Loading…

Transcriptional and metabolic profiling of sulfur starvation response in two monocots

Sulfur (S) is a mineral nutrient essential for plant growth and development, which is incorporated into diverse molecules fundamental for primary and secondary metabolism, plant defense, signaling, and maintaining cellular homeostasis. Although, S starvation response is well documented in the dicot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC plant biology 2024-04, Vol.24 (1), p.257-257, Article 257
Main Authors: Zenzen, Ivan, Cassol, Daniela, Westhoff, Philipp, Kopriva, Stanislav, Ristova, Daniela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sulfur (S) is a mineral nutrient essential for plant growth and development, which is incorporated into diverse molecules fundamental for primary and secondary metabolism, plant defense, signaling, and maintaining cellular homeostasis. Although, S starvation response is well documented in the dicot model Arabidopsis thaliana, it is not clear if the same transcriptional networks control the response also in the monocots. We performed series of physiological, expression, and metabolite analyses in two model monocot species, one representing the C plants, Oryza sativa cv. kitaake, and second representing the C plants, Setaria viridis. Our comprehensive transcriptomic analysis revealed twice as many differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in S. viridis than in O. sativa under S-deficiency, consistent with a greater loss of sulfur and S-containing metabolites under these conditions. Surprisingly, most of the DEGs and enriched gene ontology terms were species-specific, with an intersect of only 58 common DEGs. The transcriptional networks were different in roots and shoots of both species, in particular no genes were down-regulated by S-deficiency in the roots of both species. Our analysis shows that S-deficiency seems to have different physiological consequences in the two monocot species and their nutrient homeostasis might be under distinct control mechanisms.
ISSN:1471-2229
1471-2229
DOI:10.1186/s12870-024-04948-2