To Be, or Not to Be … Pectoral Angina? The Pain Is the Same, but the Etiology Is Different-A Case Report

• Published in: Life (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1066
• Main Authors: Rosca, Ciprian Ilie, Lighezan, Daniel Florin, Cozma, Gabriel Veniamin, Branea, Horia Silviu, Nisulescu, Daniel Dumitru, Zus, Adrian Sebastian, Morariu, Stelian I, Kundnani, Nilima Rajpal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute coronary syndromes; Angina; Angina pectoris; angio-CT; Angiography; aspirin; Blood pressure; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Case Report; Causes and theories of causation; Chest; chest pain; Cholesterol; Clinics; Clopidogrel; Computed tomography; Coronary vessels; CT imaging; Development and progression; Diseases; Drug dosages; Electrocardiography; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical services; esophageal leiomyoma (EL); Esophagus; Etiology; Family medicine; Fibroids; Homocysteine; Hospitals; Hypertension; Implants; Internal medicine; Ischemia; Medicine; Outpatient care facilities; Pain; Patients; Performance evaluation; Statins; Surgical implants; Trachea
• ISSN: 2075-1729; 2075-1729
• DOI: 10.3390/life14091066

Chest pain is one of the most common causes of emergency room visits and also accounts for numerous visits to the family physician's office or Outpatient Clinics of cardiology or internal medicine. Here we present a case of a 48-year-old female patient who presented to our hospital emergency unit but refused hospital admission. She presented in our Outpatient Clinic with a complaint of typical chest pain indicating it to be of coronary origin. A computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography for the evaluation of this chest pain was indicated. While ruling out the coronary origin of this chest pain, we were surprised to have incidentally identified the presence of an esophageal tumor mass that had intimate contact with carina of the trachea. After the diagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma was made and its surgical treatment was performed, the patient was asymptomatic. Approximately one year after the surgical intervention was performed, following the cessation of antiplatelet therapy and statin, the patient returned to our Outpatient Clinic complaining of chest pain again with the same characteristics as previously presented, being terrified by the possibility of the recurrence of the esophageal leiomyoma. Upon resuming investigations, it was proven through coronary angio-CT evaluation that the etiology of the chest pain was indeed coronary this time. However, the patient still refused hospital admission and the performance of percutaneous coronary angiography with the potential implantation of a coronary stent. Chest pain can be due to various underlying pathologies and should not be neglected. A thorough investigation and timely management are key to treating this possible fatal symptom. In our case, the patient presented twice with the complaint of typical chest pain indicating a possible coronary event, but at the first presentation, it was due to esophageal leiomyoma, while a year later, the patient had similar pain, which was indeed this time due to coronary blockage. Hence, it is of utmost importance to think of all possible scenarios and to investigate accordingly, leaving no stone unturned.