination learning</subject><ispartof>eLife, 2024-09, Vol.13</ispartof><rights>2024, Wen, Lu et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 eLife Science Publications, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024, Wen, Lu et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024, Wen, Lu et al 2024 Wen, Lu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1637-5611 ; 0000-0002-0832-0493 ; 0000-0001-8153-1732 ; 0000-0002-5650-3454 ; 0000-0003-2517-6179</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3111430024/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3111430024?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39292605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solvi, Cwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shikui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Junbao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chittka, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</title><title>eLife</title><addtitle>Elife</addtitle><description>Bumblebees ( ) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Associative learning</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bees - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>feature generalisation</subject><subject>Flowers - physiology</subject><subject>image matching</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination learning</subject><subject>Visual discrimination learning</subject><issn>2050-084X</issn><issn>2050-084X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkluL1DAYhoso7rLulfdS8EaRjknTnK6WZT0NDAgewLuQpl-7GdtkTNJF_fVmDg47YnuR8PXJU_r2LYqnGC04pc1rWNkeFpIjLB4U5zWiqEKi-fbw3v6suIxxjfLFGyGwfFycEVnLmiF6Xvx-4yGW7Ty1I7QA5SZADwGcgdL3pfEuWTf7OZb-DkJpXYIQ5k2CrowpWDfEPDtsq808jnktk47ft_POGp2gnEC7WIHrsm7K_ltw0Xp39aR41OsxwuVhvSi-vnv75eZDtfr4fnlzvapMw2iqpOgo0m0necM1M4IB7-uGYAqUEWwkRsA5xR1IpsFwahhpCeaGS9MK0VNyUSz33s7rtdoEO-nwS3lt1W7gw6B0SNaMoEjTM0xqqWtsmg4ZQYXgOTZAPaeayey62rs2cztBZ8CloMcT6ekTZ2_V4O8Uxg1GZGd4cTAE_2OGmNRko4Fx1A5yzopgxDghNREZff4PuvZzcDmrTGUhQSgHcaQGnb_Aut7nF5utVF0LlOOhrOaZWvyHyncHk82_GXqb5ycHXp4c2FYBfqZBzzGq5edPp-yrPWuCjzE36BgIRmpbU7WrqdrVNNPP7md4ZP-WkvwBQszihg</recordid><startdate>20240918</startdate><enddate>20240918</enddate><creator>Wen, Chao</creator><creator>Lu, Yuyi</creator><creator>Solvi, Cwyn</creator><creator>Dong, Shunping</creator><creator>Wang, Cai</creator><creator>Wen, Xiujun</creator><creator>Xiao, Haijun</creator><creator>Dong, Shikui</creator><creator>Wen, Junbao</creator><creator>Peng, Fei</creator><creator>Chittka, Lars</creator><general>eLife Science Publications, Ltd</general><general>eLife Sciences Publications Ltd</general><general>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-5611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-0493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-1732</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-3454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2517-6179</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240918</creationdate><title>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</title><author>Wen, Chao ; Lu, Yuyi ; Solvi, Cwyn ; Dong, Shunping ; Wang, Cai ; Wen, Xiujun ; Xiao, Haijun ; Dong, Shikui ; Wen, Junbao ; Peng, Fei ; Chittka, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Associative learning</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bees - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>feature generalisation</topic><topic>Flowers - physiology</topic><topic>image matching</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination learning</topic><topic>Visual discrimination learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solvi, Cwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shikui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Junbao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chittka, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>eLife</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wen, Chao</au><au>Lu, Yuyi</au><au>Solvi, Cwyn</au><au>Dong, Shunping</au><au>Wang, Cai</au><au>Wen, Xiujun</au><au>Xiao, Haijun</au><au>Dong, Shikui</au><au>Wen, Junbao</au><au>Peng, Fei</au><au>Chittka, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?</atitle><jtitle>eLife</jtitle><addtitle>Elife</addtitle><date>2024-09-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issn>2050-084X</issn><eissn>2050-084X</eissn><abstract>Bumblebees ( ) have been shown to engage in string-pulling behavior to access rewards. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether bumblebees display means-end comprehension in a string-pulling task. We presented bumblebees with two options: one where a string was connected to an artificial flower containing a reward and the other presenting an interrupted string. Bumblebees displayed a consistent preference for pulling connected strings over interrupted ones after training with a stepwise pulling technique. When exposed to novel string colors, bees continued to exhibit a bias towards pulling the connected string. This suggests that bumblebees engage in featural generalization of the visual display of the string connected to the flower in this task. If the view of the string connected to the flower was restricted during the training phase, the proportion of bumblebees choosing the connected strings significantly decreased. Similarly, when the bumblebees were confronted with coiled connected strings during the testing phase, they failed to identify and reject the interrupted strings. This finding underscores the significance of visual consistency in enabling the bumblebees to perform the task successfully. Our results suggest that bumblebees' ability to distinguish between continuous strings and interrupted strings relies on a combination of image matching and associative learning, rather than means-end understanding. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes employed by bumblebees when tackling complex spatial tasks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>eLife Science Publications, Ltd</pub><pmid>39292605</pmid><doi>10.7554/eLife.97018</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-5611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-0493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-1732</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-3454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2517-6179</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-084X
ispartof eLife, 2024-09, Vol.13
issn 2050-084X
2050-084X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_34f61329a21c4d0c85887074e0f75a69
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Animal behavior
Animal cognition
Animals
Associative learning
Bees
Bees - physiology
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Bombus
Bumblebees
Comprehension - physiology
Ecology
Experiments
feature generalisation
Flowers - physiology
image matching
Preferences
Reward
Spatial discrimination learning
Visual discrimination learning
title Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20bumblebee%20preference%20of%20continuous%20over%20interrupted%20strings%20in%20string-pulling%20tasks%20indicate%20means-end%20comprehension?&rft.jtitle=eLife&rft.au=Wen,%20Chao&rft.date=2024-09-18&rft.volume=13&rft.issn=2050-084X&rft.eissn=2050-084X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7554/eLife.97018&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA809105627%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98d50abd9747a6c86e7f24315e5631c910e7751de96aec75c63b317c79cb88f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111430024&rft_id=info:pmid/39292605&rft_galeid=A809105627&rfr_iscdi=true